Correlation between dyslipidaemia and glaucoma risk: Insights from a population-based glaucoma screening (NCT 05875090)

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Acta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1111/aos.17130
Rafael Whitfield, Afonso Lima-Cabrita, Vasco Lobo, Bernardo Monteiro, Rodrigo Marques, Matilde Ourique, Inês Leal, Rafael Barão, Marta Pazos, Ingeborg Stalmans Stalmans, Luís Abegão-Pinto
{"title":"Correlation between dyslipidaemia and glaucoma risk: Insights from a population-based glaucoma screening (NCT 05875090)","authors":"Rafael Whitfield,&nbsp;Afonso Lima-Cabrita,&nbsp;Vasco Lobo,&nbsp;Bernardo Monteiro,&nbsp;Rodrigo Marques,&nbsp;Matilde Ourique,&nbsp;Inês Leal,&nbsp;Rafael Barão,&nbsp;Marta Pazos,&nbsp;Ingeborg Stalmans Stalmans,&nbsp;Luís Abegão-Pinto","doi":"10.1111/aos.17130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p><b>Aims/Purpose:</b> Glaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible blindness globally, is often associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). However, other risk factors may play a role, particular vascular related parameters. This investigation aimed to explore the association between glaucoma and dyslipidaemia (DL) in participants in a primary care screening pilot. NCT 05875090</p>\n \n <p><b>Methods:</b> analysis at screening visit comparing the odds of a positive referral between participants with and without DL. Secondary outcomes were medication with statins. Positive referral was defined by IOP≥24mmHg or AI≥0.73. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were used to compare the glaucoma proportions and IOP/AI means between groups. Significance was set at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p>\n \n <p><b>Results:</b> Data from 839 participants (54% male, 62 ± 4 years) across 11 functional units were analysed. Many had low educational attainment (69%), diabetes (81,1%), hypertension (63,4%), and DL (66,2%). Among participants with DL, 7,38% had glaucoma positive outcome at screening. No difference in glaucoma odds was found between DL and non-DL patients (OR 0.782; CI 0.400-1.528), nor between DL patients medicated with statins compared to those non-medicated (OR 2.083; CI 0.597-7.276). Interestingly, DL may be associated with a positive referral due to high IOP (but not disc damage) when compared to non-DL subjects (OR 0.404; CI 0.155-1.055; <i>p</i> = 0.09), but further analyses with larger samples are needed.</p>\n \n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Analysing the association between dyslipidaemia and glaucoma revealed a significant prevalence of DL, with 7,38% meeting positive referral criteria. While the study suggests a potential difference in glaucoma based on IOP between individuals with and without DL, this finding lacks statistical significance. Further analyses, including consideration of confounders and biases, are necessary for confirmation. Continued research and clinical observation are vital for a deeper understanding of this association.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"103 S284","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17130","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Purpose: Glaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible blindness globally, is often associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). However, other risk factors may play a role, particular vascular related parameters. This investigation aimed to explore the association between glaucoma and dyslipidaemia (DL) in participants in a primary care screening pilot. NCT 05875090

Methods: analysis at screening visit comparing the odds of a positive referral between participants with and without DL. Secondary outcomes were medication with statins. Positive referral was defined by IOP≥24mmHg or AI≥0.73. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were used to compare the glaucoma proportions and IOP/AI means between groups. Significance was set at p < 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Data from 839 participants (54% male, 62 ± 4 years) across 11 functional units were analysed. Many had low educational attainment (69%), diabetes (81,1%), hypertension (63,4%), and DL (66,2%). Among participants with DL, 7,38% had glaucoma positive outcome at screening. No difference in glaucoma odds was found between DL and non-DL patients (OR 0.782; CI 0.400-1.528), nor between DL patients medicated with statins compared to those non-medicated (OR 2.083; CI 0.597-7.276). Interestingly, DL may be associated with a positive referral due to high IOP (but not disc damage) when compared to non-DL subjects (OR 0.404; CI 0.155-1.055; p = 0.09), but further analyses with larger samples are needed.

Conclusions: Analysing the association between dyslipidaemia and glaucoma revealed a significant prevalence of DL, with 7,38% meeting positive referral criteria. While the study suggests a potential difference in glaucoma based on IOP between individuals with and without DL, this finding lacks statistical significance. Further analyses, including consideration of confounders and biases, are necessary for confirmation. Continued research and clinical observation are vital for a deeper understanding of this association.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血脂异常与青光眼风险的相关性:基于人群的青光眼筛查(NCT 05875090)
目的/目的:青光眼是全球不可逆性失明的主要原因,通常与眼压升高(IOP)相关。然而,其他危险因素也可能起作用,特别是血管相关参数。本研究旨在探讨青光眼和血脂异常(DL)在初级保健筛查试点参与者之间的关系。方法:在筛查访问时分析比较有和没有DL的参与者之间的积极转诊的几率。次要结果是他汀类药物。IOP≥24mmHg或AI≥0.73定义为阳性转诊。采用描述性和双变量分析比较各组间青光眼比例和IOP/AI平均值。p < 0.05, 95%可信区间(CI)。结果:分析了来自11个功能单位的839名参与者(54%男性,62±4岁)的数据。许多人受教育程度低(69%),患有糖尿病(81.1%),高血压(63.3%)和深度糖尿病(66.2%)。在DL患者中,7.38%的筛查结果为青光眼阳性。轻度糖尿病患者与非重度糖尿病患者青光眼发生率无差异(OR 0.782;CI 0.400-1.528),服用他汀类药物的DL患者与未服用他汀类药物的DL患者之间没有差异(OR 2.083;可信区间0.597 - -7.276)。有趣的是,与非深度DL受试者相比,由于高IOP(而非椎间盘损伤),深度DL患者可能与积极转诊相关(OR 0.404;可信区间0.155 - -1.055;P = 0.09),但需要更大样本的进一步分析。结论:分析血脂异常和青光眼之间的关系揭示了DL的显著患病率,7.38%的患者符合阳性转诊标准。虽然该研究表明,基于IOP的青光眼在DL患者和非DL患者之间存在潜在差异,但这一发现缺乏统计学意义。进一步的分析,包括考虑混杂因素和偏差,是确认的必要条件。持续的研究和临床观察对于更深入地了解这种关联至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
期刊最新文献
A modified protocol for fluid collection during diagnostic vitrectomy improves the quality of specimens in vitreoretinal lymphoma patients. Characterising PRPF31-associated retinal dystrophy: Clinical insights from baseline data in a natural history study. A randomized clinical trial on the effectiveness of plano spectacle lenses with lenslets on myopia prevention in pre-myopic children: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Topiramate-induced acute angle closure with suprachoroidal effusion: Insights from a novel ultra-wide-field OCT device. The longitudinal associations of reading, writing and screen time with myopia at age 9 years among children from the GUSTO birth cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1