Using Days Alive and Out of Hospital to measure inequities and explore pathways through which inequities emerge after coronary artery bypass grafting in Aotearoa New Zealand: a secondary data analysis using a retrospective cohort.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093479
Luke Boyle, Elana Curtis, Sarah-Jane Paine, Jade Tamatea, Thomas Lumley, Alan Forbes Merry
{"title":"Using Days Alive and Out of Hospital to measure inequities and explore pathways through which inequities emerge after coronary artery bypass grafting in Aotearoa New Zealand: a secondary data analysis using a retrospective cohort.","authors":"Luke Boyle, Elana Curtis, Sarah-Jane Paine, Jade Tamatea, Thomas Lumley, Alan Forbes Merry","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the use of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) as a sensitive measure of equity of outcomes after surgery by comparing outcomes after a coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) operation between Māori and non-Māori patients in Aotearoa New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>We calculated unadjusted and risk-adjusted DAOH scores at three time points (30, 90 and 365 days) and compare values between Māori and non-Māori using data from the New Zealand Ministry of Health (MoH) over a 9 year period. To assess the impact of different risk factors on differences in outcome, we risk-adjust for multiple factors individually and collectively, to begin to elucidate possible pathways for equity gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After our comparisons, Māori patients experienced fewer unadjusted DAOH<sub>90</sub> at seven out of nine deciles. After risk-adjustment, the differences ranged from 8 days to 0 days when considering different risk factors. The equity gap was widest at the lower deciles and was most reduced after adjusting for the Measuring Multi Morbidity (M3) score. The equity gap widened as the time period extended from 30 to 90 to 365 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Māori patients who underwent a CABG operation experienced fewer DAOH than non-Māori patients even after adjusting for multiple possible explanatory variables, and this difference increased over time postoperatively. Importantly, our results illustrate the value of DAOH as a sophisticated outcome metric that can reflect the complex and accumulative impacts of disadvantage and discrimination faced by Indigenous peoples both here in New Zealand and worldwide. It has considerable potential to increase our understanding of how and where inequities arise on the entire patient journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 2","pages":"e093479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the use of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) as a sensitive measure of equity of outcomes after surgery by comparing outcomes after a coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) operation between Māori and non-Māori patients in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: We calculated unadjusted and risk-adjusted DAOH scores at three time points (30, 90 and 365 days) and compare values between Māori and non-Māori using data from the New Zealand Ministry of Health (MoH) over a 9 year period. To assess the impact of different risk factors on differences in outcome, we risk-adjust for multiple factors individually and collectively, to begin to elucidate possible pathways for equity gaps.

Results: After our comparisons, Māori patients experienced fewer unadjusted DAOH90 at seven out of nine deciles. After risk-adjustment, the differences ranged from 8 days to 0 days when considering different risk factors. The equity gap was widest at the lower deciles and was most reduced after adjusting for the Measuring Multi Morbidity (M3) score. The equity gap widened as the time period extended from 30 to 90 to 365 days.

Conclusion: Māori patients who underwent a CABG operation experienced fewer DAOH than non-Māori patients even after adjusting for multiple possible explanatory variables, and this difference increased over time postoperatively. Importantly, our results illustrate the value of DAOH as a sophisticated outcome metric that can reflect the complex and accumulative impacts of disadvantage and discrimination faced by Indigenous peoples both here in New Zealand and worldwide. It has considerable potential to increase our understanding of how and where inequities arise on the entire patient journey.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用存活天数和出院天数来衡量不公平现象,并探索新西兰奥特罗阿冠状动脉搭桥术后不公平现象产生的途径:采用回顾性队列的二次数据分析。
目的:通过比较新西兰Aotearoa Māori和non-Māori患者的冠状动脉搭桥(CABG)手术后的结果,描述使用存活和出院天数(DAOH)作为手术后结果公平的敏感指标。主要和次要结果测量:我们计算了三个时间点(30,90和365天)未调整和风险调整的DAOH评分,并使用新西兰卫生部(MoH) 9年期间的数据比较Māori和non-Māori之间的值。为了评估不同风险因素对结果差异的影响,我们对多个因素进行了单独和集体的风险调整,以开始阐明公平差距的可能途径。结果:经过我们的比较,Māori患者在9个十分位数中有7个未调整的DAOH90较少。风险调整后,考虑不同的风险因素,差异在8 ~ 0天之间。在较低的十分位数,公平差距最大,并在调整计量多重发病率(M3)得分后最大程度地缩小。随着时间从30天延长至90天至365天,股权差距扩大。结论:即使在调整了多个可能的解释变量后,Māori接受CABG手术的患者的DAOH也少于non-Māori患者,并且这种差异随着术后时间的推移而增加。重要的是,我们的研究结果说明了DAOH作为一个复杂的结果指标的价值,它可以反映新西兰和世界各地土著人民所面临的不利和歧视的复杂和累积影响。它具有相当大的潜力,可以增加我们对整个患者旅程中不公平现象如何以及在何处出现的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Health outcomes and reinfection among COVID-19 survivors 4 years after hospital discharge in Wuhan, China: a cohort study. Trends in ethnic disparities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health interventions and the role of social investment and inclusive policies: a mixed-methods study in Ecuador, 2004-2018. Mapping the evidence landscape on lactation: a scoping review protocol applying a Bio-Psycho-Social-Ecological framework. Efficacy and Safety of preoperative Controlling Heart Rate in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ESCORT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1