Developing a core outcome set for assessing interventions and care for parents after neonatal death in high-income countries (iCHOOSE Neonatal study): protocol for a mixed-methods study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088251
Anna Davies, Charlotte Williams, Christy Burden, Sadie Mullin, Lucy Moy, Maggie Redshaw, Mehali Patel, Abigail Fraser, Lisa Hinton, Mary Lynch, Abi Merriel, Dimitris Siasakos, James Webbe, David Odd, Laura Timlin, Leanne Watts, Danya Bakhbakhi
{"title":"Developing a core outcome set for assessing interventions and care for parents after neonatal death in high-income countries (iCHOOSE Neonatal study): protocol for a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Anna Davies, Charlotte Williams, Christy Burden, Sadie Mullin, Lucy Moy, Maggie Redshaw, Mehali Patel, Abigail Fraser, Lisa Hinton, Mary Lynch, Abi Merriel, Dimitris Siasakos, James Webbe, David Odd, Laura Timlin, Leanne Watts, Danya Bakhbakhi","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal death exerts long-lasting impact on parents' mental health, finances and relationships, and the wider family. There is national and international momentum to evaluate interventions to support parents after the death of a baby. Core Outcome Sets (COSs) provide a minimum set of outcomes, agreed by stakeholders to be important, which should be evaluated in all studies to support evidence syntheses and identification of the most effective interventions. We aim to develop a COS for assessing interventions and care after neonatal death in high-income countries, to support future evidence syntheses and enable the identification of effective interventions and care for parents.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will develop the COS in six phases. A parent involvement group and stakeholder steering committee have been established and have informed each planned phase: (1) systematic review of quantitative studies evaluating care and interventions provided after neonatal death, to describe interventions, outcomes and outcome measurement tools used to assess intervention effectiveness; (2) qualitative interviews with parents who have experienced neonatal death to identify outcomes important and relevant to them; (3) think-aloud interviews with stakeholders (bereaved parents, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders) to develop and refine an online survey; (4) real-time online international Delphi survey with bereaved parents, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders to shortlist outcomes for consideration in the COS; (5) adapted nominal group online consensus meetings with parents, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders to agree final COS and (6) identification of a preliminary set of measurement tools.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval has been granted for all activities to be undertaken by the University of Bristol Health Sciences Faculty Research Ethics Committee (reference: 15121). We will disseminate the findings via peer-reviewed publications and relevant academic and professional conferences.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42020151365.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 2","pages":"e088251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal death exerts long-lasting impact on parents' mental health, finances and relationships, and the wider family. There is national and international momentum to evaluate interventions to support parents after the death of a baby. Core Outcome Sets (COSs) provide a minimum set of outcomes, agreed by stakeholders to be important, which should be evaluated in all studies to support evidence syntheses and identification of the most effective interventions. We aim to develop a COS for assessing interventions and care after neonatal death in high-income countries, to support future evidence syntheses and enable the identification of effective interventions and care for parents.

Methods and analysis: We will develop the COS in six phases. A parent involvement group and stakeholder steering committee have been established and have informed each planned phase: (1) systematic review of quantitative studies evaluating care and interventions provided after neonatal death, to describe interventions, outcomes and outcome measurement tools used to assess intervention effectiveness; (2) qualitative interviews with parents who have experienced neonatal death to identify outcomes important and relevant to them; (3) think-aloud interviews with stakeholders (bereaved parents, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders) to develop and refine an online survey; (4) real-time online international Delphi survey with bereaved parents, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders to shortlist outcomes for consideration in the COS; (5) adapted nominal group online consensus meetings with parents, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders to agree final COS and (6) identification of a preliminary set of measurement tools.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been granted for all activities to be undertaken by the University of Bristol Health Sciences Faculty Research Ethics Committee (reference: 15121). We will disseminate the findings via peer-reviewed publications and relevant academic and professional conferences.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020151365.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定一个核心结果集,用于评估高收入国家新生儿死亡后父母的干预措施和护理(icselect新生儿研究):一项混合方法研究方案。
新生儿死亡对父母的心理健康、财务和关系以及更广泛的家庭产生长期影响。目前,国家和国际上都在积极评估为婴儿死亡后的父母提供支持的干预措施。核心结果集(COSs)提供了利益攸关方认为重要的最低结果集,应在所有研究中对其进行评估,以支持证据综合和确定最有效的干预措施。我们的目标是制定一个COS,用于评估高收入国家新生儿死亡后的干预措施和护理,以支持未来的证据综合,并能够确定有效的干预措施和对父母的护理。方法与分析:我们将分六个阶段开发COS。已成立家长参与小组和利益攸关方指导委员会,并向每个计划阶段通报情况:(1)系统审查评估新生儿死亡后提供的护理和干预措施的定量研究,以描述用于评估干预措施有效性的干预措施、结果和结果测量工具;(2)与经历过新生儿死亡的父母进行定性访谈,以确定对他们重要和相关的结果;(3)与利益相关者(丧亲父母、医护专业人员和其他利益相关者)进行畅想访谈,以制定和完善在线调查;(4)对丧亲父母、医疗保健专业人员和其他利益相关者进行实时在线德尔菲调查,以列出供COS考虑的结果;(5)与家长、医疗保健专业人员和其他利益相关者进行名义上的小组在线共识会议,以商定最终COS;(6)确定一套初步的测量工具。伦理和传播:布里斯托尔大学健康科学学院研究伦理委员会开展的所有活动都获得了伦理批准(参考文献:15121)。我们将通过同行评审的出版物和相关的学术和专业会议传播研究结果。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42020151365。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Vitamin B12 deficiency in long-term metformin use and clinician awareness: a scoping review. Vision Intervention for Seeing Impaired Babies: Learning through Enrichment (VISIBLE) - protocol of a feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial. Analysis of risk factors for primary non-central malposition of peripherally inserted central catheter tip in neonates with different diseases admitted to neonatal surgical department: a case-control study. Providing care to domestically sex trafficked persons in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol. Electrical Stimulation of the Nucleus Accumbens for Severe, Refractory Self-Injurious Behaviour in Children (EASE-SIB): protocol for a randomised double-blinded crossover trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1