Positive hepatitis B surface antigen leads to a decrease in ovarian reserve in infertile patients receiving first in vitro fertilization treatment.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-03905-6
Yutao Li, Xuejiao Wang, Ye Jiang, Qun Lv, Yi Zhang, Yu Wang
{"title":"Positive hepatitis B surface antigen leads to a decrease in ovarian reserve in infertile patients receiving first in vitro fertilization treatment.","authors":"Yutao Li, Xuejiao Wang, Ye Jiang, Qun Lv, Yi Zhang, Yu Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03905-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the impact of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on ovarian reserve in women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 38,861 infertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment (2016-2022), including 1574 HBsAg-positive cases. A control group of 1574 HBsAg-negative women was matched by age and body mass index (BMI). Comparison of clinical characteristics, antral follicle count (AFC), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH)/FSH ratio, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), gonadotropins (Gn) days, total Gn dosage, number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes, and the proportion of patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR; AMH < 1.1 ng/ml) between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HBsAg-positive women showed lower basal AFC and AMH, higher basal FSH, received more Gn, and had fewer retrieved and MII oocytes than HBsAg-negative women. No significant differences in ovarian reserve or stimulation outcomes were found between e antigen-positive and e antigen-negative HBV-infected groups. DOR was less prevalent in HBsAg-negative women, and logistic regression indicated a higher DOR risk with HBV infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HBsAg positivity significantly impairs ovarian reserve in women, but e antigen status does not notably affect it among HBV-infected individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03905-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the impact of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on ovarian reserve in women.

Methods: We analyzed data from 38,861 infertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment (2016-2022), including 1574 HBsAg-positive cases. A control group of 1574 HBsAg-negative women was matched by age and body mass index (BMI). Comparison of clinical characteristics, antral follicle count (AFC), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH)/FSH ratio, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), gonadotropins (Gn) days, total Gn dosage, number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes, and the proportion of patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR; AMH < 1.1 ng/ml) between two groups.

Results: HBsAg-positive women showed lower basal AFC and AMH, higher basal FSH, received more Gn, and had fewer retrieved and MII oocytes than HBsAg-negative women. No significant differences in ovarian reserve or stimulation outcomes were found between e antigen-positive and e antigen-negative HBV-infected groups. DOR was less prevalent in HBsAg-negative women, and logistic regression indicated a higher DOR risk with HBV infection.

Conclusions: HBsAg positivity significantly impairs ovarian reserve in women, but e antigen status does not notably affect it among HBV-infected individuals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乙型肝炎表面抗原阳性导致接受首次体外受精治疗的不孕症患者卵巢储备减少。
背景:本研究评估慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染对女性卵巢储备的影响。方法:我们分析了38,861名首次接受体外受精(IVF)治疗的不孕妇女(2016-2022年)的数据,其中包括1574例hbsag阳性病例。对照组1574名hbsag阴性妇女,按年龄和体重指数(BMI)匹配。比较临床特征、窦卵泡计数(AFC)、促卵泡激素(FSH)、黄体生成素(LH)/FSH比值、抗勒氏激素(AMH)、促性腺激素(Gn)天数、Gn总剂量、回收卵母细胞数、成熟中期II (MII)卵母细胞数、卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)患者比例;结果:与hbsag阴性妇女相比,hbsag阳性妇女AFC和AMH基础较低,FSH基础较高,接受Gn较多,回收卵母细胞和MII卵母细胞较少。在e抗原阳性和e抗原阴性的hbv感染组中,卵巢储备或刺激结果无显著差异。在hbsag阴性的女性中DOR发病率较低,logistic回归显示HBV感染的DOR风险较高。结论:HBsAg阳性显著损害女性卵巢储备功能,但e抗原状态对hbv感染者卵巢储备功能无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Evolution with age of the relationship between sex and post-COVID symptoms: a population-based cohort study. Reply to: Intraoperative use of sodium oxybate to prevent post-operative delirium in older patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Experiences and service-uptake factors of receiving and providing care for meningitis and its sequelae: a qualitative systematic review. The association of pregnancy complications/risk factors with the development of cancer in women: an umbrella review. Synergistic effects of obesity and type 2 diabetes on adiposity-related cancer risk across age strata.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1