Efficacy and Safety of Mirogabalin Therapy for Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (MICHEL Study): A Pilot Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1159/000543798
Hiroko Bando, Aya Sawa, Hiroko Bando, Riko Sato, Tomohei Matsuo, Mai Okazaki, Sachie Hashimoto, Akiko Iguchi-Manaka, Hisato Hara
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Mirogabalin Therapy for Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (MICHEL Study): A Pilot Study.","authors":"Hiroko Bando, Aya Sawa, Hiroko Bando, Riko Sato, Tomohei Matsuo, Mai Okazaki, Sachie Hashimoto, Akiko Iguchi-Manaka, Hisato Hara","doi":"10.1159/000543798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequent adverse event without an established, standard treatment. As mirogabalin is a gabapentinoid confirmed useful for diabetic, peripheral neuropathic pain, we examined the efficacy of mirogabalin for CIPN using quantitative sensory and pain analytical devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-arm, open-label, prospective study conducted at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between April 2022 to April 2024. Patients with grade 2 or higher CIPN during weekly paclitaxel treatment for primary breast cancer were enrolled and received mirogabalin orally for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for peripheral neuropathy. Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX) scores were obtained, and PainVision was used as an objective CIPN evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The median VAS score before starting mirogabalin was 13.50 for the hands and 25.00 for the feet. After 4 weeks of treatment, there was significant worsening in the hands (VAS score of 37.00) but no significant difference was observed for the feet. There were no significant differences in PNQ of the limbs between before and 4 weeks after the mirogabalin treatment, although the mean of the Neurotoxicity Subscale of FACT/GOG-NTX significantly worsened. Median PainVision scores for feet also significantly worsened from 50.30 to 89.40, but no significant change was observed for hands. PainVision feet score changes negatively correlated with FACT/GOG-NTX total scores. In the patient satisfaction survey, 14 patients (70%) were satisfied with mirogabalin and 15 patients (75%) wanted to continue.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although mirogabalin was not wholly effective for CIPN caused by paclitaxel treatment in breast cancer patients, the satisfaction survey suggests some patient-perceived benefits which cannot be detected by conventional evaluation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"985-996"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequent adverse event without an established, standard treatment. As mirogabalin is a gabapentinoid confirmed useful for diabetic, peripheral neuropathic pain, we examined the efficacy of mirogabalin for CIPN using quantitative sensory and pain analytical devices.

Methods: This was a single-arm, open-label, prospective study conducted at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between April 2022 to April 2024. Patients with grade 2 or higher CIPN during weekly paclitaxel treatment for primary breast cancer were enrolled and received mirogabalin orally for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for peripheral neuropathy. Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX) scores were obtained, and PainVision was used as an objective CIPN evaluation.

Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The median VAS score before starting mirogabalin was 13.50 for the hands and 25.00 for the feet. After 4 weeks of treatment, there was significant worsening in the hands (VAS score of 37.00) but no significant difference was observed for the feet. There were no significant differences in PNQ of the limbs between before and 4 weeks after the mirogabalin treatment, although the mean of the Neurotoxicity Subscale of FACT/GOG-NTX significantly worsened. Median PainVision scores for feet also significantly worsened from 50.30 to 89.40, but no significant change was observed for hands. PainVision feet score changes negatively correlated with FACT/GOG-NTX total scores. In the patient satisfaction survey, 14 patients (70%) were satisfied with mirogabalin and 15 patients (75%) wanted to continue.

Conclusions: Although mirogabalin was not wholly effective for CIPN caused by paclitaxel treatment in breast cancer patients, the satisfaction survey suggests some patient-perceived benefits which cannot be detected by conventional evaluation methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米加巴林治疗紫杉醇诱导的周围神经病变的疗效和安全性(MICHEL研究):一项初步研究。
化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是一种常见的不良事件,没有既定的标准治疗方法。由于米罗巴林是一种加巴喷丁类药物,被证实对糖尿病、周围神经性疼痛有效,我们使用定量感觉和疼痛分析设备检查了米罗巴林对CIPN的疗效。方法:这是一项单臂、开放标签、前瞻性研究,于2022年4月至2024年4月在筑波大学医院进行。在每周一次紫杉醇治疗原发性乳腺癌期间,CIPN为2级或更高的患者被纳入研究,并口服米罗巴林4周。主要终点是周围神经病变的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。获得患者神经毒性问卷(PNQ)和肿瘤治疗组/妇科肿瘤组功能评估-神经毒性(FACT/GOG-NTX)评分,并使用PainVision作为客观CIPN评价。结果共纳入20例患者。在开始使用米洛巴林之前,手部和足部的VAS评分中位数分别为13.50和25.00。治疗4周后,手部明显恶化(VAS评分为37.00),但足部无明显差异。尽管FACT/GOG-NTX神经毒性量表的平均值明显恶化,但在米罗巴林治疗前和治疗后4周,肢体PNQ无显著差异。脚部的疼痛视觉评分中位数也从50.30明显恶化到89.40,但手部没有明显变化。PainVision足部评分变化与FACT/GOG-NTX总分呈负相关。在患者满意度调查中,14例患者(70%)对米罗巴林满意,15例患者(75%)希望继续使用。结论虽然米罗巴林对紫杉醇治疗引起的乳腺癌患者CIPN并非完全有效,但满意度调查显示,一些患者感知到的益处是常规评估方法无法检测到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
期刊最新文献
Hypoxia-Induced microRNAs confer survival advantage in bladder cancer by fine-tuning oncogenic Pathways. Transforming Acute Myeloid Leukemia Care Through Precision Medicine: Integrating Genomic Profiling, Measurable Residual Disease, and Targeted Therapies. Impact of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients. Can splenic characteristics predict rectal cancer chemotherapy toxicity and treatment outcomes in rectal cancer patients? Nivolumab versus Best Supportive Care after failure of Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with ECOG 3 or 4: A Propensity Matched Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1