Ayub Akbari , Sriram Sriperumbuduri , Shreepryia Mangalgi , Vijay Joshi , Manish Sood , Amos Buh , Mohan Biyani , Christopher McCudden , Gregory L. Hundemer , Pierre Antoine Brown
{"title":"Spot Versus 24-Hour Urine Osmolality Measurement in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Diagnostic Test Study","authors":"Ayub Akbari , Sriram Sriperumbuduri , Shreepryia Mangalgi , Vijay Joshi , Manish Sood , Amos Buh , Mohan Biyani , Christopher McCudden , Gregory L. Hundemer , Pierre Antoine Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.100965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale & Objective</h3><div>Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is an established driver of cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Urine osmolality (osm) measures are surrogate markers of AVP activity. Both 24-hour and spot urine samples are used as indicators of AVP suppression. The agreement between these 2 measurements remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting & Study Population</h3><div>Three hundred and forty-nine patients with ADPKD with 839 urine samples from a tertiary care center.</div></div><div><h3>Selection Criteria for Study</h3><div>Patients with ADPKD with records of spot and 24-hour urine measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Consecutive patients’ data from January 2018 to March 2023 were extracted from the quality assurance database of The Ottawa Hospital Cystic Kidney Disease Clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Discordance assessed at target urine osmolality of 250 and 270<!--> <!-->mmol/kg. Agreement assessed by Bland-Altman plots. The percentage of patients with difference in osmolality between the 2 measures for cutoff points of<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->50,<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->100,<!--> <!-->>150, and<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->200<!--> <!-->mmol/kg was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean 24-hour urine osm was 364<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, and the mean spot urine osm was 424 mosm/kg. Mean age of 46 years, 52% females, and 47 (13.5%) were on tolvaptan. Overall, in comparing spot urine osm to 24-hour urine osm, the discordance at 250 and 270<!--> <!-->mmol/kg was 24% with poor agreement on Bland-Altman plots. The differences between the 2 measures at varying cutoff points were 53.9% at 50<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, 35.8% at 100<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, 24.1% at 150<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, and 16.1% at 200<!--> <!-->mmol/kg. Results were similar when only a single measurement from each patient was used for analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Total of 29% of patients did not have concurrent spot urine osmolality and 24-hour urine osmolality. The study was conducted at a single center. Limited number of patients were on tolvaptan.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In adults with ADPKD, important differences exist between the 24-hour urine osmolality and spot urine osmolality that preclude interchangeable use. The method employed may impact clinical decision-making. More research is needed to determine, which urine osm should be used when assessing AVP suppression.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>Urine osmolality measures are used clinically to dose tolvaptan in patients with adult polycystic kidney disease. We compared urine osmolality from 24-hour and spot urine samples. We found out that important differences exist between 24-hour and spot urine samples’ osmolality. The method employed to determine urine osmolality may impact clinical decision-making in the management of patients with adult polycystic kidney disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100965"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale & Objective
Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is an established driver of cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Urine osmolality (osm) measures are surrogate markers of AVP activity. Both 24-hour and spot urine samples are used as indicators of AVP suppression. The agreement between these 2 measurements remains unclear.
Study Design
A retrospective cohort study.
Setting & Study Population
Three hundred and forty-nine patients with ADPKD with 839 urine samples from a tertiary care center.
Selection Criteria for Study
Patients with ADPKD with records of spot and 24-hour urine measurements.
Data Extraction
Consecutive patients’ data from January 2018 to March 2023 were extracted from the quality assurance database of The Ottawa Hospital Cystic Kidney Disease Clinic.
Analytical Approach
Discordance assessed at target urine osmolality of 250 and 270 mmol/kg. Agreement assessed by Bland-Altman plots. The percentage of patients with difference in osmolality between the 2 measures for cutoff points of > 50, > 100, >150, and > 200 mmol/kg was calculated.
Results
The mean 24-hour urine osm was 364 mmol/kg, and the mean spot urine osm was 424 mosm/kg. Mean age of 46 years, 52% females, and 47 (13.5%) were on tolvaptan. Overall, in comparing spot urine osm to 24-hour urine osm, the discordance at 250 and 270 mmol/kg was 24% with poor agreement on Bland-Altman plots. The differences between the 2 measures at varying cutoff points were 53.9% at 50 mmol/kg, 35.8% at 100 mmol/kg, 24.1% at 150 mmol/kg, and 16.1% at 200 mmol/kg. Results were similar when only a single measurement from each patient was used for analysis.
Limitations
Total of 29% of patients did not have concurrent spot urine osmolality and 24-hour urine osmolality. The study was conducted at a single center. Limited number of patients were on tolvaptan.
Conclusions
In adults with ADPKD, important differences exist between the 24-hour urine osmolality and spot urine osmolality that preclude interchangeable use. The method employed may impact clinical decision-making. More research is needed to determine, which urine osm should be used when assessing AVP suppression.
Plain Language Summary
Urine osmolality measures are used clinically to dose tolvaptan in patients with adult polycystic kidney disease. We compared urine osmolality from 24-hour and spot urine samples. We found out that important differences exist between 24-hour and spot urine samples’ osmolality. The method employed to determine urine osmolality may impact clinical decision-making in the management of patients with adult polycystic kidney disease.