Structuring the Prison Life Index Through Value Focused Thinking Methodology

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1002/mcda.70003
Lola Martin-Moro, Meltem Öztürk, Florence Laufer
{"title":"Structuring the Prison Life Index Through Value Focused Thinking Methodology","authors":"Lola Martin-Moro,&nbsp;Meltem Öztürk,&nbsp;Florence Laufer","doi":"10.1002/mcda.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Building a composite index (CI) is a task that requiring a series of decisions, the consequences of which will determine the scope of the tool. This is especially true for the very first steps of this construction: the definition of the theoretical framework and the selection of relevant indicators, usually referred to as the construction of the structure. However, the literature seems to focus more on the other aspects, quite often eluding those first steps or considering it a self-evident process. How to ensure the soundness of those tools when the values that they convey are not even clearly expressed? How to ensure the completeness of the structure according to the reality that it ought to synthesise when it is a highly complex or abstract one? Each of these steps involves hypotheses and presuppositions that must be explained and evaluated with care. In this article, we seek to identify a coherent method that will allow us to build the structure of CI answering those demands. The construction of a composite indicator can be conceptualised as a multi-criteria decision aiding problem (MCDA), given that it entails the aggregation of evaluations pertaining to distinct attributes. The MCDA is rich in structuring methodologies, such as Ralph Keeney's Value Focused Thinking (VFT) approach. Using a real-life application, the construction of the Prison Life Index (PLI), we try to show the relevance of those primary hypotheses by displaying the structure of the index and summarising the stage of its construction. This adapted methodology can guide index builders in the determination of a structure that comprehensively fits its intended purpose and that is not overly dependent on available data. Our article endeavours to underscore the importance of the structuring phase, arguing that it should take priority according to the ethical and moral values of the decision-maker. It should not be solely reliant on data availability, as it is the case with most composite indices. We demonstrate, through the implementation of the PLI structure developed using VFT, that it can achieve a high degree of conformity with internationally established standards pertaining to human rights. This approach not only facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the interconnections among various normative texts but also provides jurists with a visual representation of these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mcda.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.70003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building a composite index (CI) is a task that requiring a series of decisions, the consequences of which will determine the scope of the tool. This is especially true for the very first steps of this construction: the definition of the theoretical framework and the selection of relevant indicators, usually referred to as the construction of the structure. However, the literature seems to focus more on the other aspects, quite often eluding those first steps or considering it a self-evident process. How to ensure the soundness of those tools when the values that they convey are not even clearly expressed? How to ensure the completeness of the structure according to the reality that it ought to synthesise when it is a highly complex or abstract one? Each of these steps involves hypotheses and presuppositions that must be explained and evaluated with care. In this article, we seek to identify a coherent method that will allow us to build the structure of CI answering those demands. The construction of a composite indicator can be conceptualised as a multi-criteria decision aiding problem (MCDA), given that it entails the aggregation of evaluations pertaining to distinct attributes. The MCDA is rich in structuring methodologies, such as Ralph Keeney's Value Focused Thinking (VFT) approach. Using a real-life application, the construction of the Prison Life Index (PLI), we try to show the relevance of those primary hypotheses by displaying the structure of the index and summarising the stage of its construction. This adapted methodology can guide index builders in the determination of a structure that comprehensively fits its intended purpose and that is not overly dependent on available data. Our article endeavours to underscore the importance of the structuring phase, arguing that it should take priority according to the ethical and moral values of the decision-maker. It should not be solely reliant on data availability, as it is the case with most composite indices. We demonstrate, through the implementation of the PLI structure developed using VFT, that it can achieve a high degree of conformity with internationally established standards pertaining to human rights. This approach not only facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the interconnections among various normative texts but also provides jurists with a visual representation of these relationships.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Structuring the Prison Life Index Through Value Focused Thinking Methodology Issue Information Exploring Barriers to Innovative Marketing in MSMEs: An Analysis Using a BWM-ISM Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework Efficiency Criteria for Multicost Variational Models Driven by H-Type I Functionals Why We Need Desirable Properties in Pairwise Comparison Methods?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1