The prevalence of congenital cervical stenosis differs based on race.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.011
Freddy Jacome, Sia Cho, Jason Tegethoff, Justin J Lee, David M Hiltzik, Srikanth N Divi, Alpesh A Patel, Wellington Hsu
{"title":"The prevalence of congenital cervical stenosis differs based on race.","authors":"Freddy Jacome, Sia Cho, Jason Tegethoff, Justin J Lee, David M Hiltzik, Srikanth N Divi, Alpesh A Patel, Wellington Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital cervical stenosis (CCS) is a rare condition involving a narrowed spinal canal due to developmental anomalies. CCS heightens the risk of neurologic deficits and acute spinal cord injury posttrauma, influencing return-to-play decisions for contact athletes. Additionally, CCS patients are prone to cervical myelopathy as degenerative changes progress with age. Limited evidence-based literature exists addressing the epidemiology of CCS, including the effects of race.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the anatomical differences and prevalence of CCS as it pertains to race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Single center retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>A total of 343 patients with cervicalgia between the years of 1999 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Radiographic measurements of anatomical parameters were collected and CCS was defined as a sagittal canal diameter (SCD) of less than 10 mm at 2 or more vertebral levels (C3-7) at the pedicle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened 5,395 cervical MRIs from a single institution. Exclusion criteria included patients under 18 and over 50 years, prior cervical spine surgery, congenital fusions, spinal malignancy, or active smoking history. For each patient, axial measurements were taken at each level, including coronal vertebral body length, anteroposterior vertebral body length, pedicle width, pedicle length, laminar length, anteroposterior lateral mass length, posterior canal distance, apex-to-vertebral body, lamina-disc angle (LDA), lamina-pedicle angle, and anteroposterior spinal cord diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCS prevalence varied significantly among ethnic groups; Black (39.3%), Asian (33.6%), and Hispanic (22%) patients demonstrated significantly higher CCS rates than White patients (7.5%) (x<sup>2</sup> [3, N=343] = 30.04, p<.05). Blacks and Asians showed consistently smaller SCDs at all pedicle levels compared to Whites, who had the largest SCDs overall (p<.001). Average SCDs were 11.4 mm (White), 10.4 mm (Black), 10.5 mm (Asian), and 11 mm (Hispanic). Additionally, LDAs were larger in Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics compared to Whites, leading to a significantly decreased cross-sectional canal area (p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study indicates a statistically significant correlation between race/ethnicity and CCS prevalence. Black and Asian patients had the highest CCS rates, smallest SCDs, and largest LDAs. These anatomical differences may predispose these subjects to the development of cervical myelopathy compared to those with normal spinal canal diameters. Increased knowledge base of the epidemiology of this condition may lead to personalized clinical management and possibly early intervention to prevent spinal cord injuries in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Congenital cervical stenosis (CCS) is a rare condition involving a narrowed spinal canal due to developmental anomalies. CCS heightens the risk of neurologic deficits and acute spinal cord injury posttrauma, influencing return-to-play decisions for contact athletes. Additionally, CCS patients are prone to cervical myelopathy as degenerative changes progress with age. Limited evidence-based literature exists addressing the epidemiology of CCS, including the effects of race.

Purpose: To investigate the anatomical differences and prevalence of CCS as it pertains to race and ethnicity.

Study design: Single center retrospective cross-sectional study.

Patient sample: A total of 343 patients with cervicalgia between the years of 1999 and 2023.

Outcome measures: Radiographic measurements of anatomical parameters were collected and CCS was defined as a sagittal canal diameter (SCD) of less than 10 mm at 2 or more vertebral levels (C3-7) at the pedicle.

Methods: We screened 5,395 cervical MRIs from a single institution. Exclusion criteria included patients under 18 and over 50 years, prior cervical spine surgery, congenital fusions, spinal malignancy, or active smoking history. For each patient, axial measurements were taken at each level, including coronal vertebral body length, anteroposterior vertebral body length, pedicle width, pedicle length, laminar length, anteroposterior lateral mass length, posterior canal distance, apex-to-vertebral body, lamina-disc angle (LDA), lamina-pedicle angle, and anteroposterior spinal cord diameter.

Results: CCS prevalence varied significantly among ethnic groups; Black (39.3%), Asian (33.6%), and Hispanic (22%) patients demonstrated significantly higher CCS rates than White patients (7.5%) (x2 [3, N=343] = 30.04, p<.05). Blacks and Asians showed consistently smaller SCDs at all pedicle levels compared to Whites, who had the largest SCDs overall (p<.001). Average SCDs were 11.4 mm (White), 10.4 mm (Black), 10.5 mm (Asian), and 11 mm (Hispanic). Additionally, LDAs were larger in Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics compared to Whites, leading to a significantly decreased cross-sectional canal area (p<.001).

Conclusions: Our study indicates a statistically significant correlation between race/ethnicity and CCS prevalence. Black and Asian patients had the highest CCS rates, smallest SCDs, and largest LDAs. These anatomical differences may predispose these subjects to the development of cervical myelopathy compared to those with normal spinal canal diameters. Increased knowledge base of the epidemiology of this condition may lead to personalized clinical management and possibly early intervention to prevent spinal cord injuries in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Failure forces of different interspinous vertebropexy techniques. The Dural Deviation Ratio: A Novel Indicator for Preoperative Differentiation of Intradural Extension in Spinal Dumbbell Tumors Schwannomas Using Axial T2-weighted MRI. Tri-cortical Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Most Cranial Instrumented Segment to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis. Incidental durotomy should not preclude same-day discharge from lumbar spine surgery. Meetings Calendar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1