Perceptions and attitudes about advance care planning among healthcare professionals of cardiac care: A Q methodology study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Japan Journal of Nursing Science Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1111/jjns.12641
Hana Ko, Yoon Young Hwang, Seongkum Heo, KyungAh Cho, Mi-Seung Shin, Mi Yeong Kim, JinShil Kim
{"title":"Perceptions and attitudes about advance care planning among healthcare professionals of cardiac care: A Q methodology study","authors":"Hana Ko,&nbsp;Yoon Young Hwang,&nbsp;Seongkum Heo,&nbsp;KyungAh Cho,&nbsp;Mi-Seung Shin,&nbsp;Mi Yeong Kim,&nbsp;JinShil Kim","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Healthcare professionals' perspectives on advance care planning (ACP) remain unclear, particularly among those who care for cardiac patients. Therefore, this study aimed to explore perspectives on ACP among healthcare professionals who provide care to patients with cardiovascular diseases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Using Q methodology, 40-Q sample statements were derived from an extensive literature review and an in-depth qualitative interview. The P-sample (Q sorters) comprised 10 physicians and 14 nurses. The P-sample filled each grid with a statement on the Q-sorting table. The data were analyzed using the PQMethod.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four factors with 18 Q sorters emerged and explained 71% of the variance, each contributing 5%–53%. Four factors were labeled: healthcare professional-led, communication-focused ACP (<i>n</i> = 5); early application-weighted, burden-reducing ACP (<i>n</i> = 5); prognostic uncertainty-based, negotiation-focused ACP (<i>n</i> = 5); and patient-value-based, comprehensiveness-focused ACP (<i>n</i> = 3); six Q sorters fell into either confounded or nonsignificant categories. Common perspectives on ACP across all factors emerged, including the conceptual definition of ACP, early employment of ACP as the right time, and needs for educational support and training.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Unique perspectives and common perspectives on ACP across factors emerged among Korean healthcare professionals of cardiac patients. The findings of this study provide initial information on perceptions of and attitudes toward ACP among Korean healthcare providers. Healthcare providers can use these findings to provide educational support and training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.12641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on advance care planning (ACP) remain unclear, particularly among those who care for cardiac patients. Therefore, this study aimed to explore perspectives on ACP among healthcare professionals who provide care to patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Method

Using Q methodology, 40-Q sample statements were derived from an extensive literature review and an in-depth qualitative interview. The P-sample (Q sorters) comprised 10 physicians and 14 nurses. The P-sample filled each grid with a statement on the Q-sorting table. The data were analyzed using the PQMethod.

Results

Four factors with 18 Q sorters emerged and explained 71% of the variance, each contributing 5%–53%. Four factors were labeled: healthcare professional-led, communication-focused ACP (n = 5); early application-weighted, burden-reducing ACP (n = 5); prognostic uncertainty-based, negotiation-focused ACP (n = 5); and patient-value-based, comprehensiveness-focused ACP (n = 3); six Q sorters fell into either confounded or nonsignificant categories. Common perspectives on ACP across all factors emerged, including the conceptual definition of ACP, early employment of ACP as the right time, and needs for educational support and training.

Conclusions

Unique perspectives and common perspectives on ACP across factors emerged among Korean healthcare professionals of cardiac patients. The findings of this study provide initial information on perceptions of and attitudes toward ACP among Korean healthcare providers. Healthcare providers can use these findings to provide educational support and training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
期刊最新文献
Sexual satisfaction and associated factors among patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Japan Pregnant nurses' occupational stress and associated factors: A comparative cross-sectional study with other healthcare workers, physical workers, and desk workers Effects of light-intensity physical activity on health-related outcomes in cancer survivors: A systematic review Issue Information Effects of a Tanzanian prenatal group education program about preeclampsia/eclampsia: A quasi-experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1