How does farmers' endogenous dynamic shape up in China's rural residential land system reform: Insights from the social-ecological system framework

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Habitat International Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103293
Limin Rong , Meiqiu Chen , Ting Zhang , Chang Huang , Mengling Zou
{"title":"How does farmers' endogenous dynamic shape up in China's rural residential land system reform: Insights from the social-ecological system framework","authors":"Limin Rong ,&nbsp;Meiqiu Chen ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Chang Huang ,&nbsp;Mengling Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Farmers' endogenous dynamic help advance rural land system reform. As a key aspect of China's rural land system reform, rural residential land system reform (RRLSR) is an important part of rural revitalization. Considering the collective ownership of rural residential land and the need for farmer participation in RRLSR, we introduce collective action theory to construct a Social-Ecological System (SES) framework in the context of RRLSR. Data from 766 surveys conducted in Jiangxi Province indicate that rural collective action contributes to RRLSR and stimulates endogenous dynamic, reflecting a logical chain of “rural collective action–reform community–farmers’ endogenous dynamic”. There are four pathways that promote farmers' endogenous dynamic, achieving a shift in attitude from “want me to reform” to “I want to reform”: (1) collective cohesion achieved through self-government organizations, (2) interest aggregation in farmers' sense of reform accessibility, (3) action synergy in farmers' subjectivity, and (4) institutional safeguards for the integration of the “three rules” (the rule of law, ethics, and self-government). Our findings highlight the need to (1) adhere to a government-guided, collective-led governance structure with farmers comprising the main body. (2) Strike a balance between individual and collective interests. (3) Respect farmers' willingness to participate to stimulate their sense of RRLSR ownership. (4) Build a pluralistic institutional system that integrates formal and informal rules. Beyond its implications for China, this study can serve as a reference for rural land system reform in other developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 103293"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525000098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmers' endogenous dynamic help advance rural land system reform. As a key aspect of China's rural land system reform, rural residential land system reform (RRLSR) is an important part of rural revitalization. Considering the collective ownership of rural residential land and the need for farmer participation in RRLSR, we introduce collective action theory to construct a Social-Ecological System (SES) framework in the context of RRLSR. Data from 766 surveys conducted in Jiangxi Province indicate that rural collective action contributes to RRLSR and stimulates endogenous dynamic, reflecting a logical chain of “rural collective action–reform community–farmers’ endogenous dynamic”. There are four pathways that promote farmers' endogenous dynamic, achieving a shift in attitude from “want me to reform” to “I want to reform”: (1) collective cohesion achieved through self-government organizations, (2) interest aggregation in farmers' sense of reform accessibility, (3) action synergy in farmers' subjectivity, and (4) institutional safeguards for the integration of the “three rules” (the rule of law, ethics, and self-government). Our findings highlight the need to (1) adhere to a government-guided, collective-led governance structure with farmers comprising the main body. (2) Strike a balance between individual and collective interests. (3) Respect farmers' willingness to participate to stimulate their sense of RRLSR ownership. (4) Build a pluralistic institutional system that integrates formal and informal rules. Beyond its implications for China, this study can serve as a reference for rural land system reform in other developing countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking migrants' social integration: The mediating effect of hierarchical migration in the context of China How does the digital economy affect the urban–rural income gap? Evidence from Chinese cities Residential segregation of Chinese minority groups in Greater Sydney Road to prosperity: How urban-rural transportation integration drives rural household consumption growth Enhancing agricultural production and environmental benefits through full mechanization: Experimental evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1