Prognostic Analysis of Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Patients Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1155/ijcp/8833803
Shuangyue Wang, Heqing Huang, Fengqiao Huang, Haiyan Wu, Zhiru Li, Ziyan Zhou, Min Kang
{"title":"Prognostic Analysis of Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Patients Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy","authors":"Shuangyue Wang,&nbsp;Heqing Huang,&nbsp;Fengqiao Huang,&nbsp;Haiyan Wu,&nbsp;Zhiru Li,&nbsp;Ziyan Zhou,&nbsp;Min Kang","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/8833803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> We investigated a visual model for estimating prognosis in older patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and analyzed the survival rates in different patient groups during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Between January 2012 and March 2021, patients with NPC aged &gt; 65 years who received IMRT and were initially diagnosed with no distant metastases were enrolled. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, including age, sex, tumor stage, and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). A nomogram was constructed based on the determined prognostic factors, and prediction accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> In total, 140 patients were included in the analysis (median age: 69 years; range: 66–81 years). The median follow-up was 84.9 (26.2–131.5) months. Compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemotherapy during RT failed to improve OS (54.2% vs. 50.0%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.969), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (59.1% vs. 60.5%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.712), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) (66.7% vs. 70.5%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.824), or locoregional relapse–free survival (LRFS) (85.0% vs. 86.9%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.811). After the final regression analysis, age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score, N stage, and total stage were identified as independent factors affecting OS prognosis. The OS nomogram was applied to the data and, based on the value of the area under the ROC and calibration curves, demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Survival outcomes in older patients with NPC treated with RT alone were similar to those in patients treated with both chemotherapy and RT. Our nomogram had good performance in predicting OS in older patients with NPC and may benefit the clinical decision-making process.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/8833803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/8833803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We investigated a visual model for estimating prognosis in older patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and analyzed the survival rates in different patient groups during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Methods: Between January 2012 and March 2021, patients with NPC aged > 65 years who received IMRT and were initially diagnosed with no distant metastases were enrolled. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, including age, sex, tumor stage, and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). A nomogram was constructed based on the determined prognostic factors, and prediction accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves.

Results: In total, 140 patients were included in the analysis (median age: 69 years; range: 66–81 years). The median follow-up was 84.9 (26.2–131.5) months. Compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemotherapy during RT failed to improve OS (54.2% vs. 50.0%, respectively; p = 0.969), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (59.1% vs. 60.5%, respectively; p = 0.712), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) (66.7% vs. 70.5%, respectively; p = 0.824), or locoregional relapse–free survival (LRFS) (85.0% vs. 86.9%, respectively; p = 0.811). After the final regression analysis, age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score, N stage, and total stage were identified as independent factors affecting OS prognosis. The OS nomogram was applied to the data and, based on the value of the area under the ROC and calibration curves, demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance.

Conclusions: Survival outcomes in older patients with NPC treated with RT alone were similar to those in patients treated with both chemotherapy and RT. Our nomogram had good performance in predicting OS in older patients with NPC and may benefit the clinical decision-making process.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受调强放疗的老年鼻咽癌非转移性预后分析
背景:我们研究了一种用于估计老年非转移性鼻咽癌(NPC)患者预后的视觉模型,并分析了不同患者组在调强放疗(IMRT)期间的生存率。方法:2012年1月至2021年3月期间,年龄为>;65名接受IMRT且最初诊断为无远处转移的患者被纳入研究。采用1:1匹配的倾向评分分析来平衡基线特征,包括年龄、性别、肿瘤分期和合并症。Kaplan-Meier分析计算生存率。采用Cox回归分析确定影响总生存期(OS)的独立预后因素。根据确定的预后因素构建nomogram,并利用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)和校准曲线对预测精度进行评价。结果:共纳入140例患者(中位年龄:69岁;年龄范围:66-81岁)。中位随访时间为84.9(26.2-131.5)个月。与单纯放疗(RT)相比,RT期间化疗未能改善OS(分别为54.2%和50.0%;p = 0.969),癌症特异性生存率(CSS)分别为59.1%∶60.5%;p = 0.712),远处无转移生存率(DMFS)(分别为66.7% vs. 70.5%;p = 0.824),或局部无复发生存率(LRFS)(分别为85.0%和86.9%;P = 0.811)。最终回归分析,年龄、年龄校正Charlson合并症指数(ACCI)评分、N分期、总分期为影响OS预后的独立因素。将OS nomogram应用于数据,基于ROC下面积和校准曲线的值,显示出令人满意的预测性能。结论:单独接受放疗的老年鼻咽癌患者的生存结果与同时接受化疗和放疗的患者相似。我们的nomogram (nomogram)在预测老年鼻咽癌患者的OS方面表现良好,可能有利于临床决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Sepsis Through Integration of Single-Cell Sequencing and Transcriptome Sequencing “Back to the Past of Nursing”: A Qualitative Study of Nursing Professional Identity During the Prolonged COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Laparoscopically Administered Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane and Rectus Sheath Blocks in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial Anesthesiologists’ Knowledge and Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Patient-Controlled Analgesia (AI-PCA) Management Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients With Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1