MPRAGElike: A novel approach to generate T1w images from multi-contrast gradient echo images for brain segmentation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1002/mrm.30453
Marc-Antoine Fortin, Rüdiger Stirnberg, Yannik Völzke, Laurent Lamalle, Eberhard Pracht, Daniel Löwen, Tony Stöcker, Pål Erik Goa
{"title":"MPRAGE<sub>like</sub>: A novel approach to generate T1w images from multi-contrast gradient echo images for brain segmentation.","authors":"Marc-Antoine Fortin, Rüdiger Stirnberg, Yannik Völzke, Laurent Lamalle, Eberhard Pracht, Daniel Löwen, Tony Stöcker, Pål Erik Goa","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Brain segmentation and multi-parameter mapping (MPM) are important steps in neurodegenerative disease characterization. However, acquiring both a high-resolution T1w sequence like MPRAGE (standard input to brain segmentation) and an MPM in the same neuroimaging protocol increases scan time and patient discomfort, making it difficult to combine both in clinical examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A novel approach to synthesize T1w images from MPM images, named MPRAGE<sub>like</sub>, is proposed and compared to the standard technique used to produce synthetic MPRAGE images (synMPRAGE). Twenty-three healthy subjects were scanned with the same imaging protocol at three different 7T sites using universal parallel transmit RF pulses. SNR, CNR, and automatic brain segmentation results from both MPRAGE<sub>like</sub> and synMPRAGE were compared against an acquired MPRAGE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed MPRAGE<sub>like</sub> technique produced higher SNR values than synMPRAGE for all regions evaluated while also having higher CNR values for subcortical structures. MPRAGE was still the image with the highest SNR values overall. For automatic brain segmentation, MPRAGE<sub>like</sub> outperformed synMPRAGE when compared to MPRAGE (median Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.90 versus 0.29 and Average Asymmetric Surface Distance of 0.33 versus 2.93 mm, respectively), in addition to being simple, flexible, and considerably more robust to low image quality than synMPRAGE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MPRAGE<sub>like</sub> technique can provide a better and more reliable alternative to synMPRAGE as a substitute for MPRAGE, especially when automatic brain segmentation is of interest and scan time is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Brain segmentation and multi-parameter mapping (MPM) are important steps in neurodegenerative disease characterization. However, acquiring both a high-resolution T1w sequence like MPRAGE (standard input to brain segmentation) and an MPM in the same neuroimaging protocol increases scan time and patient discomfort, making it difficult to combine both in clinical examinations.

Methods: A novel approach to synthesize T1w images from MPM images, named MPRAGElike, is proposed and compared to the standard technique used to produce synthetic MPRAGE images (synMPRAGE). Twenty-three healthy subjects were scanned with the same imaging protocol at three different 7T sites using universal parallel transmit RF pulses. SNR, CNR, and automatic brain segmentation results from both MPRAGElike and synMPRAGE were compared against an acquired MPRAGE.

Results: The proposed MPRAGElike technique produced higher SNR values than synMPRAGE for all regions evaluated while also having higher CNR values for subcortical structures. MPRAGE was still the image with the highest SNR values overall. For automatic brain segmentation, MPRAGElike outperformed synMPRAGE when compared to MPRAGE (median Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.90 versus 0.29 and Average Asymmetric Surface Distance of 0.33 versus 2.93 mm, respectively), in addition to being simple, flexible, and considerably more robust to low image quality than synMPRAGE.

Conclusion: The MPRAGElike technique can provide a better and more reliable alternative to synMPRAGE as a substitute for MPRAGE, especially when automatic brain segmentation is of interest and scan time is limited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM diffusion study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 1: In vivo small-animal imaging. Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study Group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 3-Ex vivo imaging: Data processing, comparisons with microscopy, and tractography. On the RF safety of titanium mesh head implants in 7 T MRI systems: an investigation. 3D joint T1/T1 ρ/T2 mapping and water-fat imaging for contrast-agent free myocardial tissue characterization at 1.5T. Whole liver phase-based R2 mapping in liver iron overload within a breath-hold.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1