Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: learning from a theory crisis in psychology.

IF 4.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY BMC Biology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s12915-025-02134-w
Shinichi Nakagawa, David W Armitage, Tom Froese, Yefeng Yang, Malgorzata Lagisz
{"title":"Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: learning from a theory crisis in psychology.","authors":"Shinichi Nakagawa, David W Armitage, Tom Froese, Yefeng Yang, Malgorzata Lagisz","doi":"10.1186/s12915-025-02134-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While psychologists have extensively discussed the notion of a \"theory crisis\" arising from vague and incorrect hypotheses, there has been no debate about such a crisis in biology. However, biologists have long discussed communication failures between theoreticians and empiricists. We argue such failure is one aspect of a theory crisis because misapplied and misunderstood theories lead to poor hypotheses and research waste. We review its solutions and compare them with methodology-focused solutions proposed for replication crises. We conclude by discussing how promoting inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility (IDEA) in theoretical biology could contribute to ameliorating breakdowns in the theory-empirical cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":9339,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02134-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While psychologists have extensively discussed the notion of a "theory crisis" arising from vague and incorrect hypotheses, there has been no debate about such a crisis in biology. However, biologists have long discussed communication failures between theoreticians and empiricists. We argue such failure is one aspect of a theory crisis because misapplied and misunderstood theories lead to poor hypotheses and research waste. We review its solutions and compare them with methodology-focused solutions proposed for replication crises. We conclude by discussing how promoting inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility (IDEA) in theoretical biology could contribute to ameliorating breakdowns in the theory-empirical cycle.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物学中的错误假设和研究浪费:从心理学的理论危机中吸取教训。
虽然心理学家已经广泛讨论了由模糊和错误的假设引起的“理论危机”的概念,但在生物学中却没有关于这种危机的争论。然而,生物学家长期以来一直在讨论理论家和经验主义者之间的沟通失败。我们认为这种失败是理论危机的一个方面,因为错误应用和误解的理论导致了糟糕的假设和研究浪费。我们回顾了其解决方案,并将其与针对复制危机提出的以方法为重点的解决方案进行了比较。最后,我们讨论了促进理论生物学的包容性、多样性、公平性和可及性(IDEA)如何有助于改善理论-实证周期的崩溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Biology
BMC Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.90%
发文量
260
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biology is a broad scope journal covering all areas of biology. Our content includes research articles, new methods and tools. BMC Biology also publishes reviews, Q&A, and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the reproductive interactome and the origins of postmating-prezygotic reproductive divergence. The tiny germline chromosomes of Paramecium aurelia have an exceptionally high recombination rate and are capped by a new class of Helitrons. LMO7-mediated ubiquitination of SIRT3 promotes osteoarthritis progression: an investigation using machine learning and molecular dynamics simulations. Evaluating the role of coral trophic strategies in driving community shifts in response to heat stress via stable isotopes-based modeling. scDEBGCL: a deep embedding approach based on bipartite graph contrastive learning for single-cell RNA-seq data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1