Diagnosis, screening, and follow-up of patients with familial interstitial lung disease: Results from an international survey.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1186/s12890-025-03532-0
Emil Vilstrup Moen, Thomas Skovhus Prior, Michael Kreuter, Wim A Wuyts, Maria Molina-Molina, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Antonió Morais, Argyrios Tzouvelekis, Christopher J Ryerson, Fabian Caro, Ivette Buendia-Roldan, Jesper M Magnusson, Joyce S Lee, Julie Morisett, Justin M Oldham, Lauren K Troy, Manuela Funke-Chambour, Maria Laura Alberti, Raphael Borie, Simon L F Walsh, Sujeet Rajan, Yasuhiro Kondoh, Yet H Khor, Elisabeth Bendstrup
{"title":"Diagnosis, screening, and follow-up of patients with familial interstitial lung disease: Results from an international survey.","authors":"Emil Vilstrup Moen, Thomas Skovhus Prior, Michael Kreuter, Wim A Wuyts, Maria Molina-Molina, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Antonió Morais, Argyrios Tzouvelekis, Christopher J Ryerson, Fabian Caro, Ivette Buendia-Roldan, Jesper M Magnusson, Joyce S Lee, Julie Morisett, Justin M Oldham, Lauren K Troy, Manuela Funke-Chambour, Maria Laura Alberti, Raphael Borie, Simon L F Walsh, Sujeet Rajan, Yasuhiro Kondoh, Yet H Khor, Elisabeth Bendstrup","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03532-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in the field of genetics of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) have led to the recent consensus statements made by expert groups. International standards for genetic testing in ILD have not yet been established. We aimed to examine current real-world strategies employed by pulmonologists working with familial ILD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of pulmonologists with expertise in ILD developed an international survey aimed at clinicians working with ILD. The survey consisted of 74 questions divided into eight topics: characteristics of respondents, diagnosis, screening of first-degree relatives, screening tools, genetic testing methods, lung transplantation, ethical concerns, and future needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 237 pulmonologists from 50 countries participated. A family history of ILD was asked for by 91% of respondents while fewer asked for symptoms related to telomere disorders. Respondents stated that 59% had access to genetic testing, and 30% to a genetic multidisciplinary team (MDT). Many respondents were unaware of specific genetic testing methods. Pathogenic genetic variants were seen as a potential contraindication for lung transplantation in 6-8% of respondents. Genetic screening of relatives was supported by 80% of respondents who indicated insufficient evidence and a lack of formal guidelines for genetics and ILD. Only 16% had a standardized program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most pulmonologists ask for a family history of ILD and recommend genetic testing for ILD and screening in relatives but have limited knowledge of specific tests and access to genetic MDT. Evidence-based guidelines to inform patients, relatives, and physicians are still warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03532-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advances in the field of genetics of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) have led to the recent consensus statements made by expert groups. International standards for genetic testing in ILD have not yet been established. We aimed to examine current real-world strategies employed by pulmonologists working with familial ILD.

Methods: A panel of pulmonologists with expertise in ILD developed an international survey aimed at clinicians working with ILD. The survey consisted of 74 questions divided into eight topics: characteristics of respondents, diagnosis, screening of first-degree relatives, screening tools, genetic testing methods, lung transplantation, ethical concerns, and future needs.

Results: Overall, 237 pulmonologists from 50 countries participated. A family history of ILD was asked for by 91% of respondents while fewer asked for symptoms related to telomere disorders. Respondents stated that 59% had access to genetic testing, and 30% to a genetic multidisciplinary team (MDT). Many respondents were unaware of specific genetic testing methods. Pathogenic genetic variants were seen as a potential contraindication for lung transplantation in 6-8% of respondents. Genetic screening of relatives was supported by 80% of respondents who indicated insufficient evidence and a lack of formal guidelines for genetics and ILD. Only 16% had a standardized program.

Conclusion: Most pulmonologists ask for a family history of ILD and recommend genetic testing for ILD and screening in relatives but have limited knowledge of specific tests and access to genetic MDT. Evidence-based guidelines to inform patients, relatives, and physicians are still warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家族性间质性肺病患者的诊断、筛查和随访:来自一项国际调查的结果
背景:间质性肺疾病(ILDs)遗传学领域的进展导致了最近专家组达成的共识声明。ILD基因检测的国际标准尚未建立。我们的目的是研究目前治疗家族性ILD的肺科医生所采用的现实世界策略。方法:一组具有ILD专业知识的肺病学家针对ILD临床医生开展了一项国际调查。该调查包括74个问题,分为8个主题:受访者的特征、诊断、筛查一级亲属、筛查工具、基因检测方法、肺移植、伦理问题和未来需求。结果:总共有来自50个国家的237名肺科医生参与。91%的应答者被问及ILD的家族史,而较少的应答者被问及与端粒紊乱相关的症状。受访者表示,59%的人可以进行基因检测,30%的人可以参加基因多学科小组(MDT)。许多受访者不知道具体的基因检测方法。在6-8%的应答者中,致病基因变异被视为肺移植的潜在禁忌症。80%的受访者表示,证据不足,缺乏遗传学和ILD的正式指南,支持对亲属进行遗传筛查。只有16%的学生有标准化的课程。结论:大多数肺科医生询问ILD的家族史,并推荐ILD的基因检测和亲属筛查,但对特定测试和基因MDT的了解有限。以证据为基础的指导方针告知患者、家属和医生仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of aclidinium bromide therapy on quality of life and symptoms of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis results of the Greek and Austrian ON-AIR real-world observational studies. Prognostic value of combined RDW, NLR, PLR, and mpv detection in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single-center retrospective cohort study. The relevance of sputum galectin-7 levels to clinical and prognostic factors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study from China. Prevalence and associated factors of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study. AI-based chest CT quantification of interstitial lung disease in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: agreement with expert visual assessment in 107 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1