Intrarenal pressure monitoring via flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A preclinical animal study and a pilot clinical study

Wei Zhu, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Jianwei Cao, Chu Ann Chai, Shusheng Liu, Jingzeng Du, Wen Zhong, Zhijian Zhao, Yongda Liu, Guohua Zeng
{"title":"Intrarenal pressure monitoring via flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A preclinical animal study and a pilot clinical study","authors":"Wei Zhu,&nbsp;Steffi Kar Kei Yuen,&nbsp;Jianwei Cao,&nbsp;Chu Ann Chai,&nbsp;Shusheng Liu,&nbsp;Jingzeng Du,&nbsp;Wen Zhong,&nbsp;Zhijian Zhao,&nbsp;Yongda Liu,&nbsp;Guohua Zeng","doi":"10.1002/ctd2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) can lead to deleterious complications. Emerging non-invasive, real-time IRP monitoring tools are proving crucial for enhancing procedural safety. This study evaluates a newly developed flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) with IRP monitoring capabilities through animal study and a clinical trial, assessing its accuracy and operational benefits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A preclinical animal study and a prospective clinical trial involving 100 patients were conducted. The animal study confirmed the accuracy of IRP-monitoring FANS, whilst the clinical trial compared its performance to conventional FANS in RIRS. The evaluated outcomes included the accuracy of IRP measurements, the irrigation flow rate, the duration of the operation, and the stone-free rate (SFR). Statistical comparisons were performed using appropriate tests with a significant threshold of <i>p</i> &lt; .05. Registration for this study is recorded under the identifier NCT06729801 at ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the animal study, IRP-monitoring FANS demonstrated high accuracy in real-time IRP measurement, comparable to percutaneous nephrostomy-based monitoring. In the clinical study, IRP-monitoring FANS enabled increased irrigation flow whilst maintaining safe IRP levels within 30 mmHg. Operative time was significantly shortened in IRP-monitoring FANS group (50.9 vs. 67.6 min, <i>p</i> &lt; .01), with similar SFRs between groups. No notable discrepancies in the rates of complications were observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The IRP-monitoring FANS improves stone retrieval efficiency and shortens operative time whilst ensuring safety through real-time IRP monitoring. This novel device marks a major improvement in both the safety and effectiveness of RIRS for managing large renal stones.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72605,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and translational discovery","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ctd2.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and translational discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctd2.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) can lead to deleterious complications. Emerging non-invasive, real-time IRP monitoring tools are proving crucial for enhancing procedural safety. This study evaluates a newly developed flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) with IRP monitoring capabilities through animal study and a clinical trial, assessing its accuracy and operational benefits.

Methods

A preclinical animal study and a prospective clinical trial involving 100 patients were conducted. The animal study confirmed the accuracy of IRP-monitoring FANS, whilst the clinical trial compared its performance to conventional FANS in RIRS. The evaluated outcomes included the accuracy of IRP measurements, the irrigation flow rate, the duration of the operation, and the stone-free rate (SFR). Statistical comparisons were performed using appropriate tests with a significant threshold of p < .05. Registration for this study is recorded under the identifier NCT06729801 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Results

In the animal study, IRP-monitoring FANS demonstrated high accuracy in real-time IRP measurement, comparable to percutaneous nephrostomy-based monitoring. In the clinical study, IRP-monitoring FANS enabled increased irrigation flow whilst maintaining safe IRP levels within 30 mmHg. Operative time was significantly shortened in IRP-monitoring FANS group (50.9 vs. 67.6 min, p < .01), with similar SFRs between groups. No notable discrepancies in the rates of complications were observed.

Conclusions

The IRP-monitoring FANS improves stone retrieval efficiency and shortens operative time whilst ensuring safety through real-time IRP monitoring. This novel device marks a major improvement in both the safety and effectiveness of RIRS for managing large renal stones.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From multi-omics to cancer digital twins: Novel paradigm in cancer research and treatment response Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis: Mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic perspectives Utilising single-cell sequencing in clinical nutraceutical research: Recent progress and perspectives Intrarenal pressure monitoring via flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A preclinical animal study and a pilot clinical study Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1