Addressing code response challenges: Development of a pharmacist-focused training program at an Academic Medical Center

IF 1.5 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1002/jac5.2062
Lindsay Jacobs Pharm.D., MPH, Jennifer Tawwater Pharm.D., Lisa Skariah Pharm.D., Bhavyata Parag Pharm.D., Klayton Ryman Pharm.D., Chephra McKee Pharm.D., Kathryn Cox Pharm.D., Whitney Chaney Pharm.D., Josephine Tenii Pharm.D., Meagan Johns Pharm.D., MBA
{"title":"Addressing code response challenges: Development of a pharmacist-focused training program at an Academic Medical Center","authors":"Lindsay Jacobs Pharm.D., MPH,&nbsp;Jennifer Tawwater Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Lisa Skariah Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Bhavyata Parag Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Klayton Ryman Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Chephra McKee Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kathryn Cox Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Whitney Chaney Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Josephine Tenii Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Meagan Johns Pharm.D., MBA","doi":"10.1002/jac5.2062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacists are essential to the multidisciplinary team during code response. Commercially available basic and advanced-life support training programs are not tailored for the depth of medication-specific content essential for pharmacists to competently respond to codes. Opportunities exist to provide additional training to improve pharmacists' code response.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To develop pharmacist-specific didactic education and hands-on assessments for adult code response.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>At our institution, acute care clinical staff pharmacists attend all adult codes. A mandatory pharmacist training program was designed to meet minimum institutional expectations for code response and address knowledge gaps. The program included three components: (1) online training module, (2) knowledge-based assessment, and (3) hands-on assessment. Pharmacists were surveyed pre- and post-completion of the training program. The surveys consisted of 15 Likert scale questions and open-ended questions. Chi-square tests were used to compare a “positive” response to pre- and post-survey questions. A “positive” response was defined as “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” on the Likert questions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-three pharmacists completed the training program with 71 passing the hands-on skills training on the first attempt. The pre- and post-intervention survey was completed by 43/74 (58.1%) and 33/82 (40.2%) of pharmacists, respectively. A statistically significant increase in the number of “positive” survey responses was noted in 7 of the 15 Likert scale questions post-intervention, with nominal improvements in the remaining 8. There were notable improvements in pharmacist perceived familiarity and comfort with medication locations (9% vs. 64%) and preparation (44% vs. 76%), and greater confidence in using available resources.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The pharmacist-specific code response training resulted in notable improvements in disclosed familiarity and comfort with code responsibilities. This training was transitioned into an annual competency module that may be used as a framework for other institutions implementing a similar process to maintain a standard level of competence in code response for pharmacists.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"8 1","pages":"34-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.2062","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://accpjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pharmacists are essential to the multidisciplinary team during code response. Commercially available basic and advanced-life support training programs are not tailored for the depth of medication-specific content essential for pharmacists to competently respond to codes. Opportunities exist to provide additional training to improve pharmacists' code response.

Objective

To develop pharmacist-specific didactic education and hands-on assessments for adult code response.

Methods

At our institution, acute care clinical staff pharmacists attend all adult codes. A mandatory pharmacist training program was designed to meet minimum institutional expectations for code response and address knowledge gaps. The program included three components: (1) online training module, (2) knowledge-based assessment, and (3) hands-on assessment. Pharmacists were surveyed pre- and post-completion of the training program. The surveys consisted of 15 Likert scale questions and open-ended questions. Chi-square tests were used to compare a “positive” response to pre- and post-survey questions. A “positive” response was defined as “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” on the Likert questions.

Results

Seventy-three pharmacists completed the training program with 71 passing the hands-on skills training on the first attempt. The pre- and post-intervention survey was completed by 43/74 (58.1%) and 33/82 (40.2%) of pharmacists, respectively. A statistically significant increase in the number of “positive” survey responses was noted in 7 of the 15 Likert scale questions post-intervention, with nominal improvements in the remaining 8. There were notable improvements in pharmacist perceived familiarity and comfort with medication locations (9% vs. 64%) and preparation (44% vs. 76%), and greater confidence in using available resources.

Conclusion

The pharmacist-specific code response training resulted in notable improvements in disclosed familiarity and comfort with code responsibilities. This training was transitioned into an annual competency module that may be used as a framework for other institutions implementing a similar process to maintain a standard level of competence in code response for pharmacists.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对代码响应挑战:学术医疗中心以药剂师为重点的培训计划的发展
在代码响应过程中,药剂师对多学科团队至关重要。商业上可获得的基本和高级生命支持培训计划并不是针对药剂师对规范作出有效反应所必需的药物特定内容的深度量身定制的。有机会提供额外的培训,以改善药剂师的规范反应。目的开展针对药师的教学教育和成人密码反应实践评估。方法在我院,急症护理临床工作人员、药师参加所有成人编码。强制性药剂师培训计划旨在满足机构对代码响应的最低期望,并解决知识差距。该计划包括三个部分:(1)在线培训模块,(2)基于知识的评估,(3)实践评估。药剂师在培训计划完成前和完成后接受了调查。调查包括15个李克特量表问题和开放式问题。卡方检验用于比较对调查前和调查后问题的“积极”回答。“肯定”的回答被定义为“非常同意”或“同意”李克特问题。结果73名药师完成培训,其中71名药师一次通过实践技能培训。完成干预前和干预后调查的药师分别为43/74(58.1%)和33/82(40.2%)。干预后,在15个李克特量表问题中,有7个问题的“积极”调查回答的数量在统计上显著增加,其余8个问题略有改善。药师对药物位置的熟悉度和舒适度(9%对64%)和制剂(44%对76%)有显著改善,对利用现有资源有更大的信心。结论针对药师的编码反应培训显著提高了药师对编码责任的熟悉度和舒适度。该培训已转变为年度能力模块,可作为其他机构实施类似流程的框架,以保持药剂师在代码响应方面的标准能力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of an In-House Resident Clinical Pharmacist On-Call Program on Resident Physician Training: A Cross-Sectional Survey The Current Landscape of Anticoagulation Stewardship Implementation in the United States and Around the World: An International Survey Impact of Pharmacist-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship on Antibiotic Use in Intensive Care: A Prospective Audit and Feedback Approach Clinical Pharmacists and Industry: Guidelines for Professional Interactions Optimizing Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hospital-at-Home Programs: On Behalf of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1