Impact of litter quality on soil nematode communities with the intensifies of grassland degradation: Shifting from resource input to environmental stress
{"title":"Impact of litter quality on soil nematode communities with the intensifies of grassland degradation: Shifting from resource input to environmental stress","authors":"Pingting Guan , Mengya Chen , Jianan Li , Junqi Zuo , Shitong Wei , Donghui Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2025.151021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Litter quality determines the resource input from aboveground processes in regulating soil biota function in degraded grassland. However, the knowledge of litter quality along with the degradation on the contribution to the soil biota remains sparse, particularly across different trophic groups, given their varying demands for food resources. A 240-day decomposition experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of the litter quality (high-quality and low-quality litters) on soil nematode communities at different intensities of grassland degradation (light, moderate and heavy). The results showed that, even though degradation induced the abundance of microbivorous nematode, the high trophic group nematode reduction was the primary factor that caused the decrease of top-down control from omnivore-predator (OP). Moreover, the metabolic footprint of omnivore-predator was more sensitive than its abundance with OP footprint taking over 40 % of the total footprint while its abundance taking 15 % of total abundance at the light degradation. At the light degraded level, high-quality litter promoted abundance and metabolic footprint of OP nematodes by 69.37 % and 88.27 %, respectively, compared to low-quality litter. These changes in the nematode communities and functions were primarily determined by the N resource change resulting from litter quality. On the contrary, at the moderate and heavy degraded levels, the execrable soil conditions, characterized by high soil pH, simplified the nematode food web. Therefore, the environmental stress screening on soil nematode communities from degradation exceeded the bottom-up effect from litter input. These results suggested that the community structure determined by long-term harsh soil conditions required more attention on the fundamental approach to soil quality rather than litter quality alone. It is critical to adapt appropriate management practices for rehabilitation in the maintenance of belowground communities in grassland restoration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 151021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405625000022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Litter quality determines the resource input from aboveground processes in regulating soil biota function in degraded grassland. However, the knowledge of litter quality along with the degradation on the contribution to the soil biota remains sparse, particularly across different trophic groups, given their varying demands for food resources. A 240-day decomposition experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of the litter quality (high-quality and low-quality litters) on soil nematode communities at different intensities of grassland degradation (light, moderate and heavy). The results showed that, even though degradation induced the abundance of microbivorous nematode, the high trophic group nematode reduction was the primary factor that caused the decrease of top-down control from omnivore-predator (OP). Moreover, the metabolic footprint of omnivore-predator was more sensitive than its abundance with OP footprint taking over 40 % of the total footprint while its abundance taking 15 % of total abundance at the light degradation. At the light degraded level, high-quality litter promoted abundance and metabolic footprint of OP nematodes by 69.37 % and 88.27 %, respectively, compared to low-quality litter. These changes in the nematode communities and functions were primarily determined by the N resource change resulting from litter quality. On the contrary, at the moderate and heavy degraded levels, the execrable soil conditions, characterized by high soil pH, simplified the nematode food web. Therefore, the environmental stress screening on soil nematode communities from degradation exceeded the bottom-up effect from litter input. These results suggested that the community structure determined by long-term harsh soil conditions required more attention on the fundamental approach to soil quality rather than litter quality alone. It is critical to adapt appropriate management practices for rehabilitation in the maintenance of belowground communities in grassland restoration.
期刊介绍:
Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments.
Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions.
We publish:
original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects);
descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research;
innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and
short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.