Impact of pre-stenting and bladder dranaige on intrapelvic pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1002/bco2.490
Sezgin Yeni, Hakan Kilicarslan, Gokhan Ocakoglu, Burhan Coskun, Mehmet Cagatay Cicek, Kadir Omur Gunseren, Ismet Yavascaoglu, Onur Kaygisiz
{"title":"Impact of pre-stenting and bladder dranaige on intrapelvic pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery","authors":"Sezgin Yeni,&nbsp;Hakan Kilicarslan,&nbsp;Gokhan Ocakoglu,&nbsp;Burhan Coskun,&nbsp;Mehmet Cagatay Cicek,&nbsp;Kadir Omur Gunseren,&nbsp;Ismet Yavascaoglu,&nbsp;Onur Kaygisiz","doi":"10.1002/bco2.490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to assess the effect of pre-stenting and bladder drainage on intrapelvic pressure (IP) during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-five consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and meticulously recorded in a data form. Forty-two patients meeting the inclusion criteria after applying exclusion factors. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (21 patients with preoperative JJ stents) and Group 2 (21 patients without preoperative JJ stents). IP was measured during RIRS, and the impact of various factors, including pre-stenting, bladder drainage and hydronephrosis (HN) grade, on IP was analysed through univariate and multiple linear regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The perioperative mean highest IP (78 ± 18.2 mmHg vs. 110 ± 23.9 mmHg), median lowest IP (29 mmHg vs. 42 mmHg) and median overall IP (41 mmHg vs. 69 mmHg) were significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (all p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-stenting and mild HN (Grade 0–1) were independent predictors of reduced IP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Pre-stenting led to a significant reduction in IP during RIRS, likely due to passive ureteral dilation. Additionally, bladder drainage with urethral catheter further decreased IP. These findings suggest that pre-stenting and bladder drainage should be considered as strategies to reduce IP during RIRS, potentially improving surgical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.490","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to assess the effect of pre-stenting and bladder drainage on intrapelvic pressure (IP) during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS).

Methods

Eighty-five consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and meticulously recorded in a data form. Forty-two patients meeting the inclusion criteria after applying exclusion factors. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (21 patients with preoperative JJ stents) and Group 2 (21 patients without preoperative JJ stents). IP was measured during RIRS, and the impact of various factors, including pre-stenting, bladder drainage and hydronephrosis (HN) grade, on IP was analysed through univariate and multiple linear regression.

Results

The perioperative mean highest IP (78 ± 18.2 mmHg vs. 110 ± 23.9 mmHg), median lowest IP (29 mmHg vs. 42 mmHg) and median overall IP (41 mmHg vs. 69 mmHg) were significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-stenting and mild HN (Grade 0–1) were independent predictors of reduced IP.

Conclusion

Pre-stenting led to a significant reduction in IP during RIRS, likely due to passive ureteral dilation. Additionally, bladder drainage with urethral catheter further decreased IP. These findings suggest that pre-stenting and bladder drainage should be considered as strategies to reduce IP during RIRS, potentially improving surgical outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逆行肾内手术中预置支架和膀胱引流对盆腔内压力的影响
目的探讨逆行肾内手术(RIRS)中预支架植入和膀胱引流对盆腔内压(IP)的影响。方法前瞻性连续纳入85例患者,详细记录资料。应用排除因子后,42例患者符合纳入标准。将患者分为两组:1组(术前植入JJ支架21例)和2组(术前未植入JJ支架21例)。在RIRS期间测量IP,并通过单变量和多元线性回归分析各种因素(包括支架植入前、膀胱引流和肾积水(HN)等级)对IP的影响。结果1组围手术期平均最高IP(78±18.2 mmHg vs 110±23.9 mmHg)、中位最低IP (29 mmHg vs 42 mmHg)和中位总IP (41 mmHg vs 69 mmHg)均显著低于2组(p < 0.001)。多因素分析显示支架植入前和轻度HN(0-1级)是IP降低的独立预测因素。结论预支架置入可显著降低RIRS期间的IP,可能是由于被动输尿管扩张所致。此外,膀胱导尿管引流进一步降低了IP。这些发现表明,预支架植入和膀胱引流应被视为减少RIRS期间IP的策略,可能会改善手术结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Robotic retroperitoneal surgery in a uro-oncology specialised centre: Translating RPLND expertise from testicular cancer to non-genitourinary retroperitoneal tumour resection Robotic retroperitoneal surgery in a uro-oncology specialised centre: Translating RPLND expertise from testicular cancer to non-genitourinary retroperitoneal tumour resection Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection and long-term outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer before radiotherapy Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Single-Centre Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1