Cardiovascular Hospitalizations Among Older Adults in the US and Denmark

IF 14.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JAMA cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.5303
Frederikke Held Berg, Mats C. Højbjerg Lassen, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Gregg C. Fonarow, Robert W. Yeh, ZhaoNian Zheng, Gunnar H. Gislason, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Rishi K. Wadhera
{"title":"Cardiovascular Hospitalizations Among Older Adults in the US and Denmark","authors":"Frederikke Held Berg, Mats C. Højbjerg Lassen, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Gregg C. Fonarow, Robert W. Yeh, ZhaoNian Zheng, Gunnar H. Gislason, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Rishi K. Wadhera","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.5303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the US. However, it remains unclear how the burden of cardiovascular events in the US compares with that of other high-income countries with distinct health care systems like Denmark, both overall and by income.ObjectiveTo compare cardiovascular hospitalization rates (acute myocardial infarction [MI], heart failure [HF], ischemic stroke) and associated outcomes among adults 65 years or older, overall and by income, between the US and Denmark.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based cross-sectional study used national data from the US and Denmark from January 1, 2021, to January 1, 2022. The study population included all Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older in the US and all adults 65 years or older in Denmark.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was age- and sex-standardized hospitalization rates for MI, HF, and ischemic stroke, as well as 30-day all-cause mortality rates.ResultsThe US study population included 58 614 110 adults 65 years or older (mean [SE] age, 74.6 [7.7] years; 32 179 146 female [54.9%]) of whom 1 171 058 (2.0%) were hospitalized for a cardiovascular event. The Danish study population included 1 176 542 adults 65 years or older (mean [SE] age, 75.3 [7.1] years; 634 217 female [53.9%]) of whom 16 305 (1.4%) were hospitalized with a cardiovascular event. The overall age- and sex-standardized cardiovascular hospitalization rate was significantly higher in the US compared with Denmark (risk ratio [RR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.47-1.52), as were associated 30-day all-cause mortality rates (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17). Across conditions, the risk of hospitalization for MI (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.51-1.61) and HF (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.31-2.43) was significantly higher in the US compared with Denmark, whereas hospitalizations for ischemic stroke were lower (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93). Overall cardiovascular hospitalization rates in the US were more than 2-fold higher among low-income adults compared with higher-income adults (RR, 2.38; 95% CI, 2.25-2.47), whereas the magnitude of income-based disparities was smaller in Denmark (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.39-1.50).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this international cross-sectional study, cardiovascular hospitalization rates were significantly higher in the US compared with Denmark. There were income-based differences in the burden of cardiovascular hospitalizations in both countries, although the magnitude of these disparities was much greater in the US.","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.5303","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the US. However, it remains unclear how the burden of cardiovascular events in the US compares with that of other high-income countries with distinct health care systems like Denmark, both overall and by income.ObjectiveTo compare cardiovascular hospitalization rates (acute myocardial infarction [MI], heart failure [HF], ischemic stroke) and associated outcomes among adults 65 years or older, overall and by income, between the US and Denmark.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based cross-sectional study used national data from the US and Denmark from January 1, 2021, to January 1, 2022. The study population included all Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older in the US and all adults 65 years or older in Denmark.