Relationship Between TEC Perturbations and Rayleigh Waves Associated With 2023 Turkey Earthquake Doublet

IF 2.9 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1029/2024JA033267
Huan Rao, Chieh-Hung Chen, Guojie Meng, Jing Liu, Yang-Yi Sun, Kai Lin, Yongxin Gao, Yuriy Rapoport, Fei Wang, Aisa Yisimayili, Shengjia Zhang
{"title":"Relationship Between TEC Perturbations and Rayleigh Waves Associated With 2023 Turkey Earthquake Doublet","authors":"Huan Rao,&nbsp;Chieh-Hung Chen,&nbsp;Guojie Meng,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Yang-Yi Sun,&nbsp;Kai Lin,&nbsp;Yongxin Gao,&nbsp;Yuriy Rapoport,&nbsp;Fei Wang,&nbsp;Aisa Yisimayili,&nbsp;Shengjia Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2024JA033267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An earthquake doublet occurred in Turkey on 6 February 2023, with propagating Rayleigh waves triggering perturbations in the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) for both the M 7.8 earthquake (EQ7.8) and the M 7.5 earthquake (EQ7.5). A discrepancy between the velocities of TEC perturbations and Rayleigh waves has been noted, but its causes remain unresolved in previous studies. In this study, we calculated the velocities of TEC perturbations and the frequency-dependent velocities of Rayleigh waves, considering their intrinsic dispersive characteristics. To retrieve TEC, we utilized ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data from geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) satellites to mitigate the effects of moving ionospheric pierce points (IPPs) from orbiting satellites. The results reveal that the velocities of TEC perturbations (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>2.60 km/s for EQ7.8 and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\sim} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>2.77 km/s for EQ7.5) do not align with the velocities of Rayleigh waves across the entire frequency band (2.4–3.0 km/s for EQ7.8 and 2.6–3.5 km/s for EQ7.5). However, they are comparable within specific periods of 10–30 s due to dispersion effects for both EQ7.8 and EQ7.5. The dispersive Rayleigh waves, which exhibit significant amplification in the 10–30 s period range, are identified as the primary source of the pronounced coseismic TEC perturbations, particularly for EQ7.5.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An earthquake doublet occurred in Turkey on 6 February 2023, with propagating Rayleigh waves triggering perturbations in the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) for both the M 7.8 earthquake (EQ7.8) and the M 7.5 earthquake (EQ7.5). A discrepancy between the velocities of TEC perturbations and Rayleigh waves has been noted, but its causes remain unresolved in previous studies. In this study, we calculated the velocities of TEC perturbations and the frequency-dependent velocities of Rayleigh waves, considering their intrinsic dispersive characteristics. To retrieve TEC, we utilized ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data from geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) satellites to mitigate the effects of moving ionospheric pierce points (IPPs) from orbiting satellites. The results reveal that the velocities of TEC perturbations ( ${\sim} $ 2.60 km/s for EQ7.8 and ${\sim} $ 2.77 km/s for EQ7.5) do not align with the velocities of Rayleigh waves across the entire frequency band (2.4–3.0 km/s for EQ7.8 and 2.6–3.5 km/s for EQ7.5). However, they are comparable within specific periods of 10–30 s due to dispersion effects for both EQ7.8 and EQ7.5. The dispersive Rayleigh waves, which exhibit significant amplification in the 10–30 s period range, are identified as the primary source of the pronounced coseismic TEC perturbations, particularly for EQ7.5.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2023年土耳其双重地震TEC扰动与瑞利波的关系
2023年2月6日,土耳其发生了一次双重地震,在7.8级地震(EQ7.8)和7.5级地震(EQ7.5)中,瑞利波的传播引发了电离层总电子含量(TEC)的扰动。TEC扰动速度与瑞利波速度之间的差异已被注意到,但其原因在以前的研究中尚未得到解决。在这项研究中,我们计算了TEC扰动的速度和瑞利波的频率相关速度,考虑了它们的本征色散特性。为了获取TEC,我们利用地球静止轨道(GEO)卫星的地面全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)数据来减轻轨道卫星移动电离层穿孔点(ipp)的影响。结果表明,TEC扰动的速度(EQ7.8的~ ${\sim} $ 2.60 km/s和EQ7.5的~ ${\sim} $ 2.77 km/s)与瑞利波在整个频段的速度(EQ7.8的2.4-3.0 km/s和EQ7.5的2.6-3.5 km/s)不一致。然而,由于EQ7.8和EQ7.5的分散效应,它们在10-30 s的特定时间段内具有可比性。色散瑞利波在10 ~ 30 s周期范围内表现出明显的放大,被认为是明显的同震TEC扰动的主要来源,特别是EQ7.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
期刊最新文献
Influence of Diurnal Tide on the Low-Latitude UMLT Mean Zonal Wind: Evidence From Momentum Flux Estimation Using ICON/MIGHTI Winds Mid- and High-Latitude Ionospheric Responses to the Mother's Day Super Geomagnetic Storm of 2024 Using VLF Propagation and Satellite Data Spatial and Energy Dependence of Energetic Electron Precipitation Originating From Jupiter's Inner and Middle Magnetosphere New Constraints on the Jovian Narrowband Radio Components From Juno/Waves Observations and 3D Geometrical Simulations Multi-Timescale Responses of the EEJ to Energy Deposition in the Auroral Region During the 10 May 2024 Superstorm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1