Optimization of Path for Road Network With Modified Ant Colony Optimization (MACO)

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1002/cpe.8375
Raushan Kumar Singh, Mukesh Kumar
{"title":"Optimization of Path for Road Network With Modified Ant Colony Optimization (MACO)","authors":"Raushan Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Mukesh Kumar","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Optimizing routes in road networks is crucial for smooth transportation and economic progress. Different methods exist for finding the best routes, including genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, and simulated annealing. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) stands out for its efficiency. In this study, we introduce a modified version called MACO, which considers accidents when determining optimal routes. Evaluating different ACO versions reveals differences in solution quality, runtime, and number of iterations. Performance metrics including maximum obtained solution, runtime, and iteration number were evaluated for each method. In Case 1, TACO, and AACO both achieved a maximum of 21 solutions from the available possible solution of 24, exhibiting run-times of 0.4359 and 0.4575 s, respectively. Meanwhile, MACO attained a maximum of 22 solutions from available possible solution 24, in a runtime of 0.5345 s and 10 iterations. In the second scenario, TACO, AACO, and MACO achieved maximum solutions of 20 with obtained solutions of 15, 16, and 17, respectively. TACO demonstrated a runtime of 0.1853 s with 26 iterations, AACO ran in 0.1749 s with 22 iterations, and MACO completed in 0.5799 s with 15 iterations. These findings highlight the varying performance of the optimization methods and suggest MACO as a promising approach for balancing solution quality and computational efficiency in road network path optimization.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing routes in road networks is crucial for smooth transportation and economic progress. Different methods exist for finding the best routes, including genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, and simulated annealing. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) stands out for its efficiency. In this study, we introduce a modified version called MACO, which considers accidents when determining optimal routes. Evaluating different ACO versions reveals differences in solution quality, runtime, and number of iterations. Performance metrics including maximum obtained solution, runtime, and iteration number were evaluated for each method. In Case 1, TACO, and AACO both achieved a maximum of 21 solutions from the available possible solution of 24, exhibiting run-times of 0.4359 and 0.4575 s, respectively. Meanwhile, MACO attained a maximum of 22 solutions from available possible solution 24, in a runtime of 0.5345 s and 10 iterations. In the second scenario, TACO, AACO, and MACO achieved maximum solutions of 20 with obtained solutions of 15, 16, and 17, respectively. TACO demonstrated a runtime of 0.1853 s with 26 iterations, AACO ran in 0.1749 s with 22 iterations, and MACO completed in 0.5799 s with 15 iterations. These findings highlight the varying performance of the optimization methods and suggest MACO as a promising approach for balancing solution quality and computational efficiency in road network path optimization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
期刊最新文献
A Dynamic Energy-Efficient Scheduling Method for Periodic Workflows Based on Collaboration of Edge-Cloud Computing Resources An Innovative Performance Assessment Method for Increasing the Efficiency of AODV Routing Protocol in VANETs Through Colored Timed Petri Nets YOLOv8-ESW: An Improved Oncomelania hupensis Detection Model Three Party Post Quantum Secure Lattice Based Construction of Authenticated Key Establishment Protocol for Mobile Communication Unstructured Text Data Security Attribute Mining Method Based on Multi-Model Collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1