Understanding the experiences of birthing care during COVID-19: A qualitative systematic review

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100295
Danielle Macdonald , Kristen Bigelow-Talbert , Amanda Ross-White , Erna Snelgrove-Clarke , Leah Sookhoo
{"title":"Understanding the experiences of birthing care during COVID-19: A qualitative systematic review","authors":"Danielle Macdonald ,&nbsp;Kristen Bigelow-Talbert ,&nbsp;Amanda Ross-White ,&nbsp;Erna Snelgrove-Clarke ,&nbsp;Leah Sookhoo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Covid-19 pandemic was a challenging time for people who sought health care and for health care providers. Throughout the pandemic women and birthing people, families, and health care providers adapted to ongoing changes, restrictions, and new information to ensure that babies were born safely. There was a strong policy focus on safety and the reduction of infection, however this focus did not account for how the changes to birthing care practice would influence the experiences of the people most continuously sharing space during birth – women and birthing people, midwives, and nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore and understand the birthing care experiences of women and birthing people, midwives, and nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used the JBI methodology and methods to conduct our qualitative review. We included studies with participants who were women or birthing people, nurses, and midwives who received or provided birthing care during the Covid-19 global pandemic. Studies published between January 2020 and February 2023 were included. Studies had to report qualitative data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 5694 studies were identified for this review. After duplications were removed, screening and critical appraisal, 26 studies were included. Following meta-aggregation, 3 synthesized findings and 9 categories were created. The synthesized findings are 1) Navigating a pandemic and the chaos of constant changes 2) Striving for business as usual during a pandemic and 3) Amplifying variations in birthing care experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The experiences and needs of people who provide and receive birthing care must be prioritized in all spaces. Midwives, nurses, women, and birthing people must be included in decision making for changes to practices and policies at all levels, especially during uncertain times. Birth experiences must be respected and supported to ensure that health and wellness outcomes are optimized for families at all stages of the intrapartum, postpartum and early parenting journeys.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>Registered with Prospero CRD42021292832. An a priori protocol published, Macdonald, D., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Ross-White, A., &amp; Bigelow-Talbert, K. (2022). The experiences of birthing care during Covid-19: A systematic review protocol. <em>JBI Evidence Synthesis. 20</em>(5): 1353–1360<em>.</em> <span><span>https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21–00300</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Covid-19 pandemic was a challenging time for people who sought health care and for health care providers. Throughout the pandemic women and birthing people, families, and health care providers adapted to ongoing changes, restrictions, and new information to ensure that babies were born safely. There was a strong policy focus on safety and the reduction of infection, however this focus did not account for how the changes to birthing care practice would influence the experiences of the people most continuously sharing space during birth – women and birthing people, midwives, and nurses.

Objective

To explore and understand the birthing care experiences of women and birthing people, midwives, and nurses.

Methods

We used the JBI methodology and methods to conduct our qualitative review. We included studies with participants who were women or birthing people, nurses, and midwives who received or provided birthing care during the Covid-19 global pandemic. Studies published between January 2020 and February 2023 were included. Studies had to report qualitative data.

Results

A total of 5694 studies were identified for this review. After duplications were removed, screening and critical appraisal, 26 studies were included. Following meta-aggregation, 3 synthesized findings and 9 categories were created. The synthesized findings are 1) Navigating a pandemic and the chaos of constant changes 2) Striving for business as usual during a pandemic and 3) Amplifying variations in birthing care experiences.

Conclusions

The experiences and needs of people who provide and receive birthing care must be prioritized in all spaces. Midwives, nurses, women, and birthing people must be included in decision making for changes to practices and policies at all levels, especially during uncertain times. Birth experiences must be respected and supported to ensure that health and wellness outcomes are optimized for families at all stages of the intrapartum, postpartum and early parenting journeys.

Registration

Registered with Prospero CRD42021292832. An a priori protocol published, Macdonald, D., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Ross-White, A., & Bigelow-Talbert, K. (2022). The experiences of birthing care during Covid-19: A systematic review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 20(5): 1353–1360. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21–00300
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解COVID-19期间的分娩护理经验:一项定性系统评价
对于寻求医疗保健的人和医疗保健提供者来说,2019冠状病毒病大流行是一个充满挑战的时期。在整个大流行期间,妇女和产妇、家庭和卫生保健提供者适应了不断发生的变化、限制和新信息,以确保婴儿安全出生。政策重点关注安全和减少感染,但这一重点没有考虑到分娩护理实践的变化将如何影响分娩期间最频繁共享空间的人的经历——妇女和接生人员、助产士和护士。目的探讨和了解产妇及接生员、助产士、护士的分娩护理经验。方法采用JBI方法学和方法进行定性评价。我们纳入了在Covid-19全球大流行期间接受或提供分娩护理的妇女或分娩人员、护士和助产士的研究。纳入了2020年1月至2023年2月期间发表的研究。研究必须报告定性数据。结果本综述共纳入5694项研究。在剔除重复、筛选和严格评价后,纳入了26项研究。通过meta聚合,形成3个综合发现和9个分类。综合研究结果包括:1)应对大流行和不断变化的混乱;2)在大流行期间努力维持正常业务;3)扩大分娩护理经验的差异。结论所有场所都应优先考虑提供和接受分娩护理人员的经验和需求。必须将助产士、护士、妇女和分娩人员纳入各级改变做法和政策的决策中,特别是在不确定时期。必须尊重和支持分娩经验,以确保在分娩、产后和早期育儿过程的各个阶段,家庭的健康和保健结果都得到优化。注册与普洛斯彼罗注册CRD42021292832。Macdonald, D., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Ross-White, a ., &;毕格罗-塔尔伯特,K.(2022)。Covid-19期间的分娩护理经验:一项系统评价方案[j] .证据综合,20(5):1353-1360。https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies - 21 - 00300
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of a nurse anesthetist student–led training program on perioperative pain management in total knee replacement: A prospective before and after study Associations between formal social support in early postpartum, parenting self-efficacy, and parent-infant bonding: A cross-sectional survey Development of a supportive-educative nursing model based on health promotion for independent wound care in diabetic foot ulcer patients: A cross-sectional study Expert to novice: Understanding the challenges of transition to the specialist community public health nurse - health visitor role and its implications for role retention. A constructivist grounded theory Auditory stimulation to reduce procedure pain in neonates: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1