Development of Sci-Tech Journals in China Stimulated by the China Sci-Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1002/leap.1654
Chuwei Li, Yaping Li, Zuoqi Ding
{"title":"Development of Sci-Tech Journals in China Stimulated by the China Sci-Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan","authors":"Chuwei Li,&nbsp;Yaping Li,&nbsp;Zuoqi Ding","doi":"10.1002/leap.1654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to evaluate the influence of the China Sci-Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan (CJEAP) on the development of Chinese science and technology (sci-tech) journals. The performance of bibliometric indicators of these journals before and after the implementation of this plan is examined. In particular, a discipline richness algorithm is employed to evaluate whether and how the funding plan affected the disciplinal coverage of publications. The results show that the influence of CJEAP funding in sci-tech journals published in China is not evenly distributed. Highly funded journals appear to have expanded both the range of research areas and disciplines, and the article volume, while poorly funded journals mainly focus on attracting manuscripts with higher scientific impact but display less expanded disciplinal range. New journals funded by CJEAP are characterised with high scientific levels focusing on highly sophisticated fields, but initially featuring a relatively small article volume. Notably, a positive relationship exists between the international collaboration rate and citation ranking score, and thus the expansion of article volume with manuscripts mainly from Chinese scholars may not be conducive for enhancing the international influence of journals published in China. In summary, our results indicate that CJEAP funding has elicited powerful influence in promoting sci-tech journals published in China, suggesting continuous funding support should be both necessary and efficient for further promoting the development of sci-tech journals published in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1654","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the influence of the China Sci-Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan (CJEAP) on the development of Chinese science and technology (sci-tech) journals. The performance of bibliometric indicators of these journals before and after the implementation of this plan is examined. In particular, a discipline richness algorithm is employed to evaluate whether and how the funding plan affected the disciplinal coverage of publications. The results show that the influence of CJEAP funding in sci-tech journals published in China is not evenly distributed. Highly funded journals appear to have expanded both the range of research areas and disciplines, and the article volume, while poorly funded journals mainly focus on attracting manuscripts with higher scientific impact but display less expanded disciplinal range. New journals funded by CJEAP are characterised with high scientific levels focusing on highly sophisticated fields, but initially featuring a relatively small article volume. Notably, a positive relationship exists between the international collaboration rate and citation ranking score, and thus the expansion of article volume with manuscripts mainly from Chinese scholars may not be conducive for enhancing the international influence of journals published in China. In summary, our results indicate that CJEAP funding has elicited powerful influence in promoting sci-tech journals published in China, suggesting continuous funding support should be both necessary and efficient for further promoting the development of sci-tech journals published in China.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国科技期刊创优行动计划对中国科技期刊发展的推动
本研究旨在评价中国科技期刊卓越行动计划(CJEAP)对中国科技期刊发展的影响。考察了该计划实施前后这些期刊的文献计量指标的表现。特别是,采用学科丰富度算法来评估资助计划是否以及如何影响出版物的学科覆盖。结果表明,中国科技期刊在中国科技期刊中受到的资助影响并不均匀。高资助期刊似乎扩大了研究领域和学科范围以及文章数量,而低资助期刊主要关注吸引具有更高科学影响力的稿件,但扩展的学科范围较少。由CJEAP资助的新期刊具有高科学水平的特点,专注于高度复杂的领域,但最初的特点是文章量相对较小。值得注意的是,国际合作率与引文排名得分之间存在正相关关系,因此,以中国学者为主的论文量的扩大可能不利于提高在中国发表的期刊的国际影响力。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,中国科技期刊资助在促进中国科技期刊出版方面产生了强大的影响力,这表明持续的资助支持对于进一步促进中国科技期刊的发展是必要的和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews Scoping Reviews Should Describe—Not Score From Findings to Meaning: A Strategic Framework for the Discussion Section Scholarly Communications in 2025: An Aerial Evaluation of a System Challenged by AI and Much More Enhancing, Understanding and Adoption of the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1