Material hardship and use of social safety net programs among LGBT adults and their families

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1111/asap.12432
Emmett R. Henderson, Maiya Hotchkiss, Clarisse A. Lin, John R. Blosnich
{"title":"Material hardship and use of social safety net programs among LGBT adults and their families","authors":"Emmett R. Henderson,&nbsp;Maiya Hotchkiss,&nbsp;Clarisse A. Lin,&nbsp;John R. Blosnich","doi":"10.1111/asap.12432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people experience higher levels of economic insecurity and poverty compared to non-LGBT people. Social safety net programs may reduce this disparity, but the uptake of these programs among LGBT adults has rarely been assessed. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the 2018–2020 Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey to compare differences in material hardship and social safety net program utilization between LGBT and non-LGBT adults in the United States. LGBT participants were more likely to report lack of an emergency fund, food insecurity, utilities hardship, medical hardship, and multiple material hardships. LGBT adults had higher odds compared to non-LGBT adults of using SNAP, income- or disability-based insurance, SSI or SSDI, and housing assistance. There were no differences in use of WIC, reduced-price/free school lunch benefits, or charitable food. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the social safety net programs for reducing material hardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12432","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people experience higher levels of economic insecurity and poverty compared to non-LGBT people. Social safety net programs may reduce this disparity, but the uptake of these programs among LGBT adults has rarely been assessed. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the 2018–2020 Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey to compare differences in material hardship and social safety net program utilization between LGBT and non-LGBT adults in the United States. LGBT participants were more likely to report lack of an emergency fund, food insecurity, utilities hardship, medical hardship, and multiple material hardships. LGBT adults had higher odds compared to non-LGBT adults of using SNAP, income- or disability-based insurance, SSI or SSDI, and housing assistance. There were no differences in use of WIC, reduced-price/free school lunch benefits, or charitable food. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the social safety net programs for reducing material hardship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LGBT成年人及其家庭的物质困难和社会保障项目的使用情况
与非LGBT人群相比,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人(LGBT)的经济不安全感和贫困程度更高。社会安全网计划可能会减少这种差距,但LGBT成年人对这些计划的接受程度很少得到评估。我们对2018-2020年福祉和基本需求调查进行了二次数据分析,以比较美国LGBT和非LGBT成年人在物质困难和社会安全网计划利用方面的差异。LGBT参与者更有可能报告缺乏应急基金、食品不安全、公用事业困难、医疗困难和多种物质困难。与非LGBT成年人相比,LGBT成年人使用SNAP、基于收入或残疾的保险、SSI或SSDI以及住房援助的几率更高。在WIC、减价/免费学校午餐福利或慈善食品的使用方面没有差异。未来的研究需要评估社会安全网计划在减少物质困难方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the “new” disruptive behavior at live music events: Group normative (mis)alignment and collective self-regulation The push of political violence: How exposure to violent political action impacts perceived violence, and political support Juventud in revolt? Linked fate, political attitudes, and presidential candidate preferences of young Latinos in the 2024 election How Urban Population Change Elicits Prejudice Toward Migrant Workers in China: The Mediating Roles of Status and Entitativity Threats A place for all? Feminine gender expression and communal opportunities in STEM bolster STEM belonging and motivation for sexual and gender minorities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1