Social networks matter for villagers’ withdrawal from rural homesteads: An empirical analysis of sichuan in western China

IF 7 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Habitat International Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103305
Peng Tang , Linyi Tan , Jinlong Gao , Min Li , Shasha Zhang
{"title":"Social networks matter for villagers’ withdrawal from rural homesteads: An empirical analysis of sichuan in western China","authors":"Peng Tang ,&nbsp;Linyi Tan ,&nbsp;Jinlong Gao ,&nbsp;Min Li ,&nbsp;Shasha Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Withdrawal from rural homesteads (WRH) holds substantial significance for improving the habitat of villagers and revitalizing the countryside in China. However, the existing research tradition, which often neglect the endogenous features of rural society, largely constrains the full understanding of WRH. The specific mechanisms and pathways through which various networks embedded within rural societies shape the final decisions of villagers remain inadequately explored and lack conceptualization. To bridge this gap, this paper attempts to provide a brief glimpse of the fashions that different networks affect villagers' behavior in response to WRH. Drawing on 299 survey samples collected from four pilot areas for the rural homestead reform in Sichuan Province, we investigate both the direct impact of social networks and the mediating effect of social supports on villagers' WRH decisions. The results of the binary logit model indicate that villagers with more extensive social networks are more likely to withdraw from their homesteads (p &lt; 0.01). Notably, family ties emerge as a dominant factor (OR = 42.156) in influencing villagers' WRH decisions. <span>Furthermore</span>, through a stepwise regression model, we uncover that social networks work exert their influence via the mediating role of social supports. By quantifying the link between villagers’ social networks and their WRH decisions, we conclude that taking into account the endogenous characteristics of the rural society can contribute to the all-round revitalization of the rural in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 103305"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525000219","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Withdrawal from rural homesteads (WRH) holds substantial significance for improving the habitat of villagers and revitalizing the countryside in China. However, the existing research tradition, which often neglect the endogenous features of rural society, largely constrains the full understanding of WRH. The specific mechanisms and pathways through which various networks embedded within rural societies shape the final decisions of villagers remain inadequately explored and lack conceptualization. To bridge this gap, this paper attempts to provide a brief glimpse of the fashions that different networks affect villagers' behavior in response to WRH. Drawing on 299 survey samples collected from four pilot areas for the rural homestead reform in Sichuan Province, we investigate both the direct impact of social networks and the mediating effect of social supports on villagers' WRH decisions. The results of the binary logit model indicate that villagers with more extensive social networks are more likely to withdraw from their homesteads (p < 0.01). Notably, family ties emerge as a dominant factor (OR = 42.156) in influencing villagers' WRH decisions. Furthermore, through a stepwise regression model, we uncover that social networks work exert their influence via the mediating role of social supports. By quantifying the link between villagers’ social networks and their WRH decisions, we conclude that taking into account the endogenous characteristics of the rural society can contribute to the all-round revitalization of the rural in China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会网络对村民宅基地退出的影响——基于四川的实证分析
农村宅基地的退出对于改善农村人居环境、振兴农村具有重要意义。然而,现有的研究传统往往忽视了农村社会的内生特征,在很大程度上制约了对农村健康的充分认识。农村社会内各种网络影响村民最终决策的具体机制和途径仍未得到充分探索,也缺乏概念化。为了弥补这一差距,本文试图简要介绍不同网络影响村民响应WRH行为的方式。本文以四川省4个农村宅基地改革试点299个调查样本为样本,考察了社会网络对村民宅基地改革决策的直接影响和社会支持的中介效应。二元logit模型的结果表明,社会网络越广泛的村民越有可能退出他们的家园(p <;0.01)。值得注意的是,家庭关系成为影响村民WRH决策的主导因素(OR = 42.156)。此外,通过逐步回归模型,我们发现社会网络工作通过社会支持的中介作用发挥其影响。通过量化村民社会网络与其WRH决策之间的联系,我们得出结论:考虑农村社会的内生特征有助于中国农村的全面振兴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
期刊最新文献
Navigating the interplay of cities and artificial intelligence: Innovation, integration and interpretation Bridging the digital divide for resilient cities: Lessons from Chinese prefectures Merging to equalize: How village and town bank M&A narrows the urban–rural income gap Memory-led sensory gentrification: Sensory governance in the micro-renewal of Minzhu Village, Chongqing Village CEOs as gentrification agents: Gentrification and spatial governance in China's emerging tourism villages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1