Incidence and predictors of nonresponse to intranasal midazolam in children undergoing laceration repair.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1111/acem.15106
Sarah R Martin, Kelly Bauer, Theodore W Heyming, Jenny Zhu, Helen Lee, Zeev N Kain
{"title":"Incidence and predictors of nonresponse to intranasal midazolam in children undergoing laceration repair.","authors":"Sarah R Martin, Kelly Bauer, Theodore W Heyming, Jenny Zhu, Helen Lee, Zeev N Kain","doi":"10.1111/acem.15106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Pediatric laceration repairs are common in the emergency department (ED) and often associated with significant procedural anxiety. Despite the increased use of intranasal midazolam (INM) prior to pediatric ED procedures, there is limited, real-world data on the effects of INM on anxiety. This study aimed to describe the proportion of children who were nonresponsive to INM (i.e., exhibited extreme anxiety) and identify factors associated with INM nonresponse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included a sample of 102 children (ages 2-10 years) who received 0.2 mg/kg INM prior to laceration repair in the ED. Procedural anxiety was assessed using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS). Children exhibiting extreme procedural anxiety (mYPAS score ≥72.91) when procedure started were labeled as INM nonresponders. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses explored associations between child age, temperament, laceration location, time from INM administration, and likelihood of INM nonresponse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample, 45.1% of the children were classified as INM nonresponders, exhibiting extreme procedural anxiety. Bivariate analyses indicated that nonresponders were younger, had lower sociability temperament, longer delay between INM administration and the procedure, and were more likely to have extremity lacerations. In the logistic regression, younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, p = 0.034), lower sociability temperament (OR 0.28, p = 0.002), and extremity lacerations (OR 8.04, p = 0.009) were significantly associated with likelihood of INM nonresponse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nearly half of the children in our sample exhibited extreme procedural anxiety despite receiving INM. The high incidence of nonresponse to INM has important clinical practice implications and suggests that 0.2 mg/kg INM alone may not be sufficient to manage all pediatric procedural anxiety in the ED. Findings highlight a need for further research examining multimodal strategies to manage procedural anxiety in the pediatric ED, particularly for younger children with low sociability temperament or extremity lacerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"768-775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: Pediatric laceration repairs are common in the emergency department (ED) and often associated with significant procedural anxiety. Despite the increased use of intranasal midazolam (INM) prior to pediatric ED procedures, there is limited, real-world data on the effects of INM on anxiety. This study aimed to describe the proportion of children who were nonresponsive to INM (i.e., exhibited extreme anxiety) and identify factors associated with INM nonresponse.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included a sample of 102 children (ages 2-10 years) who received 0.2 mg/kg INM prior to laceration repair in the ED. Procedural anxiety was assessed using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS). Children exhibiting extreme procedural anxiety (mYPAS score ≥72.91) when procedure started were labeled as INM nonresponders. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses explored associations between child age, temperament, laceration location, time from INM administration, and likelihood of INM nonresponse.

Results: In this sample, 45.1% of the children were classified as INM nonresponders, exhibiting extreme procedural anxiety. Bivariate analyses indicated that nonresponders were younger, had lower sociability temperament, longer delay between INM administration and the procedure, and were more likely to have extremity lacerations. In the logistic regression, younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, p = 0.034), lower sociability temperament (OR 0.28, p = 0.002), and extremity lacerations (OR 8.04, p = 0.009) were significantly associated with likelihood of INM nonresponse.

Conclusions: Nearly half of the children in our sample exhibited extreme procedural anxiety despite receiving INM. The high incidence of nonresponse to INM has important clinical practice implications and suggests that 0.2 mg/kg INM alone may not be sufficient to manage all pediatric procedural anxiety in the ED. Findings highlight a need for further research examining multimodal strategies to manage procedural anxiety in the pediatric ED, particularly for younger children with low sociability temperament or extremity lacerations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻内咪达唑仑治疗儿童裂伤修复无反应的发生率和预测因素。
背景/目的:儿科撕裂伤修复在急诊科(ED)很常见,通常伴有明显的手术焦虑。尽管在儿科急诊科手术前鼻内咪达唑仑(INM)的使用越来越多,但关于INM对焦虑的影响的真实数据有限。本研究旨在描述对INM无反应(即表现出极度焦虑)的儿童比例,并确定与INM无反应相关的因素。方法:这项横断面研究包括102名儿童(2-10岁),他们在ED撕裂伤修复前接受0.2 mg/kg INM治疗。使用改良的耶鲁术前焦虑量表(mYPAS)评估程序性焦虑。手术开始时表现出极度程序焦虑(mYPAS评分≥72.91)的儿童被标记为INM无反应。双变量和多变量logistic回归分析探讨了儿童年龄、气质、撕裂位置、注射INM的时间和INM无反应的可能性之间的关系。结果:在这个样本中,45.1%的儿童被归类为INM无反应,表现出极度的程序焦虑。双变量分析表明,无应答者更年轻,社交气质较低,INM给药和手术之间的延迟时间较长,并且更有可能发生肢体撕裂。在logistic回归中,较年轻的年龄(比值比[OR] 0.79, p = 0.034)、较低的社交气质(比值比[OR] 0.28, p = 0.002)和四肢撕裂伤(比值比[OR] 8.04, p = 0.009)与INM无反应的可能性显著相关。结论:尽管接受了INM治疗,我们样本中近一半的儿童表现出极度的程序性焦虑。INM无反应的高发生率具有重要的临床实践意义,表明仅0.2 mg/kg的INM可能不足以控制所有儿科急诊科的程序性焦虑。研究结果强调需要进一步研究多模式策略来控制儿科急诊科的程序性焦虑,特别是对于低社交气质或四肢撕裂的年幼儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis Treatment Protocol With Increased Dextrose Supplementation to Prevent Hypoglycemia. Prospective Validation of A Novel Scale for Triage Assessment of Frailty in the Emergency Department (ED-FraS). Reflect, Recalibrate, Repeat. An Underrecognized Problem: Missed and Delayed Carbidopa-Levodopa Administration in Emergency Department Patients With Parkinson's Disease. Single-Shot Regional Anesthesia for Early Rib Fracture-Associated Pain Management: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1