The Social Prescribing Link Worker—Clarifying the Role to Harness Potential: A Scoping Review

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health & Social Care in the Community Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1155/hsc/4394123
Jill Mulholland, Karen Galway, Liam O’Hare, Marcello Bertotti, Aideen Gildea
{"title":"The Social Prescribing Link Worker—Clarifying the Role to Harness Potential: A Scoping Review","authors":"Jill Mulholland,&nbsp;Karen Galway,&nbsp;Liam O’Hare,&nbsp;Marcello Bertotti,&nbsp;Aideen Gildea","doi":"10.1155/hsc/4394123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Recent work outlines definitions of social prescribing, but the role of a social prescribing link worker (SPLW) remains ill defined. Core components of the role must be clarified to enable the study of its impact in connecting people to community-based support and subsequent outcomes. This review compiles and summarises published information on the SPLW role. A scoping review was completed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Review. Suitable online databases were searched using identified terms, a review of the reference lists of identified papers was completed and relevant grey literature was identified through Google Scholar. Relevant reports from UK-based social prescribing networks and government organisations were gathered. Eligibility of each paper was determined based on the specified criteria. Inclusion criteria were identified using the PCC (Population; Concept; Context) framework. Of the 251 search results originally identified, 15 peer-reviewed papers met the criteria for inclusion. Five additional published reports from government and community organisations and networks were identified. Data were extracted and collated in tabular form. Thematic data analysis highlighted four common themes clarifying the role of the SPLW and identifying improvements required to advance social prescribing referral processes. (1) SPLW works in collaboration with the participant, to identify personal needs and goals, and monitors progress over time. (2) SPLW connects service users to community/statutory support. (3) SPLW views health in a holistic manner. (4) The importance of training for SPLWs, and those referring into the system, to improve the referral process. Disparity in language and roles is evident, making it difficult to describe and compare the role across social prescribing services. The importance of training is outlined, and training recommendations are made. Additional effort is needed to clarify the role, impact and training requirements within social prescribing, to strengthen the evidence base, and allow applicability and transferability across services.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/4394123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/4394123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent work outlines definitions of social prescribing, but the role of a social prescribing link worker (SPLW) remains ill defined. Core components of the role must be clarified to enable the study of its impact in connecting people to community-based support and subsequent outcomes. This review compiles and summarises published information on the SPLW role. A scoping review was completed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Review. Suitable online databases were searched using identified terms, a review of the reference lists of identified papers was completed and relevant grey literature was identified through Google Scholar. Relevant reports from UK-based social prescribing networks and government organisations were gathered. Eligibility of each paper was determined based on the specified criteria. Inclusion criteria were identified using the PCC (Population; Concept; Context) framework. Of the 251 search results originally identified, 15 peer-reviewed papers met the criteria for inclusion. Five additional published reports from government and community organisations and networks were identified. Data were extracted and collated in tabular form. Thematic data analysis highlighted four common themes clarifying the role of the SPLW and identifying improvements required to advance social prescribing referral processes. (1) SPLW works in collaboration with the participant, to identify personal needs and goals, and monitors progress over time. (2) SPLW connects service users to community/statutory support. (3) SPLW views health in a holistic manner. (4) The importance of training for SPLWs, and those referring into the system, to improve the referral process. Disparity in language and roles is evident, making it difficult to describe and compare the role across social prescribing services. The importance of training is outlined, and training recommendations are made. Additional effort is needed to clarify the role, impact and training requirements within social prescribing, to strengthen the evidence base, and allow applicability and transferability across services.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会处方链接工作者-澄清利用潜力的角色:范围审查
最近的工作概述了社会处方的定义,但社会处方链接工作者(SPLW)的角色仍然不明确。必须澄清这一作用的核心组成部分,以便能够研究其在将人们与社区支助联系起来方面的影响和随后的成果。本审查汇编和总结了已发表的关于人权高专办作用的资料。使用系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的荟萃分析完成范围评价。使用识别的术语检索合适的在线数据库,完成对识别论文的参考文献列表的审查,并通过谷歌Scholar识别相关的灰色文献。收集了英国社会处方网络和政府组织的相关报告。根据指定的标准确定每篇论文的资格。采用PCC (Population;概念;上下文)框架。在最初确定的251个搜索结果中,有15篇经过同行评审的论文符合纳入标准。另外还确定了来自政府和社区组织和网络的五份已发表的报告。数据以表格形式提取和整理。专题数据分析突出了四个共同主题,澄清了社会福利工作的作用,并确定了推进社会处方转诊进程所需的改进。(1) SPLW与参与者合作,确定个人需求和目标,并监测进展情况。(2)为服务使用者提供社区/法定支援。(3)人权观察以整体的方式看待健康问题。(4)培训社会福利工作者以及转介到该系统的人员对于改善转介过程的重要性。语言和角色的差异是显而易见的,这使得很难描述和比较社会处方服务中的角色。概述了培训的重要性,并提出了培训建议。需要进一步努力澄清社会处方中的作用、影响和培训要求,加强证据基础,并允许各服务之间的适用性和可转移性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Quality of Life Into Care for People Living With HIV: Developing a Core Outcome Set of Health and Social Well-Being Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical and Community Services Mental Risk-Taking of Students When Learning Mathematics by Gender: Proposing a Mental Risk-Taking Filter Model Insights Into Older Adults’ Preferences for Well-Being Programs Through Co-Design Preferences for Models of Care for Older People With High Care Needs: Survey of People Aged 50 years and Over in England Trauma-Informed Approaches to Violence Reduction: A Qualitative Exploration With Multiagency Partners in a Violence Reduction Unit in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1