Evaluating human-nature relationships at a grid scale in China, 2000–2020

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Habitat International Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103282
Haimeng Liu , Jiayi Lu , Xuecao Li , Yuanchen Wang , Dong Xu , Junfeng Yin , Gang Xu
{"title":"Evaluating human-nature relationships at a grid scale in China, 2000–2020","authors":"Haimeng Liu ,&nbsp;Jiayi Lu ,&nbsp;Xuecao Li ,&nbsp;Yuanchen Wang ,&nbsp;Dong Xu ,&nbsp;Junfeng Yin ,&nbsp;Gang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the complex relationships between humans and nature is crucial for achieving global sustainability and enhancing human welfare. China, with its vast population, stark human-nature contradictions, and considerable regional disparities, currently lacks grid-scale research methodologies and practices. We utilized the Human Footprint (HF) and Ecosystem Quality Index (EQI) as proxies for human-nature interactions. Employing the Sen + MK trend test, we analyzed their spatiotemporal dynamics across China on a 1 km<sup>2</sup> grid from 2000 to 2020. Using an improved four-quadrant diagram, we quantified human-nature relationships. Our findings reveal a trend toward greater coordination between humans and nature across China from 2000 to 2020, with areas of coordination outnumbering conflict zones by a factor of 2.4. Conflict predominantly occurred in the North China Plain and urban agglomerations. In most cities, the human-nature relationship exhibited a distinct concentric pattern: over 75% of old urban areas showed no significant change, while 80% of new urban areas experienced conflict. In nature reserves, human-nature relationships generally tended toward coordination, suggesting that conservation efforts have been largely effective. While increased human activity has generally supported ecosystem restoration and improvement at the national scale, rising HF in conflict areas has still significantly reduced the EQI. The implementation of government-led ecological projects in China has positively impacted human-nature relationships. However, urban land expansion remains a key factor contributing to human-nature conflicts. The methodology provides a valuable framework for assessing human-nature coordination across different scales and regions, facilitating dynamic regulation of ecological protection and grid-based management of the human settlement environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 103282"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397524002820","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the complex relationships between humans and nature is crucial for achieving global sustainability and enhancing human welfare. China, with its vast population, stark human-nature contradictions, and considerable regional disparities, currently lacks grid-scale research methodologies and practices. We utilized the Human Footprint (HF) and Ecosystem Quality Index (EQI) as proxies for human-nature interactions. Employing the Sen + MK trend test, we analyzed their spatiotemporal dynamics across China on a 1 km2 grid from 2000 to 2020. Using an improved four-quadrant diagram, we quantified human-nature relationships. Our findings reveal a trend toward greater coordination between humans and nature across China from 2000 to 2020, with areas of coordination outnumbering conflict zones by a factor of 2.4. Conflict predominantly occurred in the North China Plain and urban agglomerations. In most cities, the human-nature relationship exhibited a distinct concentric pattern: over 75% of old urban areas showed no significant change, while 80% of new urban areas experienced conflict. In nature reserves, human-nature relationships generally tended toward coordination, suggesting that conservation efforts have been largely effective. While increased human activity has generally supported ecosystem restoration and improvement at the national scale, rising HF in conflict areas has still significantly reduced the EQI. The implementation of government-led ecological projects in China has positively impacted human-nature relationships. However, urban land expansion remains a key factor contributing to human-nature conflicts. The methodology provides a valuable framework for assessing human-nature coordination across different scales and regions, facilitating dynamic regulation of ecological protection and grid-based management of the human settlement environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking migrants' social integration: The mediating effect of hierarchical migration in the context of China How does the digital economy affect the urban–rural income gap? Evidence from Chinese cities Residential segregation of Chinese minority groups in Greater Sydney Road to prosperity: How urban-rural transportation integration drives rural household consumption growth Enhancing agricultural production and environmental benefits through full mechanization: Experimental evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1