"It was simply disturbing" - evaluation of the stress factors of nursing staff on special COVID-19 wards during the pandemic: a qualitative study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02773-y
Lea Kiefer, Christian Volberg, Jan Adriaan Graw, Stefan Bösner
{"title":"\"It was simply disturbing\" - evaluation of the stress factors of nursing staff on special COVID-19 wards during the pandemic: a qualitative study.","authors":"Lea Kiefer, Christian Volberg, Jan Adriaan Graw, Stefan Bösner","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02773-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has posed enormous challenges for healthcare systems worldwide. The strain on nursing staff working in special COVID-19 wards during the pandemic increased dramatically. To support nursing staff more effectively in similar situations in the future, it is important to identify specific stress factors to design effective support measures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To collect the experiences and lessons learned from nursing staff who have been affected by COVID-19 pandemic on a special COVID-19 ward that were perceived as stressful. The findings should contribute to the development of specific support measures for healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative interview study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We interviewed 14 members of nursing staff who worked on COVID-19 wards at two University Hospitals about their working experiences during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We were able to identify 10 key stress factors. These included an increased workload, communication deficits, a difficult personnel situation, subjective pressure, the establishment of a new ward, a shortage of material resources, inadequate hygiene conditions, a lack of opportunities to cope with the situation, the absence of relatives and decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identification of various stress factors highlights the urgent need for comprehensive support measures. These measures could include concepts for dealing with physical and psychosocial stress, the provision of resources and sufficient personnel support. It remains crucial to proactively take preventive and supportive measures to reduce the burden and moral distress of nursing staff and protect their health in the long term. Despite the pandemic, the implications of our findings remain relevant for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02773-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed enormous challenges for healthcare systems worldwide. The strain on nursing staff working in special COVID-19 wards during the pandemic increased dramatically. To support nursing staff more effectively in similar situations in the future, it is important to identify specific stress factors to design effective support measures.

Objective: To collect the experiences and lessons learned from nursing staff who have been affected by COVID-19 pandemic on a special COVID-19 ward that were perceived as stressful. The findings should contribute to the development of specific support measures for healthcare professionals.

Design: Qualitative interview study.

Setting: We interviewed 14 members of nursing staff who worked on COVID-19 wards at two University Hospitals about their working experiences during the pandemic.

Results: We were able to identify 10 key stress factors. These included an increased workload, communication deficits, a difficult personnel situation, subjective pressure, the establishment of a new ward, a shortage of material resources, inadequate hygiene conditions, a lack of opportunities to cope with the situation, the absence of relatives and decision making.

Conclusion: The identification of various stress factors highlights the urgent need for comprehensive support measures. These measures could include concepts for dealing with physical and psychosocial stress, the provision of resources and sufficient personnel support. It remains crucial to proactively take preventive and supportive measures to reduce the burden and moral distress of nursing staff and protect their health in the long term. Despite the pandemic, the implications of our findings remain relevant for the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“简直令人不安”——大流行期间COVID-19特殊病房护理人员压力因素评估:一项定性研究。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行给全球卫生保健系统带来了巨大挑战。大流行期间,在COVID-19特殊病房工作的护理人员的压力急剧增加。为使护理人员今后在类似情况下更有效地支持护理人员,识别特定的应激因素以设计有效的支持措施是很重要的。目的:收集受COVID-19大流行影响的护理人员在COVID-19特殊病房感受到压力的经验教训。研究结果应有助于制定针对卫生保健专业人员的具体支持措施。设计:定性访谈研究。环境:我们采访了14名在两所大学医院COVID-19病房工作的护理人员,了解他们在大流行期间的工作经历。结果:我们能够识别出10个关键的应激因素。其中包括工作量增加、沟通不足、人事困难、主观压力、建立新病房、物质资源短缺、卫生条件不佳、缺乏应付这种情况的机会、没有亲属和决策。结论:各种应激因素的识别突出了综合支持措施的迫切需要。这些措施可包括处理身体和心理压力的概念、提供资源和充分的人员支助。积极采取预防性和支持性措施,减轻护理人员的负担和精神痛苦,并长期保护他们的健康,仍然至关重要。尽管大流行,但我们的研究结果对未来仍然具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Watson's Human Caring Theory-based nursing care on fear of childbirth and birth experience: a randomized controlled trial. NAIL-G: a conceptual best-fit framework for nursing ai literacy and governance anchored in socio-technical safety science. Effect of nursing guidelines for mothers on selected postoperative outcomes among their children with vesicoureteral reflux. Attitudes of polish nurses and physicians towards persons with disabilities: cross-sectional study. Effectiveness of low-fidelity versus high-fidelity interprofessional simulation on the acquisition of theoretical and practical knowledge of arterial blood gas testing: a parallel randomized controlled trial (ELVHIS-ABG-RCT) protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1