Optimization of Path for Road Network With Modified Ant Colony Optimization (MACO)

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1002/cpe.8375
Raushan Kumar Singh, Mukesh Kumar
{"title":"Optimization of Path for Road Network With Modified Ant Colony Optimization (MACO)","authors":"Raushan Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Mukesh Kumar","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Optimizing routes in road networks is crucial for smooth transportation and economic progress. Different methods exist for finding the best routes, including genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, and simulated annealing. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) stands out for its efficiency. In this study, we introduce a modified version called MACO, which considers accidents when determining optimal routes. Evaluating different ACO versions reveals differences in solution quality, runtime, and number of iterations. Performance metrics including maximum obtained solution, runtime, and iteration number were evaluated for each method. In Case 1, TACO, and AACO both achieved a maximum of 21 solutions from the available possible solution of 24, exhibiting run-times of 0.4359 and 0.4575 s, respectively. Meanwhile, MACO attained a maximum of 22 solutions from available possible solution 24, in a runtime of 0.5345 s and 10 iterations. In the second scenario, TACO, AACO, and MACO achieved maximum solutions of 20 with obtained solutions of 15, 16, and 17, respectively. TACO demonstrated a runtime of 0.1853 s with 26 iterations, AACO ran in 0.1749 s with 22 iterations, and MACO completed in 0.5799 s with 15 iterations. These findings highlight the varying performance of the optimization methods and suggest MACO as a promising approach for balancing solution quality and computational efficiency in road network path optimization.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing routes in road networks is crucial for smooth transportation and economic progress. Different methods exist for finding the best routes, including genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, and simulated annealing. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) stands out for its efficiency. In this study, we introduce a modified version called MACO, which considers accidents when determining optimal routes. Evaluating different ACO versions reveals differences in solution quality, runtime, and number of iterations. Performance metrics including maximum obtained solution, runtime, and iteration number were evaluated for each method. In Case 1, TACO, and AACO both achieved a maximum of 21 solutions from the available possible solution of 24, exhibiting run-times of 0.4359 and 0.4575 s, respectively. Meanwhile, MACO attained a maximum of 22 solutions from available possible solution 24, in a runtime of 0.5345 s and 10 iterations. In the second scenario, TACO, AACO, and MACO achieved maximum solutions of 20 with obtained solutions of 15, 16, and 17, respectively. TACO demonstrated a runtime of 0.1853 s with 26 iterations, AACO ran in 0.1749 s with 22 iterations, and MACO completed in 0.5799 s with 15 iterations. These findings highlight the varying performance of the optimization methods and suggest MACO as a promising approach for balancing solution quality and computational efficiency in road network path optimization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于改进蚁群算法的道路网络路径优化
路网路线的优化对交通运输的顺畅和经济的发展至关重要。寻找最佳路径的方法有遗传算法、粒子群优化和模拟退火等。蚁群优化算法(蚁群优化)以其高效而著称。在本研究中,我们引入了一个被称为MACO的改进版本,它在确定最优路线时考虑了事故。评估不同的ACO版本揭示了解决方案质量、运行时和迭代数量的差异。对每种方法的性能指标进行了评估,包括最大获得的解、运行时间和迭代次数。在Case 1中,TACO和AACO都从24个可用的可能解中获得了最多21个解,分别显示了0.4359和0.4575 s的运行时间。同时,MACO在0.5345秒的运行时间和10次迭代中,从可用的可能解24中获得了最多22个解。在第二种情况下,TACO、AACO和MACO的最大解为20,得到的解分别为15、16和17。TACO运行时间为0.1853 s,迭代26次;AACO运行时间为0.1749 s,迭代22次;MACO运行时间为0.5799 s,迭代15次。这些发现突出了优化方法的不同性能,并表明MACO是一种很有前途的方法,可以平衡解决方案的质量和道路网络路径优化的计算效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
期刊最新文献
Efficient Scheduling Algorithms for Multicore Cyclic Executives With Precedence and Exclusion Relations Multi-Step Temperature Prediction for a TGAL Regenerative Aluminum Smelting Furnace Enhancing Security and Privacy in Delay-Tolerant Networks Through the Use of Blockchain Technology Anomaly Detection in IoT Environments Using Machine Learning: A Bibliometric Review, Challenges, and Future Research Directions An Efficient Feature Selection Based Novel Deep Learning Models for Multi-Modal Sentimental Analysis in Social Media Platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1