Comparative Assessment of Antibiotics and Probiotics: Adjuvants in Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment for Smokers With Generalized Periodontitis.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2025-02-02 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.78394
Sujay Shah, Kinjal S Engineer, Rutu Shah, Hiral Shah, Shreya Gajjar, Santosh Kumar, Mainul Haque
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Antibiotics and Probiotics: Adjuvants in Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment for Smokers With Generalized Periodontitis.","authors":"Sujay Shah, Kinjal S Engineer, Rutu Shah, Hiral Shah, Shreya Gajjar, Santosh Kumar, Mainul Haque","doi":"10.7759/cureus.78394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Humankind is suffering from the misuse and overuse of antibiotics, leading to antibiotic resistance. At this point, probiotics, if found effective, can lead to a better future. Probiotics are nothing but a colony of living-friendly bacteria. <i>Lactobacillus reuteri</i> is essential for use as a probiotic among many healthy bacteria. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of probiotics in periodontal treatment. Methods One hundred smokers diagnosed with chronic generalized periodontitis were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A received a seven-day course of amoxicillin 500 mg three a day and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily, followed by 30 days of probiotics, while Group B received a placebo antibiotic for seven days and 30 days of <i>L. reuteri</i> probiotics (2×10⁸ CFU daily). Periodontal parameters, including plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), attachment loss (AL), and bleeding on probing (BOP), were utilized to asses at baseline, month one, and month one. Baseline differences were adjusted using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model. Results At month three, Group B (probiotics) showed a significantly lower PI (0.52±0.49 vs. 0.88±0.52, p<0.001) and a 23% greater reduction in PD (p=0.004) compared to Group A (antibiotics + probiotics). These findings highlight the effectiveness of probiotics alone in improving periodontal health in smokers. Conclusions Both groups showed equal effectiveness in improving periodontal health. Hence, probiotics should be preferred over antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 2","pages":"e78394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Humankind is suffering from the misuse and overuse of antibiotics, leading to antibiotic resistance. At this point, probiotics, if found effective, can lead to a better future. Probiotics are nothing but a colony of living-friendly bacteria. Lactobacillus reuteri is essential for use as a probiotic among many healthy bacteria. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of probiotics in periodontal treatment. Methods One hundred smokers diagnosed with chronic generalized periodontitis were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A received a seven-day course of amoxicillin 500 mg three a day and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily, followed by 30 days of probiotics, while Group B received a placebo antibiotic for seven days and 30 days of L. reuteri probiotics (2×10⁸ CFU daily). Periodontal parameters, including plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), attachment loss (AL), and bleeding on probing (BOP), were utilized to asses at baseline, month one, and month one. Baseline differences were adjusted using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model. Results At month three, Group B (probiotics) showed a significantly lower PI (0.52±0.49 vs. 0.88±0.52, p<0.001) and a 23% greater reduction in PD (p=0.004) compared to Group A (antibiotics + probiotics). These findings highlight the effectiveness of probiotics alone in improving periodontal health in smokers. Conclusions Both groups showed equal effectiveness in improving periodontal health. Hence, probiotics should be preferred over antibiotics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗生素和益生菌:辅助剂在吸烟者广泛性牙周炎非手术治疗中的比较评价。
人类正在遭受抗生素的滥用和过度使用,导致抗生素耐药性。在这一点上,如果发现益生菌有效,可以带来更美好的未来。益生菌只不过是一群对生物友好的细菌。罗伊氏乳杆菌是许多健康细菌中必不可少的益生菌。本研究旨在比较益生菌在牙周治疗中的效果。方法将100例诊断为慢性广泛性牙周炎的吸烟者随机分为两组。A组接受为期7天的疗程,阿莫西林500毫克,每天3次,甲硝唑500毫克,每天2次,随后服用益生菌30天,而B组接受安慰剂抗生素7天,30天服用罗伊氏乳杆菌益生菌(2×10⁸CFU,每天)。牙周参数,包括菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊深度(PD)、附着丧失(AL)和探诊出血(BOP),用于基线、第一个月和第一个月的评估。采用广义估计方程(GEE)模型调整基线差异。结果在第3个月时,B组(益生菌)的PI明显低于对照组(0.52±0.49 vs. 0.88±0.52,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gliosarcoma: A Case Series and Comprehensive Literature Review. E-health Literacy and the Impact of Telehealth on Treatment Compliance and Accessibility. Enterobius vermicularis in Paediatric Appendicectomy Patients in Far North Queensland, Australia: A Retrospective Study. Integrating Planetary Health Into Interprofessional Education: A Scoping Review. Prognostic Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Australian Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1