Assessment of activity and severity of inflammatory bowel disease in cross-sectional imaging techniques: a systematic review.

Arianna Dal Buono, Francesco Faita, Alessandro Armuzzi, Vipul Jairath, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Mariangela Allocca
{"title":"Assessment of activity and severity of inflammatory bowel disease in cross-sectional imaging techniques: a systematic review.","authors":"Arianna Dal Buono, Francesco Faita, Alessandro Armuzzi, Vipul Jairath, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Mariangela Allocca","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Cross-sectional imaging techniques, including intestinal ultrasonography (IUS), computed tomography enterography (CTE), magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), are increasingly used for the evaluation of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We aimed to systematically review literature evidence on the assessment of disease activity, and/or severity through cross-sectional imaging in IBD patients, and to offer guidance on their most effective utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify citations pertaining to the assessment of disease activity and/or severity at cross-sectional imaging techniques compared to a reference standard (ie, other radiological techniques, endoscopy, histopathology, and surgery) in IBD patients published until December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 179 papers published between 1990 and 2023 were included, with a total of 10 988 IBD patients (9304 Crohn's disease [84.7%], 1206 ulcerative colitis [11.0%], 38 IBD-U [0.3%], 440 unspecified [4.0%]). Of the 179 studies, 39 investigated IUS, 22/179 CTE, and 101/179 MRE. In the remaining papers, 2 techniques were addressed together. In 81.6% of the papers, endoscopy (with or without histopathology) was used as a reference standard. All studies included evaluated disease activity, while just over half (100/179, 55.8%) also evaluated disease severity of the addressed cross-sectional methodology. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of IUS, MRE, and CTE compared to the reference standard were 60%-99%, 60%-100%, and 70%-99%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All cross-sectional imaging techniques demonstrated moderate-to-good accuracy in assessing disease activity and severity of IBD. This finding highlights the potential, especially for MRE and IUS to be widely utilized in managing IBD in both clinical practice and clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Cross-sectional imaging techniques, including intestinal ultrasonography (IUS), computed tomography enterography (CTE), magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), are increasingly used for the evaluation of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We aimed to systematically review literature evidence on the assessment of disease activity, and/or severity through cross-sectional imaging in IBD patients, and to offer guidance on their most effective utilization.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify citations pertaining to the assessment of disease activity and/or severity at cross-sectional imaging techniques compared to a reference standard (ie, other radiological techniques, endoscopy, histopathology, and surgery) in IBD patients published until December 2023.

Results: Overall, 179 papers published between 1990 and 2023 were included, with a total of 10 988 IBD patients (9304 Crohn's disease [84.7%], 1206 ulcerative colitis [11.0%], 38 IBD-U [0.3%], 440 unspecified [4.0%]). Of the 179 studies, 39 investigated IUS, 22/179 CTE, and 101/179 MRE. In the remaining papers, 2 techniques were addressed together. In 81.6% of the papers, endoscopy (with or without histopathology) was used as a reference standard. All studies included evaluated disease activity, while just over half (100/179, 55.8%) also evaluated disease severity of the addressed cross-sectional methodology. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of IUS, MRE, and CTE compared to the reference standard were 60%-99%, 60%-100%, and 70%-99%, respectively.

Conclusions: All cross-sectional imaging techniques demonstrated moderate-to-good accuracy in assessing disease activity and severity of IBD. This finding highlights the potential, especially for MRE and IUS to be widely utilized in managing IBD in both clinical practice and clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估炎症性肠病的活动性和严重程度的横断成像技术:一个系统的回顾。
背景和目的:肠超声(IUS)、计算机断层肠摄影(CTE)、磁共振肠摄影(MRE)等横断面成像技术越来越多地用于炎症性肠病(IBD)的评估。我们的目的是系统地回顾关于通过IBD患者的横断面成像评估疾病活动性和/或严重程度的文献证据,并为其最有效的应用提供指导。方法:我们对PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus进行了系统回顾,以确定与参考标准(即其他放射学技术、内窥镜检查、组织病理学和手术)相比,在IBD患者中发表的有关疾病活动性和/或严重程度评估的引用。结果:总体纳入1990 - 2023年间发表的179篇论文,共10988例IBD患者(其中CD 9304例[84.7%],UC 1206例[11.0%],IBD- u 38例[0.3%],未明确的440例[4.0%])。39/179项研究研究了IUS, 22/179 CTE, 101/179 MRE,其余研究将两种技术放在一起讨论。81.6%的论文以内镜检查(伴或不伴组织病理学检查)作为参考标准。所有研究都评估了疾病活动性,而超过一半(100/179,55.8%)的研究也评估了所讨论的横断面方法的疾病严重程度。与参比标准相比,IUS、MRE和CTE的敏感性、特异性和总体准确性分别为60-99%、60-100%和70-99%。结论:所有的横断面成像技术在评估IBD的疾病活动性和严重程度方面显示出中等到良好的准确性。这一发现突出了在临床实践和临床试验中广泛应用MRE和IUS治疗IBD的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tunnel vision: rethinking local therapy for perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease. IOlBD evidence-based consensus on the use of artificial intelligence for assessment of endoscopic and histologic endpoints in clinical trials of inflammatory bowel disease. Patient knowledge and awareness on inflammatory bowel disease as it evolves as a global disease: a scoping review. Prior anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure and colectomy risk in acute severe ulcerative colitis: time-to-event and target-trial considerations in MOREUS (GETECCU). Anxiety and depression in newly diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (the IBSEN III study) compared with the general population in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1