Haitham A. Ibrahim , Amal Elawady , David O. Prevatt
{"title":"Aerodynamic and codification study of low-rise buildings: Part I – Fully elevated structures","authors":"Haitham A. Ibrahim , Amal Elawady , David O. Prevatt","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Elevated residential buildings are widely used in cyclone- and hurricane-prone coastal regions, such as Australia and the United States, as an effective solution to mitigate both storm surge damage and the impacts of extreme winds. The recent edition of ASCE 7–22 introduced wind design provisions for elevated structures for the first time, but these provisions remain under ongoing refinement. This study aims to assess the adequacy of the current ASCE 7–22 wind pressure coefficient provisions for elevated structures by conducting large-scale boundary layer wind tunnel tests at FIU's Wall of Wind Facility. The tests explored the aerodynamics of elevated buildings with varying heights and aspect ratios. Eight 1:10 scale gable-roof buildings were constructed based on post-hurricane damage reports, and peak pressure coefficients (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow><mi>p</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) were estimated for the floor, roof, and walls. These values were compared against the existing ASCE 7–22 provisions, revealing a significant underestimation of the external pressure coefficients. Based on the results, this study proposes increasing the <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>C</mi></mrow><mi>p</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> boundaries of specific zones by 50%–127% and introduces two new floor zones for more accurate estimation of wind pressure coefficients on elevated buildings. These findings have broad implications for improving the wind performance of elevated structures, particularly in cyclone- and hurricane-prone regions globally. It is envisioned that the results of this study, along with those in the companion paper, will be considered by the ASCE 7 Subcommittee on Wind Loads for potential inclusion in the next edition of ASCE 7–28, contributing to more resilient building designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 105924"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002873","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Elevated residential buildings are widely used in cyclone- and hurricane-prone coastal regions, such as Australia and the United States, as an effective solution to mitigate both storm surge damage and the impacts of extreme winds. The recent edition of ASCE 7–22 introduced wind design provisions for elevated structures for the first time, but these provisions remain under ongoing refinement. This study aims to assess the adequacy of the current ASCE 7–22 wind pressure coefficient provisions for elevated structures by conducting large-scale boundary layer wind tunnel tests at FIU's Wall of Wind Facility. The tests explored the aerodynamics of elevated buildings with varying heights and aspect ratios. Eight 1:10 scale gable-roof buildings were constructed based on post-hurricane damage reports, and peak pressure coefficients () were estimated for the floor, roof, and walls. These values were compared against the existing ASCE 7–22 provisions, revealing a significant underestimation of the external pressure coefficients. Based on the results, this study proposes increasing the boundaries of specific zones by 50%–127% and introduces two new floor zones for more accurate estimation of wind pressure coefficients on elevated buildings. These findings have broad implications for improving the wind performance of elevated structures, particularly in cyclone- and hurricane-prone regions globally. It is envisioned that the results of this study, along with those in the companion paper, will be considered by the ASCE 7 Subcommittee on Wind Loads for potential inclusion in the next edition of ASCE 7–28, contributing to more resilient building designs.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects.
Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.