Correction to “Enhancing Peer Review Efficiency: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Reviewer Selection Across Academic Disciplines”

IF 2.4 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1002/leap.1663

{"title":"Correction to “Enhancing Peer Review Efficiency: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Reviewer Selection Across Academic Disciplines”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/leap.1663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Farber, S. 2024. “ Enhancing Peer Review Efficiency: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Reviewer Selection Across Academic Disciplines.” Learned Publishing 37: e1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1638.\n In the section “Ethical considerations in AI-assisted peer review,” an incorrect reference was included in the following sentence:“The ‘black box’ nature of some machine learning algorithms can make it difficult to understand how reviewer recommendations are generated, potentially undermining trust in the peer-review process (Horbach & Halffman, 2020).” This should have read “The ‘black box’ nature of some machine learning algorithms can make it difficult to understand how reviewer recommendations are generated, potentially undermining trust in the peer-review process (Pillai, 2024).”Correct reference: Pillai, V. 2024. “Enhancing Transparency and Understanding in AI Decision-Making Processes.” Iconic Research and Engineering Journals 8, no. 1: 168–172.We apologise for this error.","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1663","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farber, S. 2024. “ Enhancing Peer Review Efficiency: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Reviewer Selection Across Academic Disciplines.” Learned Publishing 37: e1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1638.

In the section “Ethical considerations in AI-assisted peer review,” an incorrect reference was included in the following sentence:

“The ‘black box’ nature of some machine learning algorithms can make it difficult to understand how reviewer recommendations are generated, potentially undermining trust in the peer-review process (Horbach & Halffman, 2020).” This should have read “The ‘black box’ nature of some machine learning algorithms can make it difficult to understand how reviewer recommendations are generated, potentially undermining trust in the peer-review process (Pillai, 2024).”

Correct reference: Pillai, V. 2024. “Enhancing Transparency and Understanding in AI Decision-Making Processes.” Iconic Research and Engineering Journals 8, no. 1: 168–172.

We apologise for this error.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

对“提高同行评审效率：跨学科人工智能辅助审稿人选择的混合方法分析”的更正

法伯，s。提高同行评审效率：跨学科人工智能辅助审稿人选择的混合方法分析。学术出版37:e1638。https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1638。在“人工智能辅助同行评议中的伦理考虑”一节中，以下句子中包含了一个错误的引用：“一些机器学习算法的‘黑箱’性质可能使人们难以理解评议者的建议是如何产生的，这可能会破坏同行评议过程中的信任(Horbach &；Halffman, 2020)。”这句话应该是“一些机器学习算法的‘黑箱’性质使得人们很难理解审稿人的建议是如何产生的，这可能会破坏同行评审过程中的信任（Pillai, 2024）。”正确的参考文献：皮莱，V. 2024。“提高人工智能决策过程的透明度和理解。”标志性研究与工程学报，第8期。1: 168 - 172。我们为这个错误道歉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

17.90%

发文量