Shedding light on uncertainties in machine learning: formal derivation and optimal model selection

IF 4.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Journal of The Franklin Institute-engineering and Applied Mathematics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2025.107548
Giulio Del Corso, Sara Colantonio, Claudia Caudai
{"title":"Shedding light on uncertainties in machine learning: formal derivation and optimal model selection","authors":"Giulio Del Corso,&nbsp;Sara Colantonio,&nbsp;Claudia Caudai","doi":"10.1016/j.jfranklin.2025.107548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The concept of uncertainty has always been important in the field of mathematical modeling. In particular, the growing application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning methods in many scientific fields has led to the implementation and use of new uncertainty quantification techniques aimed at distinguishing between reliable and unreliable predictions. However, the novelty of this discipline and the plethora of articles produced, ranging from theoretical results to purely applied experiments, has resulted in a very fragmented and cluttered literature. In this review, we have attempted to combine the well-established mathematical background of the Bayesian framework with the practical aspect of modern state-of-the-art emerging techniques in order to meet the urgent need for clarity on key concepts related to uncertainty quantification. First, we introduced the different sources of uncertainty, ranging from epistemic/reducible to aleatoric/irreducible, providing both a rigorous mathematical derivation and several examples to facilitate understanding. The review then details some of the most important techniques for uncertainty quantification. These methods are compared in terms of their advantages and drawbacks and classified in terms of their intrusiveness, in order to provide the practitioner with a useful vademecum for selecting the optimal model depending on the application context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Franklin Institute-engineering and Applied Mathematics","volume":"362 3","pages":"Article 107548"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Franklin Institute-engineering and Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016003225000420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of uncertainty has always been important in the field of mathematical modeling. In particular, the growing application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning methods in many scientific fields has led to the implementation and use of new uncertainty quantification techniques aimed at distinguishing between reliable and unreliable predictions. However, the novelty of this discipline and the plethora of articles produced, ranging from theoretical results to purely applied experiments, has resulted in a very fragmented and cluttered literature. In this review, we have attempted to combine the well-established mathematical background of the Bayesian framework with the practical aspect of modern state-of-the-art emerging techniques in order to meet the urgent need for clarity on key concepts related to uncertainty quantification. First, we introduced the different sources of uncertainty, ranging from epistemic/reducible to aleatoric/irreducible, providing both a rigorous mathematical derivation and several examples to facilitate understanding. The review then details some of the most important techniques for uncertainty quantification. These methods are compared in terms of their advantages and drawbacks and classified in terms of their intrusiveness, in order to provide the practitioner with a useful vademecum for selecting the optimal model depending on the application context.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示机器学习中的不确定性:形式推导和最优模型选择
在数学建模领域,不确定性的概念一直是一个重要的概念。特别是,机器学习和深度学习方法在许多科学领域的日益增长的应用,导致了新的不确定性量化技术的实施和使用,旨在区分可靠和不可靠的预测。然而,这门学科的新颖性和产生的大量文章,从理论结果到纯粹的应用实验,导致了一个非常碎片化和混乱的文献。在这篇综述中,我们试图将贝叶斯框架的完善的数学背景与现代最先进的新兴技术的实践方面结合起来,以满足对不确定性量化相关关键概念的明确的迫切需要。首先,我们介绍了不确定性的不同来源,范围从认知/可约到任意/不可约,提供了严格的数学推导和几个例子,以方便理解。然后详细介绍了不确定度量化的一些最重要的技术。对这些方法的优缺点进行了比较,并根据其侵入性进行了分类,以便为实践者根据应用环境选择最优模型提供有用的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
586
审稿时长
6.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of The Franklin Institute has an established reputation for publishing high-quality papers in the field of engineering and applied mathematics. Its current focus is on control systems, complex networks and dynamic systems, signal processing and communications and their applications. All submitted papers are peer-reviewed. The Journal will publish original research papers and research review papers of substance. Papers and special focus issues are judged upon possible lasting value, which has been and continues to be the strength of the Journal of The Franklin Institute.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Enhancing quadrotor trajectory prediction via hybrid-corrected TCN-MLP network Practical prescribed-time formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots with connectivity maintenance and collision avoidance Voltage control of a class of underactuated electromechanical systems via an energy shaping approach A novel parameter-free filled function method for global optimization and solving nonlinear equation systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1