Preclinical evaluation on the biocompatibility and biosafety of a new foldable brown-diaphragm intraocular lens: An in vitro and in vivo study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Acta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1111/aos.17298
Keke Zhang, Shaohua Zhang, Wenwen He, Yi Lu, Xiangjia Zhu
{"title":"Preclinical evaluation on the biocompatibility and biosafety of a new foldable brown-diaphragm intraocular lens: An in vitro and in vivo study","authors":"Keke Zhang,&nbsp;Shaohua Zhang,&nbsp;Wenwen He,&nbsp;Yi Lu,&nbsp;Xiangjia Zhu","doi":"10.1111/aos.17298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p><b>Aims/Purpose:</b> A new foldable brown-diaphragm intraocular lens (IOL) was preclinically evaluated in vitro and in vivo by comparing its biocompatibility and biosafety with those of a commercially available IOL.</p>\n \n <p><b>Methods:</b> The new brown-diaphragm IOL is made of hydrophobic acrylic material, with incorporating a transparent optical zone and surrounding brown diaphragm. Cellular experiments evaluating lens epithelial cell morphology, adhesion, and migration were conducted to exclude cytotoxic effects. Twelve New Zealand rabbits had the new brown-diaphragm IOL implanted in one eye and another 12 had a commercially available foldable IOL implanted, followed by slit-lamp evaluations, corneal endothelial cells density measurement and aqueous humor analysis to identify any dye leakage from the brown-diaphragm IOL. Haematoxylin and eosin staining of ocular tissue and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the IOL surface were performed after 12-week observation.</p>\n \n <p><b>Results:</b> In vivo experiments showed there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative inflammation and capsular biocompatibility. There were no significant changes in corneal endothelial cell density between before and after surgery in either group. LC-MS/MS analysis showed that the target dye was not detected in aqueous humor samples. Histopathology of ocular sections and SEM imaging of IOL surfaces showed similar changes in both groups.</p>\n \n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The newly-invented brown-diaphragm IOL showed good biocompatibility and biosafety. Combined with its foldability and peripheral shading, it could be a new choice for patients with iris defects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"103 S284","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17298","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Purpose: A new foldable brown-diaphragm intraocular lens (IOL) was preclinically evaluated in vitro and in vivo by comparing its biocompatibility and biosafety with those of a commercially available IOL.

Methods: The new brown-diaphragm IOL is made of hydrophobic acrylic material, with incorporating a transparent optical zone and surrounding brown diaphragm. Cellular experiments evaluating lens epithelial cell morphology, adhesion, and migration were conducted to exclude cytotoxic effects. Twelve New Zealand rabbits had the new brown-diaphragm IOL implanted in one eye and another 12 had a commercially available foldable IOL implanted, followed by slit-lamp evaluations, corneal endothelial cells density measurement and aqueous humor analysis to identify any dye leakage from the brown-diaphragm IOL. Haematoxylin and eosin staining of ocular tissue and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the IOL surface were performed after 12-week observation.

Results: In vivo experiments showed there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative inflammation and capsular biocompatibility. There were no significant changes in corneal endothelial cell density between before and after surgery in either group. LC-MS/MS analysis showed that the target dye was not detected in aqueous humor samples. Histopathology of ocular sections and SEM imaging of IOL surfaces showed similar changes in both groups.

Conclusions: The newly-invented brown-diaphragm IOL showed good biocompatibility and biosafety. Combined with its foldability and peripheral shading, it could be a new choice for patients with iris defects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
期刊最新文献
Tracking visual outcomes - Follow-up on patients born preterm with childhood-onset visual impairment. Comparison of AI-based retinal fluid monitoring in neovascular age-related macular degeneration with manual assessment by different eye care professionals under optimized conditions. Incidence of postoperative retinal detachment and bacterial endophthalmitis in the Swedish national paediatric cataract register and associated risk factors. Prototype master protocol for benchmarking of real-world follow-up data in glaucoma. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1