Clinical utility and implementation of polygenic risk scores for predicting cardiovascular disease

IF 35.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae649
Heribert Schunkert, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Michael Inouye, Riyaz S Patel, Samuli Ripatti, Elisabeth Widen, Saskia C Sanderson, Juan Pablo Kaski, John W McEvoy, Panos Vardas, Angela Wood, Victor Aboyans, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Frank L J Visseren, Luis R Lopes, Perry Elliott, Maryam Kavousi
{"title":"Clinical utility and implementation of polygenic risk scores for predicting cardiovascular disease","authors":"Heribert Schunkert, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Michael Inouye, Riyaz S Patel, Samuli Ripatti, Elisabeth Widen, Saskia C Sanderson, Juan Pablo Kaski, John W McEvoy, Panos Vardas, Angela Wood, Victor Aboyans, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Frank L J Visseren, Luis R Lopes, Perry Elliott, Maryam Kavousi","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genome-wide association studies have revealed hundreds of genetic variants associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Polygenic risk scores (PRS) can capture this information in a single metric and hold promise for use in CVD risk prediction. Importantly, PRS information can reflect the causally mediated risk to which the individual is exposed throughout life. Although European Society of Cardiology guidelines do not currently advocate their use in routine clinical practice, PRS are commercially available and increasingly sought by clinicians, health systems, and members of the public to inform personalized health care decision-making. This clinical consensus statement provides an overview of the scientific basis of PRS and evidence to date on their role in CVD risk prediction for the purposes of disease prevention. It provides the reader with a summary of the opportunities and challenges for implementation and identifies current gaps in supporting evidence. The document also lays out a potential roadmap by which the scientific and clinical community can navigate any future transition of PRS into routine clinical care. Finally, clinical scenarios are presented where information from PRS may hold most value and discuss organizational frameworks to enable responsible use of PRS testing while more evidence is being generated by clinical studies.","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":35.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae649","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have revealed hundreds of genetic variants associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Polygenic risk scores (PRS) can capture this information in a single metric and hold promise for use in CVD risk prediction. Importantly, PRS information can reflect the causally mediated risk to which the individual is exposed throughout life. Although European Society of Cardiology guidelines do not currently advocate their use in routine clinical practice, PRS are commercially available and increasingly sought by clinicians, health systems, and members of the public to inform personalized health care decision-making. This clinical consensus statement provides an overview of the scientific basis of PRS and evidence to date on their role in CVD risk prediction for the purposes of disease prevention. It provides the reader with a summary of the opportunities and challenges for implementation and identifies current gaps in supporting evidence. The document also lays out a potential roadmap by which the scientific and clinical community can navigate any future transition of PRS into routine clinical care. Finally, clinical scenarios are presented where information from PRS may hold most value and discuss organizational frameworks to enable responsible use of PRS testing while more evidence is being generated by clinical studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多基因风险评分预测心血管疾病的临床应用与实施
全基因组关联研究揭示了数百种与心血管疾病(CVD)相关的遗传变异。多基因风险评分(PRS)可以在单一指标中捕获这些信息,并有望用于心血管疾病风险预测。重要的是,PRS信息可以反映个体在一生中暴露的因果介导的风险。尽管欧洲心脏病学会指南目前不提倡在常规临床实践中使用PRS,但PRS已经可以在商业上获得,并且越来越多地被临床医生、卫生系统和公众寻求,以告知个性化的卫生保健决策。这一临床共识声明概述了PRS的科学基础,并提供了迄今为止PRS在CVD风险预测中用于疾病预防的证据。它为读者提供了实施的机遇和挑战的摘要,并确定了目前在支持证据方面的差距。该文件还列出了一个潜在的路线图,通过该路线图,科学和临床社区可以引导PRS向常规临床护理的任何未来过渡。最后,介绍了临床场景,其中来自PRS的信息可能最有价值,并讨论了组织框架,以便在临床研究产生更多证据的同时,负责任地使用PRS测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
DMPK 3' untranslated repeat expansions in unexplained sudden cardiac death in the young. Beyond baseline health Status: additional factors in M-TEER response. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists reduce experimental atherosclerosis progression, inflammatory biomarkers and cardiovascular events, irrespective of hyperglycaemia and obesity. Weekly Journal Scan: Navigating the troubled OCEAN of post-ablation antithrombotic management. Anomalous origin of right vertebral artery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1