Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall Characteristics Derived From Multiple Gridded Precipitation Datasets: A Comparative Assessment

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES International Journal of Climatology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1002/joc.8708
Sandipan Paul, Priyank J. Sharma, Ramesh S. V. Teegavarapu
{"title":"Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall Characteristics Derived From Multiple Gridded Precipitation Datasets: A Comparative Assessment","authors":"Sandipan Paul,&nbsp;Priyank J. Sharma,&nbsp;Ramesh S. V. Teegavarapu","doi":"10.1002/joc.8708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Precipitation, a crucial component of the Earth system processes, regulates the spatiotemporal cyclicity of water, energy, and carbon fluxes. Accurate precipitation datasets leverage the understanding of precipitation dynamics and are vital for hydro-climatological studies. South Asian monsoon is a complex, multi-scale interacting, synoptic, and ocean–land–atmosphere coupled system, contributing to significant spatial and temporal variability in summer monsoonal rainfall across India. This study evaluates four types of gridded (observational, satellite, reanalysis, and hybrid) precipitation products in their ability to replicate Indian Summer Monsoonal Rainfall (ISMR) characteristics using the India Meteorological Department (IMD) 0.25° gridded data as the baseline. A comparative assessment is performed in this study that uses several continuous and interval-based performance measures to evaluate the overall rainfall magnitude detectability and time-matched capturing of rainfall events. A new metric, rank score, is developed by aggregating multiple measures to find the best product. The analyses based on several performance measures indicate that MSWEP is the best dataset (rank one) that closely approximates the occurrence and magnitude of IMD-based rainfall events, while APHRODITE, CHIRPS, and IMDAA are ranked as the next best set of products. PGF is ranked the lowest among all products evaluated and is not recommended for applications. Nonetheless, APHRODITE suffers from strong negative biases, while the reanalysis (IMDAA, ERA5-Land, PGF) datasets show significant positive biases. Among the products evaluated, APHRODITE, ERA5-Land, and IMDAA have shown a limited ability to detect excess, normal, and deficit monsoon years, respectively. In general, the performance of satellite-based data products is superior to that of reanalysis datasets in accurately characterising the monsoon years. ERA5-Land is noted to be the best-performing dataset among the reanalysis products. The comprehensive comparative assessment carried out in this study benefits the selection and use of appropriate gridded precipitation products for hydroclimatic modelling, climate variability, and change studies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precipitation, a crucial component of the Earth system processes, regulates the spatiotemporal cyclicity of water, energy, and carbon fluxes. Accurate precipitation datasets leverage the understanding of precipitation dynamics and are vital for hydro-climatological studies. South Asian monsoon is a complex, multi-scale interacting, synoptic, and ocean–land–atmosphere coupled system, contributing to significant spatial and temporal variability in summer monsoonal rainfall across India. This study evaluates four types of gridded (observational, satellite, reanalysis, and hybrid) precipitation products in their ability to replicate Indian Summer Monsoonal Rainfall (ISMR) characteristics using the India Meteorological Department (IMD) 0.25° gridded data as the baseline. A comparative assessment is performed in this study that uses several continuous and interval-based performance measures to evaluate the overall rainfall magnitude detectability and time-matched capturing of rainfall events. A new metric, rank score, is developed by aggregating multiple measures to find the best product. The analyses based on several performance measures indicate that MSWEP is the best dataset (rank one) that closely approximates the occurrence and magnitude of IMD-based rainfall events, while APHRODITE, CHIRPS, and IMDAA are ranked as the next best set of products. PGF is ranked the lowest among all products evaluated and is not recommended for applications. Nonetheless, APHRODITE suffers from strong negative biases, while the reanalysis (IMDAA, ERA5-Land, PGF) datasets show significant positive biases. Among the products evaluated, APHRODITE, ERA5-Land, and IMDAA have shown a limited ability to detect excess, normal, and deficit monsoon years, respectively. In general, the performance of satellite-based data products is superior to that of reanalysis datasets in accurately characterising the monsoon years. ERA5-Land is noted to be the best-performing dataset among the reanalysis products. The comprehensive comparative assessment carried out in this study benefits the selection and use of appropriate gridded precipitation products for hydroclimatic modelling, climate variability, and change studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多格点降水资料的印度夏季风降水特征的比较评估
降水是地球系统过程的重要组成部分,调节着水、能量和碳通量的时空循环。准确的降水数据集利用了对降水动力学的理解,对水文气候学研究至关重要。南亚季风是一个复杂的、多尺度的、相互作用的、天气的、海洋-陆地-大气耦合系统,对印度夏季季风降雨的时空变化有重要影响。本研究使用印度气象局(IMD) 0.25°格点数据作为基线,评估了四种类型的格点降水产品(观测、卫星、再分析和混合)复制印度夏季季风降雨(ISMR)特征的能力。在本研究中进行了一项比较评估,该评估使用了几个连续的和基于间隔的性能度量来评估总体降雨量的可探测性和降雨事件的时间匹配捕获。一个新的指标,排名得分,是通过聚合多个指标来找到最好的产品。基于几个性能指标的分析表明,MSWEP是最好的数据集(排名第一),它非常接近基于imd的降雨事件的发生和大小,而APHRODITE、CHIRPS和IMDAA是排名第二的产品集。PGF在所有评估产品中排名最低,不推荐应用。尽管如此,APHRODITE遭受强烈的负偏倚,而再分析(IMDAA, ERA5-Land, PGF)数据集显示显著的正偏倚。在评估的产品中,APHRODITE、ERA5-Land和IMDAA分别显示出检测季风年过剩、正常和不足的有限能力。总体而言,卫星数据产品在准确描述季风年特征方面优于再分析数据集。ERA5-Land被认为是再分析产品中表现最好的数据集。本研究中进行的综合比较评估有利于为水文气候建模、气候变率和变化研究选择和使用适当的网格降水产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Mapping Diurnal Heat Stress in Nigeria: Spatial and Temporal Changes Over Seven Decades Post-Processed CMIP6 Climate Projections for Hydro-Environmental Risk Assessment in the Middle East and Central Asia Entropy-Based Analysis of Evaporation Variability: Assessing Climatic Parameters Using Wavelet Coherence and GeoDetector Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Runoff Variability and Extremes in China Using High-Resolution Simulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1