Ambient air pollution and birth outcomes: a scoping review to investigate the mediating and moderating variables-protocol.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088477
Lucy Perry, Amy Mizen, Kate Ellis-Davies, Richard Fry, Amy Isham
{"title":"Ambient air pollution and birth outcomes: a scoping review to investigate the mediating and moderating variables-protocol.","authors":"Lucy Perry, Amy Mizen, Kate Ellis-Davies, Richard Fry, Amy Isham","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnant women and their babies are a highly vulnerable population to health effects from air pollution. This scoping review aims to understand the extent and type of evidence concerning the mediating and moderating factors between air pollution and birth outcomes. By gathering and synthesising this evidence, this review aims to identify key concepts, themes and knowledge gaps. In turn, these findings will serve as a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers by highlighting potential pathways and gaps in evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This scoping review protocol is based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported in full with a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) flow diagram. This review will search eight databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, GreenFILE, CINAHL Ultimate, APA PsycINFO and MIDIRS. Results will be limited to those written or translated into English and peer-reviewed studies with no restriction on publication date. The study selection and data extraction will be completed within the software Covidence by two or more independent reviewers, with conflicts solved by group discussion. The data extracted from this process will include publication details, study characteristics and population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study will not collect primary data; therefore, no formal ethical approval is required. The findings will be disseminated to academic and non-academic audiences through conferences, publications and focus groups.</p><p><strong>Trail registration number: </strong>Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6Y2D9).</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 2","pages":"e088477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnant women and their babies are a highly vulnerable population to health effects from air pollution. This scoping review aims to understand the extent and type of evidence concerning the mediating and moderating factors between air pollution and birth outcomes. By gathering and synthesising this evidence, this review aims to identify key concepts, themes and knowledge gaps. In turn, these findings will serve as a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers by highlighting potential pathways and gaps in evidence.

Methods and analysis: This scoping review protocol is based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported in full with a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) flow diagram. This review will search eight databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, GreenFILE, CINAHL Ultimate, APA PsycINFO and MIDIRS. Results will be limited to those written or translated into English and peer-reviewed studies with no restriction on publication date. The study selection and data extraction will be completed within the software Covidence by two or more independent reviewers, with conflicts solved by group discussion. The data extracted from this process will include publication details, study characteristics and population characteristics.

Ethics and dissemination: This study will not collect primary data; therefore, no formal ethical approval is required. The findings will be disseminated to academic and non-academic audiences through conferences, publications and focus groups.

Trail registration number: Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6Y2D9).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境空气污染与出生结果:调查中介变量和调节变量的范围研究--协议。
孕妇及其婴儿是极易受到空气污染健康影响的人群。本综述旨在了解空气污染与出生结果之间的中介和调节因素的证据的程度和类型。通过收集和综合这些证据,本综述旨在确定关键概念、主题和知识差距。反过来,这些发现将通过突出证据中的潜在途径和差距,为研究人员和政策制定者提供宝贵的资源。方法和分析:本范围审查方案基于乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的范围审查方法,并将与范围审查的系统审查和荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)流程图一起完整报告。本文将检索Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed、Embase、GreenFILE、CINAHL Ultimate、APA PsycINFO和MIDIRS等8个数据库。结果将限于那些书面或翻译成英文和同行评审的研究,不受出版日期的限制。研究选择和数据提取将由两名或多名独立审稿人在covid - ence软件中完成,冲突通过小组讨论解决。从这一过程中提取的数据将包括出版物细节、研究特征和人口特征。伦理与传播:本研究不收集原始数据;因此,不需要正式的伦理批准。研究结果将通过会议、出版物和焦点小组向学术和非学术听众传播。试验注册号:Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6Y2D9)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Adapting and implementing the Serious Illness Care Programme for outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study. Assessment of paediatric vertebral body and canal dimension in the cervical spine considering the influence of ethnicity in a New Zealand cohort. Comparison of the effects of eHealth-delivered sedentary breaks versus physical activity promotion interventions on sedentary time: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study in the Netherlands. Heart rate variability as a biomarker for autonomic recovery and maternal wellbeing following caesarean delivery: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1