The Diagnostic Yield of Panel Versus Exome Sequencing to Identify Hereditary Cancer Disorders in Pediatric Cancer.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1097/MPH.0000000000003000
Shannon M Lozinsky, Carina A Iezzi, Dorota Gruber, Kenan Onel, Carolyn Fein Levy
{"title":"The Diagnostic Yield of Panel Versus Exome Sequencing to Identify Hereditary Cancer Disorders in Pediatric Cancer.","authors":"Shannon M Lozinsky, Carina A Iezzi, Dorota Gruber, Kenan Onel, Carolyn Fein Levy","doi":"10.1097/MPH.0000000000003000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess whether targeted exome sequencing (TES) outperforms next- generation sequencing (NGS) panels in detecting clinically actionable cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) in pediatric cancer patients. Patients with cancer underwent genetic counseling and NGS panel testing (27 or 64 genes). Simultaneously, a 616-gene targeted exome, including the NGS panel genes and 552 additional potential cancer-related genes, was conducted on the patients and their parents. Of 42 patients undergoing both tests, NGS panels identified an APC risk allele (RA) in a patient with ganglioglioma and a pathogenic RB1 variant in a patient with retinoblastoma. In addition to the variants found by NGS panels, TES detected a pathogenic MUTYH variant in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and a likely pathogenic (LP) BLM variant in another patient with ALL. TES also revealed a variant in candidate CPS genes, MC1R (RA) and EXT2 (LP), in a patient with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma, respectively. Despite identifying variants in candidate CPS genes ( MC1R , EXT2 ) not included on common NGS panels and known CPS genes ( MUTYH , BLM ) absent from this study's panels, the diagnostic yield of clinically actionable CPS variants did not substantially increase with TES compared with standard NGS panels in pediatric cancer patients. In conclusion, for most cases, panel testing remains appropriate for CPS diagnosis in pediatric cancer within typical clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000003000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess whether targeted exome sequencing (TES) outperforms next- generation sequencing (NGS) panels in detecting clinically actionable cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) in pediatric cancer patients. Patients with cancer underwent genetic counseling and NGS panel testing (27 or 64 genes). Simultaneously, a 616-gene targeted exome, including the NGS panel genes and 552 additional potential cancer-related genes, was conducted on the patients and their parents. Of 42 patients undergoing both tests, NGS panels identified an APC risk allele (RA) in a patient with ganglioglioma and a pathogenic RB1 variant in a patient with retinoblastoma. In addition to the variants found by NGS panels, TES detected a pathogenic MUTYH variant in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and a likely pathogenic (LP) BLM variant in another patient with ALL. TES also revealed a variant in candidate CPS genes, MC1R (RA) and EXT2 (LP), in a patient with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma, respectively. Despite identifying variants in candidate CPS genes ( MC1R , EXT2 ) not included on common NGS panels and known CPS genes ( MUTYH , BLM ) absent from this study's panels, the diagnostic yield of clinically actionable CPS variants did not substantially increase with TES compared with standard NGS panels in pediatric cancer patients. In conclusion, for most cases, panel testing remains appropriate for CPS diagnosis in pediatric cancer within typical clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面板与外显子组测序在儿童癌症中鉴定遗传性癌症疾病的诊断率。
本研究旨在评估靶向外显子组测序(TES)在检测儿科癌症患者临床可操作的癌症易感综合征(CPS)方面是否优于下一代测序(NGS)面板。癌症患者接受遗传咨询和NGS面板检测(27或64个基因)。同时,对患者及其父母进行了616个基因靶向外显子组,包括NGS面板基因和552个额外的潜在癌症相关基因。在接受两种检测的42例患者中,NGS小组在神经节胶质瘤患者中发现了APC风险等位基因(RA),在视网膜母细胞瘤患者中发现了致病性RB1变异。除了NGS小组发现的变异外,TES在急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者中检测到致病性MUTYH变异,在另一名ALL患者中检测到可能致病性(LP) BLM变异。TES还分别在一名胚胎横纹肌肉瘤和尤因肉瘤患者中发现了候选CPS基因MC1R (RA)和EXT2 (LP)的变异。尽管发现了未包括在普通NGS面板上的候选CPS基因(MC1R, EXT2)和未包括在本研究面板上的已知CPS基因(MUTYH, BLM)的变体,但在儿科癌症患者中,与标准NGS面板相比,TES的临床可操作CPS变体的诊出率并没有显著增加。总之,在大多数情况下,在典型的临床环境中,小组检测仍然适用于儿科癌症的CPS诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
415
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JPHO) reports on major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and blood diseases in children. The journal publishes original research, commentaries, historical insights, and clinical and laboratory observations.
期刊最新文献
Intraosseous Venous Malformation of the Rib With EWSR1-NFATC1 Fusion Mimicking Malignancy: A Pediatric Case Report. Excellent Outcome of Residual Pulmonary Metastases in Initially High Burden Metastatic Hepatoblastoma: A Case Series. Follicular Dendritic Cell Sarcoma in an Adolescent Patient. Phase 2, Multicenter Studies of Pegaspargase in Pediatric Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Russia: Comparative Study of Liquid and Lyophilized Pegaspargase and Roll-Over Study of Lyophilized Formulation. Infectious Complications in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Treated for Acute Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1