Comparative assessment of chloride family hydrogen production cycles driven by a nuclear-geothermal energy system

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108967
Sulenur Asal , Adem Acir , Ibrahim Dincer
{"title":"Comparative assessment of chloride family hydrogen production cycles driven by a nuclear-geothermal energy system","authors":"Sulenur Asal ,&nbsp;Adem Acir ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Dincer","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this present study, a nuclear geothermal hybrid system is designed and integrated three different chloride family hydrogen production cycles: cobalt-chloride, 3-step magnesium-chloride, and 4-step magnesium-chloride cycles. This study aims to investigate the integrated systems with the energy and exergy approaches employing the first and second laws of thermodynamics and compare the hydrogen production potentials of the cycles. The produced heat and electricity by nuclear geothermal hybrid system are employed in the hydrogen production cycles, remained heat and electricity are sent to the community for domestic usage. The nuclear geothermal hybrid system produces 1205.40 MW of heat and 578.56 MW of electricity. The hydrogen production amounts of the Co-Cl, 3- and 4-step Mg-Cl cycles are calculated as 0.27 kg/s, 1.09 kg/s and 0.97 kg/s, respectively. Consequently, the highest overall energy and exergy efficiencies are calculated to be 65.05 % and 88.27 % for the Co-Cl cycle driven by heat only. The integrated nuclear-geothermal hybrid also produces power as a useful output.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 108967"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135424003855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this present study, a nuclear geothermal hybrid system is designed and integrated three different chloride family hydrogen production cycles: cobalt-chloride, 3-step magnesium-chloride, and 4-step magnesium-chloride cycles. This study aims to investigate the integrated systems with the energy and exergy approaches employing the first and second laws of thermodynamics and compare the hydrogen production potentials of the cycles. The produced heat and electricity by nuclear geothermal hybrid system are employed in the hydrogen production cycles, remained heat and electricity are sent to the community for domestic usage. The nuclear geothermal hybrid system produces 1205.40 MW of heat and 578.56 MW of electricity. The hydrogen production amounts of the Co-Cl, 3- and 4-step Mg-Cl cycles are calculated as 0.27 kg/s, 1.09 kg/s and 0.97 kg/s, respectively. Consequently, the highest overall energy and exergy efficiencies are calculated to be 65.05 % and 88.27 % for the Co-Cl cycle driven by heat only. The integrated nuclear-geothermal hybrid also produces power as a useful output.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核地热能系统驱动氯族制氢循环的比较评价
在本研究中,设计了一个核地热混合系统,并集成了三种不同的氯化物族制氢循环:氯化钴循环、三步氯化镁循环和四步氯化镁循环。本研究的目的是利用热力学第一和第二定律研究能量和火用方法的集成系统,并比较循环的产氢势。核地热混合系统产生的热、电用于制氢循环,剩余的热、电送往社区供家庭使用。核地热混合系统产生1205.40兆瓦的热量和578.56兆瓦的电力。计算得出Co-Cl、3步Mg-Cl和4步Mg-Cl循环的产氢量分别为0.27 kg/s、1.09 kg/s和0.97 kg/s。因此,计算出仅由热量驱动的Co-Cl循环的最高总能量和火用效率分别为65.05%和88.27%。综合的核地热混合动力也可以作为有用的输出产生电力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
期刊最新文献
DAMRL-TOP: A dynamic action-mask RL framework for NOx emission optimization in FCC regenerators with multiple operational modes Data-driven conditional flexibility index An experiment of using a large language model to control a water tank system Data-based multi-fidelity modeling for online sensors correction Uncertainty and sensitivity assessment of a thermally managed cylindrical metal hydride hydrogen tank
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1