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was age- and sex-standardized hospitalization rates for MI, HF, and ischemic stroke, as well as 30-day all-cause mortality rates.ResultsThe US study population included 58 614 110 adults 65 years or older (mean [SE] age, 74.6 [7.7] years; 32 179 146 female [54.9%]) of whom 1 171 058 (2.0%) were hospitalized for a cardiovascular event. The Danish study population included 1 176 542 adults 65 years or older (mean [SE] age, 75.3 [7.1] years; 634 217 female [53.9%]) of whom 16 305 (1.4%) were hospitalized with a cardiovascular event. The overall age- and sex-standardized cardiovascular hospitalization rate was significantly higher in the US compared with Denmark (risk ratio [RR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.47-1.52), as were associated 30-day all-cause mortality rates (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17). Across conditions, the risk of hospitalization for MI (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.51-1.61) and HF (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.31-2.43) was significantly higher in the US compared with Denmark, whereas hospitalizations for ischemic stroke were lower (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93). Overall cardiovascular hospitalization rates in the US were more than 2-fold higher among low-income adults compared with higher-income adults (RR, 2.38; 95% CI, 2.25-2.47), whereas the magnitude of income-based disparities was smaller in Denmark (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.39-1.50).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this international cross-sectional study, cardiovascular hospitalization rates were significantly higher in the US compared with Denmark. There were income-based differences in the burden of cardiovascular hospitalizations in both countries, although the magnitude of these disparities was much greater in the US.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国和丹麦老年人心血管住院情况
心血管疾病是美国人死亡的主要原因。然而,目前尚不清楚美国的心血管事件负担与其他高收入国家(如丹麦)相比如何,这些国家拥有独特的医疗体系,无论是总体上还是收入上。目的比较美国和丹麦65岁及以上成年人的心血管住院率(急性心肌梗死[MI]、心力衰竭[HF]、缺血性卒中)和相关转归。设计、环境和参与者这项基于人群的横断面研究使用了美国和丹麦2021年1月1日至2022年1月1日的国家数据。研究人群包括美国所有65岁及以上的医疗保险受益人和丹麦所有65岁及以上的成年人。主要结局和测量主要结局是心梗、心衰和缺血性卒中的年龄和性别标准化住院率,以及30天全因死亡率。结果美国研究人群包括58 614 110名65岁及以上的成年人(平均[SE]年龄,74.6[7.7]岁;女性32 179 146例(54.9%),其中1 171 058例(2.0%)因心血管事件住院。丹麦的研究人群包括1 176 542名65岁或以上的成年人(平均[SE]年龄,75.3[7.1]岁;女性634217例(53.9%),其中16305例(1.4%)因心血管事件住院。美国总体年龄和性别标准化心血管住院率明显高于丹麦(风险比[RR], 1.50;95% CI, 1.47-1.52),以及相关的30天全因死亡率(RR, 1.12;95% ci, 1.06-1.17)。在各种情况下,心肌梗死住院的风险(RR, 1.56;95% CI, 1.51-1.61)和HF (RR, 2.37;95% CI, 2.31-2.43)在美国明显高于丹麦,而缺血性卒中住院率较低(RR, 0.90;95% ci, 0.88-0.93)。在美国,低收入成年人的总体心血管住院率是高收入成年人的2倍多(RR, 2.38;95% CI, 2.25-2.47),而丹麦的收入差距较小(RR, 1.45;95% ci, 1.39-1.50)。结论和相关性在这项国际横断面研究中,美国的心血管住院率明显高于丹麦。两国的心血管住院负担存在收入差异,但美国的差异更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA cardiology
JAMA cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
45.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
264
期刊介绍: JAMA Cardiology, an international peer-reviewed journal, serves as the premier publication for clinical investigators, clinicians, and trainees in cardiovascular medicine worldwide. As a member of the JAMA Network, it aligns with a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications. Published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues annually, JAMA Cardiology attracts over 4.3 million annual article views and downloads. Research articles become freely accessible online 12 months post-publication without any author fees. Moreover, the online version is readily accessible to institutions in developing countries through the World Health Organization's HINARI program. Positioned at the intersection of clinical investigation, actionable clinical science, and clinical practice, JAMA Cardiology prioritizes traditional and evolving cardiovascular medicine, alongside evidence-based health policy. It places particular emphasis on health equity, especially when grounded in original science, as a top editorial priority.
期刊最新文献
Myocardial Fibroblast Activation in Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. Myocardial Fibrosis and Early Intervention in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the EVOLVED Randomized Clinical Trial. Cardiac Fibrosis-An Emerging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target. RBM20 Truncating Variants and Human Cardiomyopathy. Burst Exercise Stress Testing in Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1