Correction to “Enhancing Peer Review Efficiency: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Reviewer Selection Across Academic Disciplines”

IF 2.2 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1002/leap.1663

{"title":"Correction to “Enhancing Peer Review Efficiency: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Reviewer Selection Across Academic Disciplines”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/leap.1663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Farber, S. 2024. “ Enhancing Peer Review Efficiency: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Reviewer Selection Across Academic Disciplines.” Learned Publishing 37: e1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1638.\n In the section “Ethical considerations in AI-assisted peer review,” an incorrect reference was included in the following sentence:“The ‘black box’ nature of some machine learning algorithms can make it difficult to understand how reviewer recommendations are generated, potentially undermining trust in the peer-review process (Horbach & Halffman, 2020).” This should have read “The ‘black box’ nature of some machine learning algorithms can make it difficult to understand how reviewer recommendations are generated, potentially undermining trust in the peer-review process (Pillai, 2024).”Correct reference: Pillai, V. 2024. “Enhancing Transparency and Understanding in AI Decision-Making Processes.” Iconic Research and Engineering Journals 8, no. 1: 168–172.We apologise for this error.","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1663","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farber, S. 2024. “ Enhancing Peer Review Efficiency: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Reviewer Selection Across Academic Disciplines.” Learned Publishing 37: e1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1638.

In the section “Ethical considerations in AI-assisted peer review,” an incorrect reference was included in the following sentence:

“The ‘black box’ nature of some machine learning algorithms can make it difficult to understand how reviewer recommendations are generated, potentially undermining trust in the peer-review process (Horbach & Halffman, 2020).” This should have read “The ‘black box’ nature of some machine learning algorithms can make it difficult to understand how reviewer recommendations are generated, potentially undermining trust in the peer-review process (Pillai, 2024).”

Correct reference: Pillai, V. 2024. “Enhancing Transparency and Understanding in AI Decision-Making Processes.” Iconic Research and Engineering Journals 8, no. 1: 168–172.

We apologise for this error.

查看原文