Rapid Verbal Persuasion to increase influenza vaccine uptake: protocol for a randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness -implementation trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-12032-6
Siyuan Liu, Lan Gao, Yingying Jin, Jiangyun Chen, Dadong Wu, Yiyuan Cai, Tao Wang, Sanhao Huang, Ciling Yan, Run Wang, Dong Roman Xu
{"title":"Rapid Verbal Persuasion to increase influenza vaccine uptake: protocol for a randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness -implementation trial.","authors":"Siyuan Liu, Lan Gao, Yingying Jin, Jiangyun Chen, Dadong Wu, Yiyuan Cai, Tao Wang, Sanhao Huang, Ciling Yan, Run Wang, Dong Roman Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-12032-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While influenza vaccines are the most effective measure for preventing influenza, uptake rates in China remain relatively low. Rapid Verbal Persuasion (RVP), with highly rapid fashion, has a strong evidence base in promoting behavior change. Despite this, it is underused or rarely evaluated in the context of vaccination. Additionally, the success of RVP implementation in vaccination clinics hinges on the motivation of vaccination staff, which remains critical even with stable contextual factors. Multifaceted incentive-based implementation strategies, which aim to enhance motivation to promote the implementation of evidence-based practices, could be advantageous. This study protocol outlines an implementation-effectiveness hybrid type 2 design to evaluate the effectiveness of both the incentive-based implementation strategies on implementation outcomes and RVP on increasing influenza vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study will be conducted as a two-tiered cluster of randomized controlled trials over three months. Initially, 32 vaccination clinics will be randomly allocated to one of two study arms: (a) implementation of RVP or (b) no implementation. At the end of the study period, differences in influenza vaccination status between the intervention and control groups will be compared (primary outcome). Subsequently, a cluster randomized factorial trial will be conducted, involving 16 clinics implementing RVP. This trial will aim to compare the impact of various implementation strategies (different combinations of incentives) on fidelity in RVP implementation (primary outcome). Data collection for the primary outcomes will include unannounced exit interviews. Modified Poisson regression models and generalized linear mixed-effects models will be utilized to analyze the association between primary outcomes and interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study aims to enhance the influenza vaccination rate in China by developing financial and non-financial incentives that allow vaccination staff to deliver RVP with greater motivation. Furthermore, the evidence generated from this multi-center trial will assist policymakers in improving current incentive systems within immunization services.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Trial identifier: ChiCTR2400091302 (Registration Date: October 25, 2024); ChiCTR2400091324 (Registration Date: October 25, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12032-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While influenza vaccines are the most effective measure for preventing influenza, uptake rates in China remain relatively low. Rapid Verbal Persuasion (RVP), with highly rapid fashion, has a strong evidence base in promoting behavior change. Despite this, it is underused or rarely evaluated in the context of vaccination. Additionally, the success of RVP implementation in vaccination clinics hinges on the motivation of vaccination staff, which remains critical even with stable contextual factors. Multifaceted incentive-based implementation strategies, which aim to enhance motivation to promote the implementation of evidence-based practices, could be advantageous. This study protocol outlines an implementation-effectiveness hybrid type 2 design to evaluate the effectiveness of both the incentive-based implementation strategies on implementation outcomes and RVP on increasing influenza vaccination rates.

Method: This study will be conducted as a two-tiered cluster of randomized controlled trials over three months. Initially, 32 vaccination clinics will be randomly allocated to one of two study arms: (a) implementation of RVP or (b) no implementation. At the end of the study period, differences in influenza vaccination status between the intervention and control groups will be compared (primary outcome). Subsequently, a cluster randomized factorial trial will be conducted, involving 16 clinics implementing RVP. This trial will aim to compare the impact of various implementation strategies (different combinations of incentives) on fidelity in RVP implementation (primary outcome). Data collection for the primary outcomes will include unannounced exit interviews. Modified Poisson regression models and generalized linear mixed-effects models will be utilized to analyze the association between primary outcomes and interventions.

Conclusion: The study aims to enhance the influenza vaccination rate in China by developing financial and non-financial incentives that allow vaccination staff to deliver RVP with greater motivation. Furthermore, the evidence generated from this multi-center trial will assist policymakers in improving current incentive systems within immunization services.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Trial identifier: ChiCTR2400091302 (Registration Date: October 25, 2024); ChiCTR2400091324 (Registration Date: October 25, 2024).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速口头说服增加流感疫苗吸收率:随机混合2型有效性实施试验方案
背景:虽然流感疫苗是预防流感最有效的措施,但在中国的接种率仍然相对较低。快速言语说服(RVP)具有高度的时效性,在促进行为改变方面有强有力的证据基础。尽管如此,它在疫苗接种的背景下未得到充分利用或很少评估。此外,疫苗接种诊所实施RVP的成功取决于疫苗接种人员的动机,即使在稳定的背景因素下,这一点仍然至关重要。以激励为基础的多方面实施战略可能是有利的,其目的是增强动机,促进循证实践的实施。本研究方案概述了一种实施-有效性混合2型设计,以评估基于激励的实施策略对实施结果的有效性,以及RVP对提高流感疫苗接种率的有效性。方法:本研究将采用两级随机对照试验,为期三个月。最初,32个疫苗接种诊所将被随机分配到两个研究组之一:(a)实施RVP或(b)不实施RVP。在研究期结束时,将比较干预组和对照组之间流感疫苗接种状况的差异(主要结果)。随后,将进行一项聚类随机因子试验,涉及16家实施RVP的诊所。本试验旨在比较不同的实施策略(不同的激励组合)对RVP实施(主要结果)的保真度的影响。主要结果的数据收集将包括不事先通知的离职面谈。修正泊松回归模型和广义线性混合效应模型将用于分析主要结局与干预措施之间的关系。结论:本研究旨在通过制定财政和非财政激励措施,使疫苗接种人员更有动力地提供RVP,从而提高中国的流感疫苗接种率。此外,这项多中心试验产生的证据将有助于政策制定者改善免疫服务中目前的激励制度。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心。试验标识符:ChiCTR2400091302(注册日期:2024年10月25日);ChiCTR2400091324(注册日期:2024年10月25日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
A cross-sectional survey of service delivery for infertility in Uganda: gaps, opportunities and a way forward. Factors contributing to 25-year-long retention of South Australian general practitioners in rural practice: a cross-sectional survey. Evaluating the effect of an audiovisual intervention on routine immunization knowledge among urban frontline healthcare workers in Eastern India. The effect of community-based health insurance on out-of-pocket expenditure among diabetic patients at hawassa university comprehensive specialized hospital: facility-based comparative cross-sectional study. Analyzing governance of a sub-national health insurance scheme for providing universal health care and better social health protection performance through the lenses of the principal-agent theory in Anambra state.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1