Effectiveness of canine-assisted surveillance and human searches for early detection of invasive spotted lanternfly

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70113
Angela K. Fuller, Ben C. Augustine, Eric H. Clifton, Ann E. Hajek, Arden Blumenthal, Josh Beese, Aimee Hurt, Carrie J. Brown-Lima
{"title":"Effectiveness of canine-assisted surveillance and human searches for early detection of invasive spotted lanternfly","authors":"Angela K. Fuller,&nbsp;Ben C. Augustine,&nbsp;Eric H. Clifton,&nbsp;Ann E. Hajek,&nbsp;Arden Blumenthal,&nbsp;Josh Beese,&nbsp;Aimee Hurt,&nbsp;Carrie J. Brown-Lima","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prevention and early detection of invasive species are championed as the most cost-effective and efficient strategies for reducing or preventing negative impacts on ecosystems. Spotted lanternfly (SLF), <i>Lycorma delicatula</i>, is a recently introduced invasive insect whose range in the United States has been expanding rapidly since it was first discovered in Pennsylvania in 2014. Feeding by this planthopper can cause severe impacts on agricultural production, particularly grapes (<i>Vitis</i> spp.). Human visual surveys are the most common search method employed for detection but can be ineffective due to the insect's cryptic egg masses and low density during early stages of infestation. Therefore, finding alternative early detection methods has become a priority for agencies tasked with addressing SLF management. This study experimentally tested whether trained detector dogs could improve the probability of detecting SLF in both agricultural and forest settings. We surveyed transects in 20 vineyards and their adjacent wooded areas in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, USA, and used a multiscale occupancy model to estimate detection probability achieved by human observers and detection dogs as a function of SLF infestation level, weather, and habitat covariates. We modeled transect-level occupancy of SLF as a function of infestation level, habitat type, topographic position index, and distance to forests. Occupancy probability of SLF was higher on vines within vineyards than in forests, and occupancy declined with increasing distance from forests, which is informative for future search efforts. Detection probability of SLF was lower at forested sites but was higher at high infestation sites. Detection dogs had a lower detection probability than humans in the vineyards, but the detection probability of dogs was &gt;3× greater than that of humans in forested sites. Our study suggests that detection dogs are more effective than human visual searches as an early detection method for SLF in forested areas, and utilizing detector dogs could strengthen SLF early detection efforts. This study demonstrates the potential applicability of using canine-assisted search strategies combined with occupancy models to enhance the surveillance and prevention of other difficult-to-detect invasive species.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prevention and early detection of invasive species are championed as the most cost-effective and efficient strategies for reducing or preventing negative impacts on ecosystems. Spotted lanternfly (SLF), Lycorma delicatula, is a recently introduced invasive insect whose range in the United States has been expanding rapidly since it was first discovered in Pennsylvania in 2014. Feeding by this planthopper can cause severe impacts on agricultural production, particularly grapes (Vitis spp.). Human visual surveys are the most common search method employed for detection but can be ineffective due to the insect's cryptic egg masses and low density during early stages of infestation. Therefore, finding alternative early detection methods has become a priority for agencies tasked with addressing SLF management. This study experimentally tested whether trained detector dogs could improve the probability of detecting SLF in both agricultural and forest settings. We surveyed transects in 20 vineyards and their adjacent wooded areas in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, USA, and used a multiscale occupancy model to estimate detection probability achieved by human observers and detection dogs as a function of SLF infestation level, weather, and habitat covariates. We modeled transect-level occupancy of SLF as a function of infestation level, habitat type, topographic position index, and distance to forests. Occupancy probability of SLF was higher on vines within vineyards than in forests, and occupancy declined with increasing distance from forests, which is informative for future search efforts. Detection probability of SLF was lower at forested sites but was higher at high infestation sites. Detection dogs had a lower detection probability than humans in the vineyards, but the detection probability of dogs was >3× greater than that of humans in forested sites. Our study suggests that detection dogs are more effective than human visual searches as an early detection method for SLF in forested areas, and utilizing detector dogs could strengthen SLF early detection efforts. This study demonstrates the potential applicability of using canine-assisted search strategies combined with occupancy models to enhance the surveillance and prevention of other difficult-to-detect invasive species.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犬类辅助监测和人类搜索对入侵斑点灯笼蝇早期发现的有效性
预防和早期发现入侵物种被认为是减少或防止对生态系统产生负面影响的最具成本效益和最有效的策略。斑点灯笼蝇(SLF), Lycorma delicatula,是一种最近引进的入侵昆虫,自2014年在宾夕法尼亚州首次发现以来,其在美国的范围迅速扩大。这种飞虱的摄食会对农业生产,特别是葡萄造成严重影响。人类视觉调查是最常用的检测方法,但由于昆虫的隐卵团和低密度在感染的早期阶段可能是无效的。因此,寻找替代的早期检测方法已成为负责处理SLF管理的机构的优先事项。本研究通过实验测试了经过训练的检测犬是否可以提高在农业和森林环境中检测SLF的概率。我们调查了美国宾夕法尼亚州和新泽西州20个葡萄园及其邻近林区的样带,并使用一个多尺度占用模型来估计人类观察者和检测犬在SLF感染水平、天气和栖息地协变量下的检测概率。我们建立了基于虫害水平、生境类型、地形位置指数和与森林距离的样带水平占用率模型。SLF在葡萄园内的占用率高于在森林中的占用率,并且占用率随距离森林的增加而下降,这为未来的搜索工作提供了信息。在有森林的地点,SLF的检出率较低,而在高发地点,SLF的检出率较高。在葡萄园中,犬类的检出率低于人类,而在森林中,犬类的检出率是人类的3倍。我们的研究表明,作为森林地区SLF的早期检测方法,探测犬比人类视觉搜索更有效,利用探测犬可以加强SLF的早期检测工作。本研究证明了犬类辅助搜索策略与占用模型相结合的潜在适用性,以加强对其他难以发现的入侵物种的监测和预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Relative pollen productivity estimates from India: A step towards quantitative reconstruction of past plant abundance The influence of environmental conditions on the selection of spring migration routes by caribou Carduus nutans and Carduus acanthoides, two invasive thistle species, strongly rebound from disturbances Early life exposure to the antibiotic tetracycline alters in-hive development of the adult honey bee gut microbiome Research on the spatiotemporal dynamics and the recreation spatial equity of China's nature reserves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1