Winter Ice-Wave Modeling With WAVEWATCH III in Lake Erie

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1029/2024JC021146
Haoguo Hu, Dan Titze, Ayumi Fujisaki-Manome, Bryan Mroczka, Jia Wang, Nathan Hawley, Sophie Orendorf, Kaitlyn Frank, Steve Ruberg
{"title":"Winter Ice-Wave Modeling With WAVEWATCH III in Lake Erie","authors":"Haoguo Hu,&nbsp;Dan Titze,&nbsp;Ayumi Fujisaki-Manome,&nbsp;Bryan Mroczka,&nbsp;Jia Wang,&nbsp;Nathan Hawley,&nbsp;Sophie Orendorf,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Frank,&nbsp;Steve Ruberg","doi":"10.1029/2024JC021146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Operational wave forecasts for the Great Lakes originate from the NOAA Great Lakes Waves Unstructured version 2 system. The model uses a simple ice blocking (IC0) parameterization for ice-wave damping, so ice-covered portions of the lakes are treated as land in the modeling system. Although simple and effective, the simple block can impede forecasting by eliminating wave forecast guidance from areas with thin or partial ice cover. We evaluate 12 ice-wave damping parameterizations within WAVEWATCH III (WW3, version 6.07.1) for Lake Erie, by comparing model results against wave observations made at several locations using moored acoustic wave and current profilers during the winters of 2010–2011 and 2012–2013. The comparisons show that the IC4M4 module performs the best among 12 ice modules with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.32–0.39 m and a root bias of −0.06 to −0.11 m, outperforming the existing IC0 parameterization (RMSE: 0.46–0.59 m; bias: −0.23 to −0.34 m) during the 2010–2011 analysis year. WW3 ice modules are mostly derived from measurements and studies of the Arctic and Antarctic Ocean. The dominant wave frequency is about 0.05∼0.10 Hz in the Arctic Ocean compared to 0.15∼0.2 Hz in the lake. Thus formulas built on frequency based on the studies from deep oceans may not be suitable for the shallow lakes because they cause too much damping. Although the IC4M4 ice module is from the study of the Antarctic Ocean , the wave attenuation formula based on incoming wave height is also suitable for Lake Erie.</p>","PeriodicalId":54340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JC021146","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JC021146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Operational wave forecasts for the Great Lakes originate from the NOAA Great Lakes Waves Unstructured version 2 system. The model uses a simple ice blocking (IC0) parameterization for ice-wave damping, so ice-covered portions of the lakes are treated as land in the modeling system. Although simple and effective, the simple block can impede forecasting by eliminating wave forecast guidance from areas with thin or partial ice cover. We evaluate 12 ice-wave damping parameterizations within WAVEWATCH III (WW3, version 6.07.1) for Lake Erie, by comparing model results against wave observations made at several locations using moored acoustic wave and current profilers during the winters of 2010–2011 and 2012–2013. The comparisons show that the IC4M4 module performs the best among 12 ice modules with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.32–0.39 m and a root bias of −0.06 to −0.11 m, outperforming the existing IC0 parameterization (RMSE: 0.46–0.59 m; bias: −0.23 to −0.34 m) during the 2010–2011 analysis year. WW3 ice modules are mostly derived from measurements and studies of the Arctic and Antarctic Ocean. The dominant wave frequency is about 0.05∼0.10 Hz in the Arctic Ocean compared to 0.15∼0.2 Hz in the lake. Thus formulas built on frequency based on the studies from deep oceans may not be suitable for the shallow lakes because they cause too much damping. Although the IC4M4 ice module is from the study of the Antarctic Ocean , the wave attenuation formula based on incoming wave height is also suitable for Lake Erie.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冬季冰波建模与WAVEWATCH III在伊利湖
五大湖的实际海浪预报来自NOAA的五大湖波浪非结构化版本2系统。该模型使用简单的冰阻塞(IC0)参数化来进行冰波阻尼,因此在建模系统中,湖泊被冰覆盖的部分被视为陆地。虽然简单有效,但简单的阻塞会阻碍预报,因为它消除了薄冰盖或部分冰盖地区的波浪预报指导。我们利用WAVEWATCH III (WW3,版本6.07.1)对伊利湖的12个冰波阻尼参数化进行了评估,将模型结果与2010-2011年和2012-2013年冬季在几个地点使用系泊声波和电流剖面仪进行的波浪观测结果进行了比较。对比表明,IC4M4模块在12个冰模块中表现最好,均方根误差(RMSE)为0.32 ~ 0.39 m,根偏差为- 0.06 ~ - 0.11 m,优于现有的IC0参数化(RMSE: 0.46 ~ 0.59 m;偏差:−0.23至−0.34 m)在2010-2011分析年。第三次世界大战的冰模主要来自对北极和南冰洋的测量和研究。北冰洋的主导波频率约为0.05 ~ 0.10 Hz,而湖泊的主导波频率为0.15 ~ 0.2 Hz。因此,基于深海研究建立的频率公式可能不适合浅水湖泊,因为它们会造成太多的阻尼。IC4M4冰模块虽然来自南冰洋的研究,但基于入射波高的波衰减公式也适用于伊利湖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
429
期刊最新文献
Reply to Comment by Cao and Yu on “Tidal Modulation of the Fraser River Plume” Distribution, Formation, and Evolution of Subsurface Secondary Acoustic Ducts From Global Ocean Modeling and Observations Cross-Boundary Heat and Freshwater Transports by Mesoscale Eddies in the Western Subpolar North Atlantic Field Observations of Sea Ice Thickening by Artificial Flooding Ocean Mesoscale Processes Heat Atmosphere Over the Western Boundary Currents and Their Extensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1