Developing a Multicomponent Intervention for Family Caregivers of Older Adults in Singapore: A Delphi Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health & Social Care in the Community Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1155/hsc/8495394
Jonathan Gao, Yu Wei Neo, Stacey Soo, Poh Hoon June Teng, Ze Ling Nai, Ee Yuee Chan
{"title":"Developing a Multicomponent Intervention for Family Caregivers of Older Adults in Singapore: A Delphi Study","authors":"Jonathan Gao,&nbsp;Yu Wei Neo,&nbsp;Stacey Soo,&nbsp;Poh Hoon June Teng,&nbsp;Ze Ling Nai,&nbsp;Ee Yuee Chan","doi":"10.1155/hsc/8495394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Singapore is experiencing both an ageing population and a decreasing birth rate, with fewer adults to care for older adults. Caregiving for older adults can be taxing, and hence, caregivers need support. Using previous literature and the study team’s interactions with caregivers, a multicomponent intervention, consisting of a mobile application, fall detection and response service, and peer support program, was conceptualized. To better understand the needs and challenges of caregivers and to determine the potential usefulness of the multicomponent intervention, the study team engaged ward nurses and Community Health Team (CHT) members, two groups of stakeholders that regularly interact with caregivers in their work, using a modified Delphi technique. Ward nurses and CHT members each formed one Delphi panel and answered statements specific to their panel over two rounds. Nineteen ward nurses and 15 CHT members participated. The final participation rate for both rounds was 100% (19/19) for ward nurses and 93% (14/15) for CHT members. A total of 17/30 statements (57%) and 10/32 statements (31%) reached consensus for ward nurses and CHT members, respectively. Ward nurses agreed that (a) caregivers will benefit from a one-stop digital resource library (84%), (b) the importance of having a wide array of localized information for this digital resource (79%–89%) and (c) several challenges associated with caregiver training (74%–79%). The CHT members agreed that (a) caregivers do not receive adequate support outside their immediate family (86%), (b) caregivers struggle to manage care recipients’ behaviours and emotions (80%), and (c) there is a lack of relevant community resources for caregivers (71%–93%). The agreements indicated the feasibility of certain components of the intervention. Refinements to the multicomponent intervention were also made based on the findings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/8495394","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/8495394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Singapore is experiencing both an ageing population and a decreasing birth rate, with fewer adults to care for older adults. Caregiving for older adults can be taxing, and hence, caregivers need support. Using previous literature and the study team’s interactions with caregivers, a multicomponent intervention, consisting of a mobile application, fall detection and response service, and peer support program, was conceptualized. To better understand the needs and challenges of caregivers and to determine the potential usefulness of the multicomponent intervention, the study team engaged ward nurses and Community Health Team (CHT) members, two groups of stakeholders that regularly interact with caregivers in their work, using a modified Delphi technique. Ward nurses and CHT members each formed one Delphi panel and answered statements specific to their panel over two rounds. Nineteen ward nurses and 15 CHT members participated. The final participation rate for both rounds was 100% (19/19) for ward nurses and 93% (14/15) for CHT members. A total of 17/30 statements (57%) and 10/32 statements (31%) reached consensus for ward nurses and CHT members, respectively. Ward nurses agreed that (a) caregivers will benefit from a one-stop digital resource library (84%), (b) the importance of having a wide array of localized information for this digital resource (79%–89%) and (c) several challenges associated with caregiver training (74%–79%). The CHT members agreed that (a) caregivers do not receive adequate support outside their immediate family (86%), (b) caregivers struggle to manage care recipients’ behaviours and emotions (80%), and (c) there is a lack of relevant community resources for caregivers (71%–93%). The agreements indicated the feasibility of certain components of the intervention. Refinements to the multicomponent intervention were also made based on the findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展多成分干预的家庭照顾者在新加坡:德尔菲研究
新加坡正在经历人口老龄化和出生率下降,照顾老年人的成年人越来越少。照顾老年人可能很费力,因此,照顾者需要支持。利用先前的文献和研究小组与护理人员的互动,我们构想了一种多组件干预,包括移动应用程序、跌倒检测和响应服务以及同伴支持计划。为了更好地了解护理人员的需求和挑战,并确定多成分干预的潜在有用性,研究小组采用改进的德尔菲技术,与病房护士和社区卫生团队(CHT)成员进行了接触,这两组利益相关者在工作中定期与护理人员互动。病房护士和CHT成员各组成一个德尔菲小组,并在两轮内回答他们小组的具体问题。19名病区护士及15名医护人员参与。两轮的最终参与率,病房护士为100% (19/19),CHT会员为93%(14/15)。分别有17/30份(57%)和10/32份(31%)在病房护士和CHT会员中达成共识。病房护士同意(a)护理人员将受益于一站式数字资源库(84%),(b)为该数字资源提供广泛的本地化信息的重要性(79%-89%)和(c)与护理人员培训相关的几个挑战(74%-79%)。小组成员同意(a)照顾者没有得到直系亲属以外的足够支持(86%),(b)照顾者难以管理照顾者的行为和情绪(80%),以及(c)照顾者缺乏相关的社区资源(71%-93%)。这些协议表明干预的某些组成部分是可行的。根据研究结果,还对多组分干预进行了改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
期刊最新文献
Association Between Social Isolation and Fall Injury Suicidal Ideation as a Multifactorial Concept: A Systematic Review of Psychosocial Risk Factors in Women The Effect of Home- and Community-Based Eldercare Services on Depression in the Elderly: Evidence From China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey An Exploration of the Experiences of Vulnerable Young People Participating in a Stand-Up Paddle-Boarding Therapy Course: A Phenomenological Study Digital Technologies for Community Health Worker–Facilitated Hearing Assessment in Low Resource Settings: A Feasibility Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1