Use of a short educational video to improve the accuracy of colorectal polyp morphology assessment: A multicenter randomized controlled study

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70066
Takahiro Utsumi, Takahiro Horimatsu, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Akira Teramoto, Daizen Hirata, Mineo Iwatate, Shinwa Tanaka, Nobuaki Ikezawa, Masaya Esaki, Shozo Osera, Chikara Ebisutani, Hiroaki Saito, Nobukazu Agatsuma, Yukiko Hiramatasu, Yuki Nakanishi, Yasushi Sano, Hiroshi Seno
{"title":"Use of a short educational video to improve the accuracy of colorectal polyp morphology assessment: A multicenter randomized controlled study","authors":"Takahiro Utsumi,&nbsp;Takahiro Horimatsu,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Nishikawa,&nbsp;Akira Teramoto,&nbsp;Daizen Hirata,&nbsp;Mineo Iwatate,&nbsp;Shinwa Tanaka,&nbsp;Nobuaki Ikezawa,&nbsp;Masaya Esaki,&nbsp;Shozo Osera,&nbsp;Chikara Ebisutani,&nbsp;Hiroaki Saito,&nbsp;Nobukazu Agatsuma,&nbsp;Yukiko Hiramatasu,&nbsp;Yuki Nakanishi,&nbsp;Yasushi Sano,&nbsp;Hiroshi Seno","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Although accurate assessment of polyp morphology helps endoscopists select the appropriate management for colorectal polyps, some studies have reported unsatisfactory accuracy in such assessment. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of a short educational video available on the Internet for accurate polyp morphology assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to the pre- or post-education groups after a pre-test comprising images of 42 polyps, including 12 laterally spreading tumors. Participants who scored ≥ 80% on the pre-test were excluded. Only the post-education group completed the diagnostic test after watching an online educational video. The primary outcome was the difference in diagnostic accuracy between the pre-test and diagnostic tests for each group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 296 endoscopists enrolled from 48 institutions, 34 missed the test deadline, and 29 who scored ≥ 80% in the pre-test were excluded. The primary outcome analysis sets were 117 and 116 in the pre- and post-education groups, respectively. The mean pre-test accuracies in the pre-education and post-education groups were 60.6% and 60.7%, respectively. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between the pre-test and diagnostic test was significantly higher in the post-education than the pre-education group (12.0 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.9–14.1 and 2.3 points, 95% CI 0.9–3.6; <i>p </i>&lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter randomized controlled trial demonstrated the usefulness of a short educational video for accurate polyp morphology assessment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Although accurate assessment of polyp morphology helps endoscopists select the appropriate management for colorectal polyps, some studies have reported unsatisfactory accuracy in such assessment. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of a short educational video available on the Internet for accurate polyp morphology assessment.

Methods

This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to the pre- or post-education groups after a pre-test comprising images of 42 polyps, including 12 laterally spreading tumors. Participants who scored ≥ 80% on the pre-test were excluded. Only the post-education group completed the diagnostic test after watching an online educational video. The primary outcome was the difference in diagnostic accuracy between the pre-test and diagnostic tests for each group.

Results

Of the 296 endoscopists enrolled from 48 institutions, 34 missed the test deadline, and 29 who scored ≥ 80% in the pre-test were excluded. The primary outcome analysis sets were 117 and 116 in the pre- and post-education groups, respectively. The mean pre-test accuracies in the pre-education and post-education groups were 60.6% and 60.7%, respectively. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between the pre-test and diagnostic test was significantly higher in the post-education than the pre-education group (12.0 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.9–14.1 and 2.3 points, 95% CI 0.9–3.6; < 0.001).

Conclusion

This multicenter randomized controlled trial demonstrated the usefulness of a short educational video for accurate polyp morphology assessment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for distal malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer: An observational study Endoscopic risk factors to inform early detection of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication: Meta-analysis and systematic review Proton pump inhibitor-induced large gastric polyps can regress within 2 months after discontinuation: Experience from two cases Multiple esophageal ulcers in a pediatric case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A case report Endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1