Medication Literacy and Medication Self-Management: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hospitalised Patients (65+) With Polypharmacy

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1155/jonm/5430265
Laura Mortelmans, Jenny Gentizon, Tinne Dilles
{"title":"Medication Literacy and Medication Self-Management: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hospitalised Patients (65+) With Polypharmacy","authors":"Laura Mortelmans,&nbsp;Jenny Gentizon,&nbsp;Tinne Dilles","doi":"10.1155/jonm/5430265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This study aimed to examine the relationship between medication literacy and the degree to which patients are considered capable of medication self-management, the factors influencing the strength of this relationship and the factors influencing a patient’s capability for medication self-management. Between January and April 2022, a cross-sectional survey was conducted on hospitalised patients (65+) with polypharmacy. Medication literacy was evaluated using the MEDication Literacy Assessment of Geriatric patients and informal caregivers (MED-fLAG). The SelfMED assessment determined a patient’s capability for medication self-management. The relationship between MED-fLAG and SelfMED was explored with Pearson’s <i>r</i>. Moderation analysis was used to explore the factors influencing the strength of the relationship between both. Linear regression explored the factors influencing SelfMED scores. In total, 169 patients participated in the study. Patients considered themselves more capable of in-hospital medication self-management (8/10 rating) compared to nurses’ and physicians’ opinions (6/10 rating). Interactive medication literacy scored higher (mean = 3.0) than functional (mean = 2.9) and critical medication literacy (mean = 2.8). The more medication literacy skills, the more patients were considered able for medication self-management by healthcare providers (<i>r</i> = 0.630, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Moderation analysis could not reveal any factors that significantly affected the strength of the relationship between both. Age, managing medication independently at home, the number of chronic conditions and medication literacy were significant predictors of a patient’s capability for in-hospital medication self-management. This study demonstrated a rather strong correlation between the results of the MED-fLAG and the SelfMED assessment. Hence, SelfMED can be used as a stand-alone first screening instrument to determine a patient’s capability for in-hospital medication self-management, without first assessing medication literacy. MED-fLAG can provide valuable insights into the medication literacy of patients considered less capable of managing their medication, allowing medication information and interventions to be tailored to the patient.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/5430265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/5430265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between medication literacy and the degree to which patients are considered capable of medication self-management, the factors influencing the strength of this relationship and the factors influencing a patient’s capability for medication self-management. Between January and April 2022, a cross-sectional survey was conducted on hospitalised patients (65+) with polypharmacy. Medication literacy was evaluated using the MEDication Literacy Assessment of Geriatric patients and informal caregivers (MED-fLAG). The SelfMED assessment determined a patient’s capability for medication self-management. The relationship between MED-fLAG and SelfMED was explored with Pearson’s r. Moderation analysis was used to explore the factors influencing the strength of the relationship between both. Linear regression explored the factors influencing SelfMED scores. In total, 169 patients participated in the study. Patients considered themselves more capable of in-hospital medication self-management (8/10 rating) compared to nurses’ and physicians’ opinions (6/10 rating). Interactive medication literacy scored higher (mean = 3.0) than functional (mean = 2.9) and critical medication literacy (mean = 2.8). The more medication literacy skills, the more patients were considered able for medication self-management by healthcare providers (r = 0.630, p < 0.001). Moderation analysis could not reveal any factors that significantly affected the strength of the relationship between both. Age, managing medication independently at home, the number of chronic conditions and medication literacy were significant predictors of a patient’s capability for in-hospital medication self-management. This study demonstrated a rather strong correlation between the results of the MED-fLAG and the SelfMED assessment. Hence, SelfMED can be used as a stand-alone first screening instrument to determine a patient’s capability for in-hospital medication self-management, without first assessing medication literacy. MED-fLAG can provide valuable insights into the medication literacy of patients considered less capable of managing their medication, allowing medication information and interventions to be tailored to the patient.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Staffing, Nurses’ Emotional Exhaustion, and Adverse Patient Events in Critical Care Units in Sultanate of Oman Profiles and Influencing Factors of Work–Family Balance Among Nurses in China: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Latent Profile Analysis Exploring Compassionate Care Patterns Among Nurses and Its Associations With Resilience: Multilevel Contextual Effects Modeling Mindful Self-Care and Compassion Fatigue in Nurses: The Chain Mediating Roles of Resilience and Professional Identity Concept, Influencing Factors, and Interventions of Nursing Health Leadership: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1