Uptake of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) by Minoritized Patients: The Role of Modality Education.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000702
Ivelina Arnaoudova, Clara Wilson, Katherine Rizzolo, Jenny Shen, Nahian Ehtesham, Jennifer Wilson, Ladan Golestaneh
{"title":"Uptake of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) by Minoritized Patients: The Role of Modality Education.","authors":"Ivelina Arnaoudova, Clara Wilson, Katherine Rizzolo, Jenny Shen, Nahian Ehtesham, Jennifer Wilson, Ladan Golestaneh","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a cohort of patients with late-stage kidney disease who completed dialysis modality education and who self-identified as racial ethnic minorities, we studied characteristics of those choosing PD, and perception of usefulness of the education session in modality selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study of individuals with kidney failure cared for by nephrologists at Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, who were referred for modality education, we: 1-tested the association of patient characteristics with modality selection in 113 patients from 2021-2023, and 2-examined patient perception of the quality of modality education from 13 semi-structured interviews. We compared sociodemographic, clinical attributes, and patient responsiveness to attempts made by staff among those who selected and initiated PD to those who a-did not select PD, or b-initiated on HD urgently . We performed qualitative analysis of interviews to reach consensus on theoretical domain framework concepts and how they fit events in the kidney failure trajectory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to individuals who required urgent HD, those who selected, and were initiated on, PD were younger (54 yrs vs 66 yrs), had fewer comorbidities, and did not require as many attempts to schedule modality education. Qualitative analysis of interviews showed that experience with staff and quality of information conveyed during education was generally positive, but the following gaps were identified: lack of support for the emotional trauma of kidney failure diagnosis, inability to address structural barriers to PD specific to the patient population, and the lack of a deliberate program to lessen anxiety about the responsibility of PD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporation of tailored content that addresses clinical comorbidity, structural barriers to care and emotional trauma constitute aspects of modality education that can be improved to increase PD uptake among minoritized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In a cohort of patients with late-stage kidney disease who completed dialysis modality education and who self-identified as racial ethnic minorities, we studied characteristics of those choosing PD, and perception of usefulness of the education session in modality selection.

Methods: In this study of individuals with kidney failure cared for by nephrologists at Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, who were referred for modality education, we: 1-tested the association of patient characteristics with modality selection in 113 patients from 2021-2023, and 2-examined patient perception of the quality of modality education from 13 semi-structured interviews. We compared sociodemographic, clinical attributes, and patient responsiveness to attempts made by staff among those who selected and initiated PD to those who a-did not select PD, or b-initiated on HD urgently . We performed qualitative analysis of interviews to reach consensus on theoretical domain framework concepts and how they fit events in the kidney failure trajectory.

Results: Compared to individuals who required urgent HD, those who selected, and were initiated on, PD were younger (54 yrs vs 66 yrs), had fewer comorbidities, and did not require as many attempts to schedule modality education. Qualitative analysis of interviews showed that experience with staff and quality of information conveyed during education was generally positive, but the following gaps were identified: lack of support for the emotional trauma of kidney failure diagnosis, inability to address structural barriers to PD specific to the patient population, and the lack of a deliberate program to lessen anxiety about the responsibility of PD.

Conclusions: Incorporation of tailored content that addresses clinical comorbidity, structural barriers to care and emotional trauma constitute aspects of modality education that can be improved to increase PD uptake among minoritized patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lived Experiences of Older Adults with Advanced CKD and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study Uncovering Risk and Resilience Dynamics. Exosomes Derived from Dialysis Patients Serum enhance Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Calcification in Endothelial Cells. Peripheral Transcriptomics in Acute and Long-Term Kidney Dysfunction in SARS-CoV2 Infection. Uptake of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) by Minoritized Patients: The Role of Modality Education. Prevention and Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury Associated with High Dose Methotrexate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1