Seismic Safety Evaluation of a Full-Size Reinforced Concrete Frame Infilled With Precast Modular Reinforced Blocks Using Pseudo-Dynamic Testing and Nonlinear Dynamic Finite Element Analysis

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4279
Ju-Seong Jung, Kang-Seok Lee
{"title":"Seismic Safety Evaluation of a Full-Size Reinforced Concrete Frame Infilled With Precast Modular Reinforced Blocks Using Pseudo-Dynamic Testing and Nonlinear Dynamic Finite Element Analysis","authors":"Ju-Seong Jung,&nbsp;Kang-Seok Lee","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study proposes a novel seismic retrofitting method involving a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame infilled with precast modular reinforced blocks (PMRBs) to address the limitations of conventional infilling techniques. The retrofitting system for the R/C frame infilled with PMRB maximizes the advantages of factory-produced modular reinforcement blocks, considerably improving the constructability and joint integrity between the existing frame and the reinforcement, without substantially increasing the structural weight. Moreover, this approach uses a typical frame-infilling method to enhance lateral load capacity, simplifying the calculation of the required amount of seismic reinforcement; thus, it is ideal for R/C buildings with non-seismic detailing dominated by shear failure because it helps secure the necessary strength. A pseudo-dynamic test was conducted using a full-scale two-story frame test specimen, based on an existing R/C building with non-seismic detailing, to verify the restoring force characteristics, strength-increasing effects, reinforcement strain and seismic response control capabilities of the PMRB frame-infilling system. Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to compare and estimate the results of the pseudo-dynamic test. The study results showed that the average deviation ratio for the seismic response load and displacement between the nonlinear dynamic FEA and the pseudo-dynamic test was approximately 10%, indicating similar outcomes. Under a design basis earthquake of 200 cm/s<sup>2</sup> in seismic intensity, the unreinforced R/C frame experienced shear failure, whereas the PMRB-reinforced frame sustained only minor earthquake damage, even under seismic accelerations of a maximum considered earthquake of 300 cm/s<sup>2</sup> and a large-scale earthquake of 400 cm/s<sup>2</sup>. Thus, the newly developed PMRB frame-infilling system shows great promise for seismic reinforcement.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 2","pages":"724-746"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a novel seismic retrofitting method involving a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame infilled with precast modular reinforced blocks (PMRBs) to address the limitations of conventional infilling techniques. The retrofitting system for the R/C frame infilled with PMRB maximizes the advantages of factory-produced modular reinforcement blocks, considerably improving the constructability and joint integrity between the existing frame and the reinforcement, without substantially increasing the structural weight. Moreover, this approach uses a typical frame-infilling method to enhance lateral load capacity, simplifying the calculation of the required amount of seismic reinforcement; thus, it is ideal for R/C buildings with non-seismic detailing dominated by shear failure because it helps secure the necessary strength. A pseudo-dynamic test was conducted using a full-scale two-story frame test specimen, based on an existing R/C building with non-seismic detailing, to verify the restoring force characteristics, strength-increasing effects, reinforcement strain and seismic response control capabilities of the PMRB frame-infilling system. Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to compare and estimate the results of the pseudo-dynamic test. The study results showed that the average deviation ratio for the seismic response load and displacement between the nonlinear dynamic FEA and the pseudo-dynamic test was approximately 10%, indicating similar outcomes. Under a design basis earthquake of 200 cm/s2 in seismic intensity, the unreinforced R/C frame experienced shear failure, whereas the PMRB-reinforced frame sustained only minor earthquake damage, even under seismic accelerations of a maximum considered earthquake of 300 cm/s2 and a large-scale earthquake of 400 cm/s2. Thus, the newly developed PMRB frame-infilling system shows great promise for seismic reinforcement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于拟动力试验和非线性动力有限元分析的预制模块化钢筋混凝土框架抗震安全性评价
本研究提出了一种新的抗震加固方法,涉及钢筋混凝土(R/C)框架填充预制模块增强块(PMRBs),以解决传统填充技术的局限性。填充PMRB的R/C框架改造系统最大限度地发挥了工厂生产的模块化钢筋块的优势,大大提高了现有框架和钢筋之间的可施工性和接缝完整性,而不会大幅增加结构重量。此外,该方法采用典型的框架填充法来提高侧载能力,简化了所需抗震配筋量的计算;因此,对于以剪切破坏为主的非抗震细节的R/C建筑来说,它是理想的,因为它有助于确保必要的强度。以某既有R/C建筑为基础,采用全尺寸两层框架试件进行拟动力试验,验证PMRB框架-填充体系的恢复力特性、增强效应、钢筋应变和地震反应控制能力。采用非线性动力有限元分析(FEA)对拟动力试验结果进行比较和估计。研究结果表明,非线性动力有限元分析与拟动力试验的地震反应荷载和位移的平均偏差比约为10%,表明结果相似。在200 cm/s2的设计基础地震烈度下,未加筋的R/C框架发生了剪切破坏,而pmrb加筋框架即使在300 cm/s2的最大地震加速度和400 cm/s2的大地震加速度下也只发生了轻微的地震破坏。因此,新开发的PMRB框架填充体系在抗震加固方面具有很大的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information Bayesian Identification of Soil-Structure Systems Using Seismic Response Measurements: A Case Study on a Field Test Structure Combined Vertical and Horizontal Components of Near-Source Earthquakes and Impact on Base-Isolated Structures Structural Health Monitoring of a Unidirectional Isolation Bridge: Bidirectional Seismic Behavior, Stochastic Model Updating, and Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1