Clinical efficacy and safety of P-15 peptide enhanced bone graft substitute in surgical bone regenerative procedures in adult maxillofacial, spine, and trauma patients : a systematic literature review.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Bone & Joint Research Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.142.BJR-2024-0033.R2
Barend J Spanninga, Thomáy-Claire A Hoelen, Scott Johnson, Boyle Cheng, Taco J Blokhuis, Paul C Willems, Jacobus J C Arts
{"title":"Clinical efficacy and safety of P-15 peptide enhanced bone graft substitute in surgical bone regenerative procedures in adult maxillofacial, spine, and trauma patients : a systematic literature review.","authors":"Barend J Spanninga, Thomáy-Claire A Hoelen, Scott Johnson, Boyle Cheng, Taco J Blokhuis, Paul C Willems, Jacobus J C Arts","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.142.BJR-2024-0033.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Autologous bone graft (ABG) is considered the 'gold standard' among graft materials for bone regeneration. However, complications including limited availability, donor site morbidity, and deterioration of regenerative capacity over time have been reported. P-15 is a synthetic peptide that mimics the cell binding domain of Type-I collagen. This peptide stimulates new bone formation by enhancing osteogenic cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of P-15 peptide in bone regeneration throughout the skeletal system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles on 13 May 2023. The systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed the identified articles. Quality assessment was conducted using the methodological index for non-randomized studies and the risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening, 28 articles were included and grouped by surgical indication, e.g. maxillofacial procedures (n = 18), spine (n = 9), and trauma (n = 1). Published results showed that P-15 peptide was effective in spinal fusion (n = 7) and maxillofacial (n = 11), with very few clinically relevant adverse events related to P-15 peptide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic literature review concluded that moderate- (risk of bias, some concern: 50%) to high-quality (risk of bias, low: 46%) clinical evidence exists showing equivalent safety and efficacy in bone regeneration using a P-15 peptide enhanced bone graft substitute compared to ABG. P-15 peptide is safe and effective, resulting in rapid bone formation with a low probability of minor complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"77-92"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.142.BJR-2024-0033.R2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Autologous bone graft (ABG) is considered the 'gold standard' among graft materials for bone regeneration. However, complications including limited availability, donor site morbidity, and deterioration of regenerative capacity over time have been reported. P-15 is a synthetic peptide that mimics the cell binding domain of Type-I collagen. This peptide stimulates new bone formation by enhancing osteogenic cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of P-15 peptide in bone regeneration throughout the skeletal system.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles on 13 May 2023. The systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed the identified articles. Quality assessment was conducted using the methodological index for non-randomized studies and the risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials.

Results: After screening, 28 articles were included and grouped by surgical indication, e.g. maxillofacial procedures (n = 18), spine (n = 9), and trauma (n = 1). Published results showed that P-15 peptide was effective in spinal fusion (n = 7) and maxillofacial (n = 11), with very few clinically relevant adverse events related to P-15 peptide.

Conclusion: This systematic literature review concluded that moderate- (risk of bias, some concern: 50%) to high-quality (risk of bias, low: 46%) clinical evidence exists showing equivalent safety and efficacy in bone regeneration using a P-15 peptide enhanced bone graft substitute compared to ABG. P-15 peptide is safe and effective, resulting in rapid bone formation with a low probability of minor complications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P-15肽增强骨移植替代物在成人颌面、脊柱和创伤患者骨再生手术中的临床疗效和安全性:系统的文献综述。
目的:自体骨移植(ABG)被认为是骨再生移植材料中的“金标准”。然而,并发症,包括有限的可用性,供体部位的发病率,以及随着时间的推移再生能力的恶化已被报道。P-15是一种合成肽,模仿i型胶原的细胞结合域。这种肽通过增强成骨细胞的附着、增殖和分化来刺激新骨的形成。本研究的目的是进行系统的文献综述,以确定P-15肽在整个骨骼系统骨再生中的临床疗效和安全性。方法:检索2023年5月13日PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library的相关文章。系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行报告。两名审稿人独立筛选和评估已确定的文章。采用非随机研究的方法学指标和随机对照试验的偏倚风险评估工具进行质量评价。结果:筛选后,纳入28篇文章,并按手术指征进行分组,如颌面手术(n = 18)、脊柱(n = 9)和创伤(n = 1)。已发表的结果显示,P-15肽在脊柱融合(n = 7)和颌面融合(n = 11)中有效,与P-15肽相关的临床相关不良事件很少。结论:本系统文献综述的结论是,存在中等(偏倚风险:50%)到高质量(偏倚风险:46%)的临床证据,表明与ABG相比,P-15肽增强骨移植替代物在骨再生方面具有同等的安全性和有效性。P-15肽安全有效,可快速成骨,并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum. Effective therapy for periprosthetic joint infection through sequential application of non-contact low-frequency ultrasonic debridement and antiseptic solutions. Accurate quantification of the bacterial inoculum and tissue load in a preclinical model of implant-related infection. The impact of pedicle screw transitional segment and thread distribution on postoperative rod-screw system failure : insights from clinical research and mechanical testing. Patellar luxation causes abnormal mechanical loading and joint destruction in the femoral-tibial joint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1