Outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention according to lesion complexity.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Eurointervention Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00755
Sang Yoon Lee, Seung-Jae Lee, Woochan Kwon, Seung Hun Lee, Doosup Shin, Sang Yeub Lee, Sang Min Kim, Kyeong Ho Yun, Jae Young Cho, Chan Joon Kim, Hyo-Suk Ahn, Chang-Wook Nam, Hyuck-Jun Yoon, Yong Hwan Park, Wang Soo Lee, Ki Hong Choi, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Jong-Young Lee, Joo Myung Lee, The Renovate-Complex-Pci Investigators
{"title":"Outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention according to lesion complexity.","authors":"Sang Yoon Lee, Seung-Jae Lee, Woochan Kwon, Seung Hun Lee, Doosup Shin, Sang Yeub Lee, Sang Min Kim, Kyeong Ho Yun, Jae Young Cho, Chan Joon Kim, Hyo-Suk Ahn, Chang-Wook Nam, Hyuck-Jun Yoon, Yong Hwan Park, Wang Soo Lee, Ki Hong Choi, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Jong-Young Lee, Joo Myung Lee, The Renovate-Complex-Pci Investigators","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent trials have shown that intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical outcome, as compared to angiography-guided PCI, in complex coronary artery lesions. However, it is unclear whether this benefit is affected by overall lesion complexity in each patient.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present study sought to investigate the impact of overall lesion complexity on the benefit of IVI-guided PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4,611 patients with complex coronary artery lesions from the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial (n=1,639) and the institutional registry of the Samsung Medical Center (n=2,972) were classified according to the number of complex lesion features found in each patient. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cutoff value for the number of complex lesion features to predict TVF, determined using the maximally selected log-rank test, was 3. Patients with ≥3 complex lesion features had a higher risk of TVF than those with <3 complex lesion features (11.0% vs 7.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-1.96; p<0.001). IVI-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk of TVF compared with angiography-guided PCI in both groups (≥3 complex lesion features: 7.4% vs 14.4%, HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.69; p<0.001; <3 complex lesion features: 5.7% vs 8.1%, HR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53-0.98; p=0.039). The benefit of IVI-guided PCI tended to increase as the number of complex lesion features increased (absolute risk reduction for TVF: -0.012 vs -0.027 vs -0.055 vs -0.077, respectively, for 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs ≥4 complex lesion features; interaction p=0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with complex coronary artery lesions, IVI-guided PCI showed a lower risk of TVF across all degrees of lesion complexity. The prognostic benefit of IVI-guided PCI tended to increase as patients had more complex lesion features. (RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03381872]; Institutional cardiovascular catheterisation database of the Samsung Medical Center [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03870815]).</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"21 3","pages":"e171-e182"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00755","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent trials have shown that intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical outcome, as compared to angiography-guided PCI, in complex coronary artery lesions. However, it is unclear whether this benefit is affected by overall lesion complexity in each patient.

Aims: The present study sought to investigate the impact of overall lesion complexity on the benefit of IVI-guided PCI.

Methods: A total of 4,611 patients with complex coronary artery lesions from the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial (n=1,639) and the institutional registry of the Samsung Medical Center (n=2,972) were classified according to the number of complex lesion features found in each patient. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation.

Results: The cutoff value for the number of complex lesion features to predict TVF, determined using the maximally selected log-rank test, was 3. Patients with ≥3 complex lesion features had a higher risk of TVF than those with <3 complex lesion features (11.0% vs 7.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-1.96; p<0.001). IVI-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk of TVF compared with angiography-guided PCI in both groups (≥3 complex lesion features: 7.4% vs 14.4%, HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.69; p<0.001; <3 complex lesion features: 5.7% vs 8.1%, HR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53-0.98; p=0.039). The benefit of IVI-guided PCI tended to increase as the number of complex lesion features increased (absolute risk reduction for TVF: -0.012 vs -0.027 vs -0.055 vs -0.077, respectively, for 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs ≥4 complex lesion features; interaction p=0.048).

Conclusions: In patients with complex coronary artery lesions, IVI-guided PCI showed a lower risk of TVF across all degrees of lesion complexity. The prognostic benefit of IVI-guided PCI tended to increase as patients had more complex lesion features. (RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03381872]; Institutional cardiovascular catheterisation database of the Samsung Medical Center [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03870815]).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据病变复杂程度进行血管内成像引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
背景:最近的试验表明,在复杂的冠状动脉病变中,与血管造影引导下的PCI相比,血管内成像(IVI)引导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)改善了临床结果。然而,目前尚不清楚这种获益是否受到每个患者总体病变复杂性的影响。目的:本研究旨在探讨总体病变复杂性对ivi引导下PCI疗效的影响。方法:根据每位患者发现的复杂病变特征的数量,对来自RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI试验(n=1,639)和三星医疗中心机构登记(n=2,972)的4,611例复杂冠状动脉病变患者进行分类。主要终点是3年时靶血管衰竭(TVF)、心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或靶血管重建的综合结果。结果:使用最大选择的log-rank检验确定的预测TVF的复杂病变特征数量的截止值为3。具有≥3个复杂病变特征的患者发生TVF的风险高于具有以上特征的患者。结论:在复杂冠状动脉病变的患者中,在所有病变复杂程度上,ivi引导下的PCI均显示较低的TVF风险。随着患者病变特征更加复杂,ivi引导下PCI的预后益处趋于增加。[endnoter.com];三星医疗中心机构心血管导管数据库[ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03870815])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Effect of beta blocker withholding or withdrawal after myocardial infarction without reduced ejection fraction on ischaemic events: a post hoc analysis from the REBOOT trial. Diagnosis, risk stratification, and early management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Beta blockers after MI: safe for the few, still relevant for the many. Abbreviated or standard antiplatelet therapy after PCI in HBR patients with chronic kidney disease: a prespecified analysis from the MASTER DAPT trial. Reducer migration and coronary sinus thrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1